Yes, but without Charles choosing sides the next is George.It’s the recognition and history of the title and in my tiny mind I love that it’d send TW insane with jealousy that K is the woman with the ring and the title.
It’s the little things Rachel.
Work that connection Markles while you can because once Brenda motors down the heavenly mall in the Monarch Mobile to meet Phil hopefully we’ll see a united Chas and Will happy to squish the Cali2.When they announced that William and Catherine, Anne and Edward etc were not going to be in London at various parts of the big weekend, my first thought was that they had all said, "well, if they are coming, we are not going to be here."
I still think they will come.
The core working Royals will only mix with them at public events they attend. They will avoid them as much as possible.
They will come because they need to keep the link to the Monarch going.
Social media is helping them more.There is.
We all stop clicking on articles and looking at publications covering them.
But we can't stop. So the circle spins.
The Prince of Wales title took 10 years for charles , 20 until investiture.
The title isn't hereditary .
Automatic assumption exist only for a spouse, so if there is a Prince of Wales there is a Princess .
It's at the will of the Monarch. Like Edinburgh is currently .
William may simply chose Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge for example.
And something, I'm sure, Diana would want.When Brenda shuffles off to meet up with Phil, I’m just waiting for W +K to become Prince and Princess of Wales. Diana’s been gone a long time now , it’s time to stop that association with her and it’s all Kate’s.
https://giphy.com/l378drwiLVybbyuWYThis photo alone says more then words ever could.
But Charles was a child. William is an adult, so there is no reason to wait. In fact, Charles may want to do it asap, so Kate is The Princess of Wales, rather than Diana.The Prince of Wales title took 10 years for charles , 20 until investiture.
The title isn't hereditary .
Automatic assumption exist only for a spouse, so if there is a Prince of Wales there is a Princess .
It's at the will of the Monarch. Like Edinburgh is currently .
William may simply chose Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge for example.
That’s why we should copy the link, archive the article and then share it. That way we can read it, but they don’t get the click.There is.
We all stop clicking on articles and looking at publications covering them.
But we can't stop. So the circle spins.
It's all turned into the Markles Fucking Circus, my newsfeed, which is shit anyway. Is full of them and buoying up the will they won't they and the other crap spouted which we all know so well.It's probably the impact of Diana , (the popularity of it) but for the title holder there isn't even much benefit.
The heir apparent will anyway have precedence unless the Royal function or Royal duty demands precedence based on the Royal Duke title.
And even there William outranks Harry .
How do you archive an article? (I am an idiot, but willing to learn)That’s why we should copy the link, archive the article and then share it. That way we can read it, but they don’t get the click.
I thought that too - it was probably pre-arranged on the family Whatsapp group!That man-hugging between William and Mike is so obviously staged, they’re having a laugh making a public show of the family who supposedly never hug each other. Good timing just before the Cali liars show up. I bet it’s now a running joke among the RF. I can just imagine big Mike saying “Come ere Wills give us an ug”
George V was 36, George II 30 for the others a majority was 14 years of waiting.But Charles was a child. William is an adult, so there is no reason to wait. In fact, Charles may want to do it asap, so Kate is The Princess of Wales, rather than Diana.
That’s why we should copy the link, archive the article and then share it. That way we can read it, but they don’t get the click.
Go to archive.ph, paste the url of the article and hit the save button. It will then produce an archive.ph url which will link to the article. You can then paste the link here.How do you archive an article? (I am an idiot, but willing to learn)
They do read here.It's all turned into the Markles Fucking Circus, my newsfeed, which is shit anyway. Is full of them and buoying up the will they won't they and the other crap spouted which we all know so well.
Really pissing me off and despite anything else and for the UK public why the fuck did Liz ask them?? sick of the hearing about blackmail etc whatever it is they have got let's have it out in the open and deal with it.
Too bleeding much about them but, they have got what they wanted PR courtesy of our fucking, lazy,stupid press and hope the press read this forum.
A bunch of CUNTS
Locals and tourists report that nobody has lived there for a long time, and we keep hearing this. I read that Eug and Brokeback live in KP. No way are the Snarkles going to stay at Frog where they can be filmed with the Flatpacks with the press camped outside. They need to hide.Welcome new member. This has been discussed on previous threads. When The Gruesomes left for pastures new they wanted to keep Froggy as their 'UK base' but were told they would have to pay rent for it at the going rate if they wanted to keep it. Apparently they agreed to this so took out a lease and have been paying rent ever since. The lease expired in March but reports say they had renewed it.
Just my theory, but I think they have sub let the place to Eug to recoup the money they have been paying out for rent. So they still hold the lease even though they don't live there.
BIBOh look a green dress that doesn't look horrid and a brown hat that doesn't look like poop.....
View attachment 1304648
I'm reading stuff that the Cambridges are seen as bland and boring but Harkles are not.
Why?
Why do people think Cath and Will are boring and the other two not?
I don't get it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?