He's lead a pampered life, his family getting him out of trouble and mollycoddling him, no wonder he had a massive chip on his shoulder. He needs to remember how privileged he is.
He's lead a pampered life, his family getting him out of trouble and mollycoddling him, no wonder he had a massive chip on his shoulder. He needs to remember how privileged he is.Always has been a troublesome stupid selfish git his teachers said he wasn’t to bright and he had cheated and got extra help for his exams. Family probably paid for his qualifications.
Off to the army age 21 family probably thought it would do him good and help him grow up and learn some discipline but he still used his privilege and his narcissistic traits always remained. He got his own way all the time. Even though his family didn’t want him going to Iraq fearing for his safety, he did not care about others worries he wanted to go so he went threatening to leave the army if he wasn’t allowed. He used his privileges to get up the ladder while still being a little spoit child comparing operating weapons like videos games. the only reason he ever achieved anything in life because of who he was.
During his time in army he travelled the world, partied hard, twice publicly identified as a racist, God knows how many incidents we don’t know of.
Then leaves the army a year later meets a like minded narcissist and together they form a plan to use his privilege like he’s done all his life for their own personal interests.
They want to destroy the dated monarchy and rise above it all as the future celebrity royal couple. Better than other celebrity. Creating their own narrative. Controlling the media and carving out there new life with own rules.
The RF was to limiting for these kind of people they have so much more to offer the world.
Aren’t we so blessed to have such enlightened beings in the world today
If she tries to do that to someone who is not Royal they can sue her can’t they? Like when Elon Musk defamed the diver in Thailand. Someone would do no win no fee against them.Who knows, Peg may try to smear a British nanny, which would prompt discussions about the Cambs kids. The game of "trapped" extended to smear the next generation.
She will be with Harry tomorrow according to some articles.
I would hope anyone who donated funds would see this and resolve to not support another of their foundations or charities, but people don’t pay attention to that boring stuff.Almost half its funds gone on the winding up. What a fucking waste of charity money.
Sorry I am sweary today.
Thank you Chita and Bubbles xIdk If it's been mentioned this popped up on my news feed this morning:
Queen 'agreed to Harry's Oprah chats as he told her they were about veterans'
The Queen and Prince Charles are said to be "gobsmacked" following the airing of The Me You Can't See, which sees Prince Harry discussing mental health and continuing to criticise the royalswww.mirror.co.uk
I completely agree and it's a real sad state of affairs. I've seen this on a much smaller scale in real life as well. Because mental health has become so trendy (I hate this but it's true), a lot of people who seemed to be fine, albeit maybe not the most satisfied with their station in life (it was very clear from early on that Harry hated being the spare), are now throwing the word around like it's meaningless and crying about how hard they have it, and how they cannot work or be a functional person because of their "mental health issues." It's a real disservice to people who have actually gone through truly traumatic experiences and are dealing with real problems.Thank you Chita and Bubbles x
After his spell in the Army No.6 latched onto disabled veterans and veterans with PTSD charities, ending with a job as a Chimpo selling overpriced apps to genuine sufferers.
You can see the progression. First doing good work with armed forces charities, then abandoning them and by degrees over the months evolving mental health issues to suit himself and finally now using his "dead mother and cruel childhood" to attack the RF. Without the MH angle No. 6 would have no chance of a platform with Porker to spout his lies.
I think he got the idea from the soldiers he genuinely initially supported who had MH issues and trauma, and used this to develop "MH issues" for himself and move into the tricky waters of MH and suicide celebrity public reveals for the sole purpose of attacking his family. To this end he's now morphed into a full-blown pretend headcase jerking around on a TV show for the entertainment of millions.
Any mental health issues he had before and after his mother died were I think likely dealt with as best possible and he was more or less OK albeit immature and dim. But survivable under the protection of the RF. What we're seeing here is something completely different, anger manufactured and made worse by drugs, and deliberately stoked and nurtured in order to damage the Monarchy. So no attempt made by either party to seek help and get better.
No, you have to take context into account. He was saying it as part of a larger discussion about privacy and the media and specifically freedom of speech. It’s very clear he was referring to the first amendment.Does anyone think Harry made a mistake saying the 1st Amendment was 'bonkers'? I think he meant the 2nd amendment- the right to bear arms- thus relating to guns etc. I'm certainly no expert on the US constitution- and am happy to be corrected.
Diana is naturally beautiful and seems to have a kind heart, but she clearly had a lot of mental issues and I'm afraid it's been passed down to Harry. I don't think he's mentally ill in the sense that he's traumatized like he claims, but he clearly has issues with accepting reality and when things don't go his way. Diana was hurt by her husband not being in love with her but a lot of her retaliatory measures were clear signs of someone extremely unstable and manipulative to the nines. Mental illnesses are often genetic and if you do get that gene, you really have to work hard to fight against it and it's a lifelong process, and stay away from triggering people and environments. Clearly Megs has done nothing but encourage his madness for a quick buck.Once he gets cornered, Harry will say one day that all his MH issues stemed from his family, that there is nothing wrong with him and that the various therapies that he used served the purpose of helping others, and once he left everything is OK, and the therapists were basically obsolete.
The above was his mother's claim, she also added that the therapists needed more help than she did.
She got away with it.
BIB: That's very true, I'd never really thought about it like that before. Without marrying into the RF, Diana was just another uneducated aristocrat (but I'll give her a bit of credit since she did excel in things like music and dance whilst not being 'smart' in the traditional sense). Similarly with Harry, had he not been born into the RF, god knows what career he'd have been in with the grades he got at school as well as his terrible work ethic. As for Harry's wife, without marrying Harry, she was just another Hollywood wannabe trying to 'make it' without having any actual talent.Usually when a person is incapable of keeping mundane things of their life story straight, the chances increase that they are just a liar, nothing more.
Harry's whining about money, is the stereotype of the upper classes which are often used to others paying for their fun, yachts, parties even real estate.
Fact is that even Charles complains about coins.
There are mere mortals and there are the clients of Couts, Cie Rotschild, and Bank of Nominees, which are different leagues of wealth.
Diana for example inherited the Spencer Trust Fund in 94/95, the money is never mentioned about 20 milion£. She got free housing, free travel (Crown) , staff paid by the Crown and a estimated worth of jewelry of about 50 million. Plus divorce settlement.
When Peg arrived on the scene, pap walking in Wellington boots, I estimated Harry at about 60 million£, even if everything is locked away from the wife, nothing is locked away from the children.
They are after global fame, and global influence, the billionaire league, just with added stardom.
The events of the past are enabling them, their delusions of grandeur are telling them that they are doing nothing wrong, nothing that Diana hasn't done, by turning the monarchy into a voyeuristic fantasy made real, the pop princess, the people's princess, and the global star mingling with politician's without a single O level, purely by virtue of marriage (its what made it possible)
Her staunchest worshiper Morton in his book, doesn't miss the opportunity to point out how she modernised the monarchy, and changed their boring stuffiness of the 70s.
The point is that their game is based on the past, and this time they are going to play the long one, until the start of Charles reign, unless they completely selfdestruct by then, the start of Charles reign will make them dangerous.
New Idea was right once in their existence, not being informed about the blackout, and outing Harry in Afghanistan.Excuse me if this has been seen/posted but this AU rag is convinced she the cowbag has given birth secretly weeks ago. Nothing would surprise me .
Meghan’s Baby Girl Secret!
Neighbours are convinced the Sussexes’ daughter has arrived.www.newidea.com.au
You have to care to do things like this , you have to be a kind person with a heart . PWBHW IS NEITHER .The Scotland tour was a huge success. The photos and videos were beautiful.
I wonder if H and M could have accomplished something like that? And how they feel about seeing this?
Their commercial deals don't have the same reach and warmth.
Kate looked so pretty in the pink dress she wore for this little girl. Maybe Meghan just didn't have this princess quality, she is more of a starlet.
İf she has 'given birth' then the lay-low down-time is connected to appearing as the perfect mother (outer tweakments/hair/outfit). İf the surrogate has given birth then it's the same really - all efforts into appearing perfect. Teamed up with a zoom when the time is right tapping into Diana/statue/significance of a girl birth/strong girl empowerment blah blah blah. Or maybe G-String King will do the news like last time.Excuse me if this has been seen/posted but this AU rag is convinced she the cowbag has given birth secretly weeks ago. Nothing would surprise me .
Meghan’s Baby Girl Secret!
Neighbours are convinced the Sussexes’ daughter has arrived.www.newidea.com.au
There was genuine warmth and delight at being in Scotland because that's where they met as students. Catherine has such an easy way with all sorts of people and as a couple they come across as in tune and a true partnership.The Scotland tour was a huge success. The photos and videos were beautiful.
I wonder if H and M could have accomplished something like that? And how they feel about seeing this?
Their commercial deals don't have the same reach and warmth.
Kate looked so pretty in the pink dress she wore for this little girl. Maybe Meghan just didn't have this princess quality, she is more of a starlet.
Smeg will have gazed at him boss-eyed and sworn that she loved him for his mangy ginger loins, his piercing blue eyes and chiselled profile.... my Prince, my dashing Richmond. .. No need for a pre-nup, we will be together 4Eva darling. .. they're all against us.. nobody roasts a chicken for you like I do darling....hiss ...hiss..This is in the DE ....
TQ was pushing for a pre nup to protect PH's wealth.
"“He’s determined that his marriage will be a lasting one, so there’s no need for him to sign anything.”
Harry is said to have been worth approximately £30million around the time of their wedding, while Meghan was estimated to be worth £4million following her successful acting career on the legal drama Suits.
Although Kensington Palace declined to comment at the time — describing it as a “private matter” — it’s also not customary for royals to sign prenups, so it would have been out of the ordinary for the Queen to request one for the Sussexes.
He'll live to regret being so arrogant and pig headed - that's if there is anything left by now.
Isn't Abigail Spencer one of the 5 Friends who spoke to People magazine? One of them was petrified of being named and gave a statement which was "unreliable", and I wonder if it was her? Will the witnesses for the Complainant all be porn-stars and bottom-feeders? Smeg, Abigail, Scrotei.. A right cluster....!Did you all know there is a very...graphic video of Meg's good friend Abigail Spencer who has been praising the scammer periodically in the news, playing with herself and the camera is pointed directly at her nether regions? She's also moaning and saying some pretty graphic things in the clip. Apparently she was sending this to men after her divorce and she has a son as well. I'm not saying she's a bad person for being sexual but to do it so openly especially with strange men when you have a young child seems very distasteful. They say you are the company you keep...
Well, if I'm honest then I have to sat filming yourself rubbing one out while hollering expletives is a shitty hobby when you have a kid. Nothing is safe these days, just don't do it. Unless you are a gambler and thrill seeker happy to take a punt that it will stay secret. It won't. Secrets are only a secret if you tell no one at all ... but clearly someone was filming the fragrant abby. She's a mouthy cunt and a great match for smeggy anyway. Birds of a feather etc.Ignore it, its unfair it was a hack, called the Fappening.
Basically unsecured cloud.
Jennifer Lawrence and many other are there. It's not attention seeking/money making porn, it was a private leak.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?