Cringing soooo much… does she have no self awareness
I don't know what's happened to it, I used to like her nerdy/slightly academic vibeHer style is TERRIBLE!
I think it's that so much of her style feels so dated. She hasn't tried to keep up with new styles while maintaining the core of what she likes with clothing or trying new things. Everything just looks....bad.I don't know what's happened to it, I used to like her nerdy/slightly academic vibe
Omg don't I used to wear this stuff in 6th form and what you said describes her style perfectlyShe gives me old peacock and Dorothy Perkins aka whatever has ended up in the charity shop that 6th formers no longer want to wear
She could buy a few sustainable peices and a video alongside. I'd like to find some more sustainable brands outside Lucy and Yak or Organic BasicsOmg don't I used to wear this stuff in 6th form and what you said describes her style perfectly
I'll commend her for being sustainable and having these pieces for years or whatever but surely it's nice to treat yourself to some newer stuff
There definitely is logic there.. it's 'her' horniness vs her son's face?Hannah: I keep my sons face offline to protect him
also Hannah: I was so horny for my husband!
where is the logic?
how is putting intimate details of her life when she’s easily found protecting her son from possible bullying from his peers?There definitely is logic there.. it's 'her' horniness vs her son's face?
Also there is tech out there that removes emojis from photos (I learnt this on another thread, but there are creeps out there who will use it)how is putting intimate details of her life when she’s easily found protecting her son from possible bullying from his peers?
I don’t understand any of them who do this sort of thing tbh. The emoji face baby does my head in. If you don’t want to show them then don’t but if your only concern is their face being recognised and not everything else you put online effecting them then your priorities don’t align. My opinion, obviously.
while I agree with you, if her kids are going to be embarrassed by intimate details of her life being out there, I think that ship sailed a long time ago given her youtube channel!how is putting intimate details of her life when she’s easily found protecting her son from possible bullying from his peers?
I don’t understand any of them who do this sort of thing tbh. The emoji face baby does my head in. If you don’t want to show them then don’t but if your only concern is their face being recognised and not everything else you put online effecting them then your priorities don’t align. My opinion, obviously.
Not if the photo was uploaded with the emoji attached. Within apps, you can remove "stickers" as they are just saved as separate layers on the photo, using the same app that you placed it on.Also there is tech out there that removes emojis from photos (I learnt this on another thread, but there are creeps out there who will use it)
Ohh good to know, as I said I only learnt this on another thread and it's not something I'd google myselfNot if the photo was uploaded with the emoji attached. Within apps, you can remove "stickers" as they are just saved as separate layers on the photo, using the same app that you placed it on.
You can remove the emoji, but would have to fake what's underneath it (which is how some photos are edited to remove people, things etc - they use the current background to "guess" how it would've looked).
Her Patreon says to me she has 951 paid members.1) She has 3127 patreons, with a minimum of £3 per month, max £8.50. This comes to £9,381 - £26,579.50 per month or £112,572 - £318,954 per year.
*not taking into account Patreon fees or people choosing a custom amount which is apparently a thing if you dig deep enough into the settings