It was Nietzsche who said that about Christianity being the religion of slaves and women. He classed Christianity as part of the 'slave morality' he condemned as opposed to the strong with a will to power, like the ancient Greeks and Romans he had a constant hard-on for.
Nietzsche had some proper beef with St Paul, who he thought twisted Christianity until it was the opposite of what Christ intended. I have to say, I 70% agree with him - not fully, but 70%. Paul was a cultural elite and he instituionalised Christianity and added a bunch of stuff to make it acceptable. Christ's teachings were proper revolutionary. Paul's were the same old patriarchy.
Christ's teachings are highly pro-woman. Who were his closest disciples? Mary Magdalen, Mary & Martha. Who was given the privilege of being the first to learn of his resurrection? Mary Magdalen. Who gets the most authorial respect in the New Testament? His mum.
Also, the first and most generous financial backers of Christianity were rich Hellenistic women. Christ's Christianity is defo a religion of strong women. But Paul took it and put the patriarchy back in.
Nietzsche is the guy who said "God is dead" but he didn't mean it triumphantly. He thought it was a really
duck-up to kill God, because it meant that we would now have no forgiveness and empathy, and we would be stranded without a unifying moral code. And I think that is exactly what has happened. And we've been tossing around desperately trying to find a replacement belief ever since (Communism, facism, environmentalism, trans...none of it's worked as well as Christianity did! How much have we regressed since we killed God? We've been
bleeping idiots!)
I still get
bleeping chills when I read Nietzsche's prophetic lament:
"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?"