Ispyabudgetbeanblogger
Chatty Member
@Blaggings I can only speak for myself, but what I find most egregious about the trans rights movement (as represented by Stonewall, Pink News, etc.) is that is so inconsistent and illogical.
I don't have an issue with trans people, but as others have said, the definition of trans people is now effectively meaningless. Some examples of inconsistencies/lack of critical thinking.
Transwomen are women.
This statement is patently false. Transwomen are transwomen. They are biologically male, but have chosen to make changes to their bodies and they way they dress, speak, their names, etc. In a free society, anyone has the right to do that. I absolutely do not want to legislate what people can wear, what they want to call themselves, etc. However, sex-segregated spaces are based on the material reality of sex, so if you say transwomen are women, sex-segregated spaces become meaningless. I want all people to be safe from harm and have access to the services they need. I don't want this to happen at the expense of women. We can find other solutions and some things can be decided on a case to case basis.
Trans rights are equivalent to gay rights.
I think the two are completely different. Someone's sexual orientation is fundamentally part of who they are. It cannot be changed. It makes no difference how old you are, whether you are celibate, single or in a relationship. Your sexuality doesn't change. There's nothing a straight, gay or bi person has to do to be straight, gay or bi. We just are who we are. No one is just trans. You become trans, by transitioning. The clue is in the name. Transitioning is the treatment for people who have gender dysphoria. It is a fairly extreme treatment for what can be a very serious mental health condition. Those suffering from that condition deserve access to good treatment. They deserve not to be discriminated against because of their condition. Trans rights are much more in line with rights for people with medical conditions. We all deserve access to suitable treatment, to be treated fairly at work, to not be harrassed, etc.
It is brave to come out as trans. Everyone who says they are trans should be affirmed and have access to surgery and hormone treatment.
This is one that completely baffles me. Many parents who would be shocked at their daughter saying 'I don't feel good in my body, I want breast augmentation and lip injections' claim to be fine with their daughter saying 'I don't feel good in my body. I'm a boy. I need a double mascectomy and lifelong hormone treatment.' To me, either both positions are equally valid, or both need to be questioned. See also people like Oprah Winfrey applauding pictures of Elliot Page post surgery. Would she have done it if EP had got a massive boob job, butt implants and had posed in a tiny bikini? I don't think so. The hypocracy drives me nuts.
Deadnaming is literal violence.
First of all, it isn't. Violence is something else. Secondly, this whole deadnaming movement has gone completely nuts. I listened to a podcast about the Kardashians a while ago. It talked about how Kris met Caitlyn, how Kris and Caitlyn got married, had kids together, etc. That's just rewriting history. If you didn't know who Caitlyn Jenner was, you'd wonder when gay marriage became legal in California, who the birth mother was, when Kris realised she was bisexual, etc. It's just a small example, but you cannot rewrite history. Calling people who have changed their name for whatever reason by their old name to their face is an asshole move. Rewriting history by pretending that the history of the trans person as a man or woman before transition didn't exist is a lie, confusing and hurtful to their families and friends. I have a lesbian friend whose partner transitioned, effectively putting my friend back in the closet. It was hurtful to her. But she can't say so publicly, because that would make her a transphobe.
Citing Iran/Innuit people/Joan of Arc/Yentl as trans heroes
This one is a big one on social media. The lack of critical thinking is painful. Iran is particularly offensive, but rewriting history by claiming that women who dressed as men were trans also pisses me off. I can't be bothered to type out why, but I can only hope that some of the kids wrapped up in this cult travel the world and pick up a few history books at some point.
In conclusion, I'm worried about women's rights, I'm worried about putting young people on a needless path of endless medication and I'm most worried about how idiotic the entire movement is.
I don't have an issue with trans people, but as others have said, the definition of trans people is now effectively meaningless. Some examples of inconsistencies/lack of critical thinking.
Transwomen are women.
This statement is patently false. Transwomen are transwomen. They are biologically male, but have chosen to make changes to their bodies and they way they dress, speak, their names, etc. In a free society, anyone has the right to do that. I absolutely do not want to legislate what people can wear, what they want to call themselves, etc. However, sex-segregated spaces are based on the material reality of sex, so if you say transwomen are women, sex-segregated spaces become meaningless. I want all people to be safe from harm and have access to the services they need. I don't want this to happen at the expense of women. We can find other solutions and some things can be decided on a case to case basis.
Trans rights are equivalent to gay rights.
I think the two are completely different. Someone's sexual orientation is fundamentally part of who they are. It cannot be changed. It makes no difference how old you are, whether you are celibate, single or in a relationship. Your sexuality doesn't change. There's nothing a straight, gay or bi person has to do to be straight, gay or bi. We just are who we are. No one is just trans. You become trans, by transitioning. The clue is in the name. Transitioning is the treatment for people who have gender dysphoria. It is a fairly extreme treatment for what can be a very serious mental health condition. Those suffering from that condition deserve access to good treatment. They deserve not to be discriminated against because of their condition. Trans rights are much more in line with rights for people with medical conditions. We all deserve access to suitable treatment, to be treated fairly at work, to not be harrassed, etc.
It is brave to come out as trans. Everyone who says they are trans should be affirmed and have access to surgery and hormone treatment.
This is one that completely baffles me. Many parents who would be shocked at their daughter saying 'I don't feel good in my body, I want breast augmentation and lip injections' claim to be fine with their daughter saying 'I don't feel good in my body. I'm a boy. I need a double mascectomy and lifelong hormone treatment.' To me, either both positions are equally valid, or both need to be questioned. See also people like Oprah Winfrey applauding pictures of Elliot Page post surgery. Would she have done it if EP had got a massive boob job, butt implants and had posed in a tiny bikini? I don't think so. The hypocracy drives me nuts.
Deadnaming is literal violence.
First of all, it isn't. Violence is something else. Secondly, this whole deadnaming movement has gone completely nuts. I listened to a podcast about the Kardashians a while ago. It talked about how Kris met Caitlyn, how Kris and Caitlyn got married, had kids together, etc. That's just rewriting history. If you didn't know who Caitlyn Jenner was, you'd wonder when gay marriage became legal in California, who the birth mother was, when Kris realised she was bisexual, etc. It's just a small example, but you cannot rewrite history. Calling people who have changed their name for whatever reason by their old name to their face is an asshole move. Rewriting history by pretending that the history of the trans person as a man or woman before transition didn't exist is a lie, confusing and hurtful to their families and friends. I have a lesbian friend whose partner transitioned, effectively putting my friend back in the closet. It was hurtful to her. But she can't say so publicly, because that would make her a transphobe.
Citing Iran/Innuit people/Joan of Arc/Yentl as trans heroes
This one is a big one on social media. The lack of critical thinking is painful. Iran is particularly offensive, but rewriting history by claiming that women who dressed as men were trans also pisses me off. I can't be bothered to type out why, but I can only hope that some of the kids wrapped up in this cult travel the world and pick up a few history books at some point.
In conclusion, I'm worried about women's rights, I'm worried about putting young people on a needless path of endless medication and I'm most worried about how idiotic the entire movement is.