Gawd, what a naff, enabling photographFFS, a faceless woman, slightly out of focus, specifically positioned in the background, while two selfish narcissists grin smugly like imbeciles
just about sums it all up.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
just about sums it all up.
Thank you for the explanation.
How about no.
Attachments
Dressed horrifyingly like a HandmaidFFS, a faceless woman, slightly out of focus, specifically positioned in the background, while two selfish narcissists grin smugly like imbeciles
Countries in which Islam is the majority are invariably some of the worst countries to live in, especially for women, girls, and gay people.
Might be due to culture, might be due to religion, but the correlation is there.
Also, it's a bit rich to always blame the US (and Israel, I guess...) for any Islam-related problems. ISIS may have been supported by the US at the beginning, but even then thousands of Muslims voluntarily joined and participated in the atrocities.
It would be helpful if Muslims, like any other religion or ethnic groups, did some serious introspection and work in their own communities rather than always blame others.
Might be due to culture, might be due to religion, but the correlation is there.
Also, it's a bit rich to always blame the US (and Israel, I guess...) for any Islam-related problems. ISIS may have been supported by the US at the beginning, but even then thousands of Muslims voluntarily joined and participated in the atrocities.
It would be helpful if Muslims, like any other religion or ethnic groups, did some serious introspection and work in their own communities rather than always blame others.
Correlation doesnât mean causation.
and yes, when you know the history of your own country and knows exactly who pulled the strings, that isnât considered as blaming, but simply pointing out the stuffs that people are not willing to discuss about it because theyâd be labeled as âPonting fingersâ
and yes, when you know the history of your own country and knows exactly who pulled the strings, that isnât considered as blaming, but simply pointing out the stuffs that people are not willing to discuss about it because theyâd be labeled as âPonting fingersâ
not seeing much compassion here
Attachments
'Dangerous' man jailed for over 18 years for catalogue of violent sexual offences against vulnerable woman
In her summary before sentencing, HHJ Kaul QC said it was a âcampaign of the most appalling treatment many in this court may have seen.â She also stated that...
How long before he uses âgender identityâ to move to a womens prison?
Iâm not sure what âinsightfulâ revelation they think theyâre making: âI am biologically female, and this ruling affects biological females, ergo this ruling affects meâ.
Well, yeah. Any superficial labels anyone attaches to themselves beyond biological reality are irrelevant.
bleeping wierd.
Julie Bindel taking Nottingham City council to court after they banned her from a library where she was going to give a talk on the increasing threat of male domestic violence and rape. She was doing the talk for free in a library which is slated for closure in a deprived area. All the tickets had been sold.
Like it or not this is why the likes of the daily mail and the telegraph both labelled right wing are crucial in getting this out there.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Like it or not this is why the likes of the daily mail and the telegraph both labelled right wing are crucial in getting this out there.
JULIE BINDEL will sue council which banned her talk at a library
JULIE BINDEL: My talk in Nottinghamshire was cancelled on the ludicrous grounds that my views on transgender rights are 'at odds' with civic policy. Now I am suing the council responsible.
Historically speaking, you do know that during the 1900s under the invasion of the Dutch, British, Portuguese, and the Japanese their president had to make a pact with Aceh to borrow their resources to fend off them who tried to force Christianity by killing their people? And in return this pact allows Aceh to be part of the country but in return they are allowed to erect their own laws apart from Democracy? You do realise they were once had their own kingdoms then turned into separate states before uniting as a republic? You cant segregate a discussion without looking at their historical background
You probably missed reading my reply but as stated above, it was the judgeâs decision and her family to impose corporal punishment.
Do you think they jus stand there and do nothing about it? They complained and they rallied about the issue in Aceh but itâs not as simple as pushing Boris to the parliament to confess. It has to do with history, and frankly speaking, to be able to held a protest let alone a massive one is a privilege in itself.
You canât participate in a rally to fight against a cause without having proper access to medicine, you have to be healthy to participate, you must have a job you can leave for a day to participate in a rally and still getting paid, to have the resource, etc. to keep demanding them to fight the invincible fight just because you donât see them on a daily basis doesnât mean they didnât try their best.
If weâre against corporal law then we should abolish any types of death punishment. and to advocate for fairness in jail so all prisoners, no matter their crime shouldnât get beaten to death by the other prisoners or the prison guard.
After all, beating someone isnât very compassionate no matter the crime, gender, religion, height, weight, colour
@annagerda83 Honey, it's SEX not GENDER. If you're not on board with that then I wonder why you're in this thread.
During the 1930's in the UK, millions of working class people rallied against government. They didn't have access to medicine because they couldn't afford it. They didn't have a job they could leave for the day. Jobs were rare and if you went off to a rally you'd probably be sacked and they certainly wouldn't have been paid. They found their own resources because they educated themselves. And you know what? They won. So don't tell me about poor blighted people who shouldn't be expected to fight for themselves. I come from poor blighted people and they got up and fought. We've seen the same actions all over the world.
During the 1930's in the UK, millions of working class people rallied against government. They didn't have access to medicine because they couldn't afford it. They didn't have a job they could leave for the day. Jobs were rare and if you went off to a rally you'd probably be sacked and they certainly wouldn't have been paid. They found their own resources because they educated themselves. And you know what? They won. So don't tell me about poor blighted people who shouldn't be expected to fight for themselves. I come from poor blighted people and they got up and fought. We've seen the same actions all over the world.
Its 2022 so what happened in the 1900's has no bearing on concert sized crowds that follow islam cheering and filming with their mobile phones whilst people are publicly beaten for having same sex relationships or showing affection outside marriage. The vidoe's of this happening are brutal which is why I never linked them. I will give you the benefit of the doubt assuming that your internet may be monitored in your country so criticising islam could lead to action against you. Whilst this debate is interesting I don't want to derail the thread by turning this into a thread that criticises Islam and gender ideology. Lets leave it just to the latter
The reason âthose feministsâ who have been accused of Islamophobia were talking about Muslim men in the first place was because of things that have happened here, in the UK. Things that have happened because both the police and the local communities the men came from turned a blind eye to the rape and sexual trafficking of girls from poor and underprivileged backgrounds, some as young as 12, some with mental health issues, many of them in the care system. The police and social services initially blamed the girls because of âcultural sensitivitiesâ and because victim blaming of women and girls is widely accepted in some police forces.
All this other stuff about what is or isnât happening in other countries is derailment, and just another way of shutting up women by implying they are âphobicâ or bigots.
All this other stuff about what is or isnât happening in other countries is derailment, and just another way of shutting up women by implying they are âphobicâ or bigots.
We need an eye roll reaction.
You would really think that a 'trans man' who has just lost the right to abortion would be forced to grapple with how downright stupid gender ideology is, wouldn't you? How, on a personal level, can you lose a right like that and still think there's any weight to 'gender' whatsoever? This person can't identify out of misogyny, they might think they're a man but they've still just lost a right as a woman. I would honestly think this whole charade would be collapsing right now for 'trans men' in America. It truly boggles the mind.
Honestly wouldn't be surprised if some of them didnât believe this will apply to them, such are their beliefs(delusions) that they are pregnant men not pregnant women.
This is part of the reason that I no longer support Trans Ideology in any way, shape or form. Placing the importance on gender instead of sex is literally sending some people insane. Gender has no importance whatsoever. You might as well call it fashion or use fashion in a similar way. Can you imagine people who identify as (insert fashion house here) Can't think of any, sorry.
Gender doesn't change your chromosomes. Gender doesn't change your sex. And sex is the important characteristic. When a transgender person goes to a doctor, the doctor needs to know what their sex is. Because men and women require different treatment from each other in some cases.
When we compile social statistics, we need to know what sex someone is. Otherwise we might as well not do the stats in the first place.
- Status