Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

LydiaDeetzHat

VIP Member
I tried wild for a few months last year during lockdown and hated the bloody thing. It didn't work for me at all. I found the deodorant really oily so that, combined with sweat... gross and uncomfortable. I think their advice is to apply more during the day but I'd have to wipe it all off and reapply from the start due to said oiliness!! The scents are nice though. Dunno if it's just me but my body didn't adapt to it, but I've heard similar from other people.
they're not very oily and some scents can even be a little dry.. might have been the batch if these were all done at the same time,, i have heard from users and them that some people take a couple of weeks or so to get used to transitioning to natural deodrants which seems to involve sweat issues . I;ve never had any trouble nor have a lot of users I know but some took a while for their body to get used. it's not uncommon and not restricted to this brand , but a change from sprays etc to natural..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

emm

VIP Member
I don't like her (she is a right wing nutjob) but some of the points in this are pretty scary
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

HockyRorror

VIP Member
No it's not evil in the slightest. It's perfectly understandable for rape victims to not want to be around people that are obviously men while receiving therapy.








This comment on it is sickening - "So basically women are meant to look like a gender stereotype of they are kicked out - regardless of if they are trans or cis? LMAO"


No. They are not expected to look like a gender stereotype you fucking idiot. They are just expected to BE women.


That’s a councillor for the Green Party saying that. There’s literally a 10+ thread on the site that cannot be named linked with the actual woman involved contributing.

He said something along the lines of if Queen had formed today they'd have to have been more racially diverse. And have a trans person.
If he did say that, tbh, it’s a pretty stupid thing to say (but I haven’t seen the quote).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

FitiverMin

Chatty Member
That’s a tad hyperbolic. But you’re entitled to your opinion.
move got friends who are
Do you not think that having men able to self-ID as women to get into rape support groups constitutes fucking women over? Or elderly women in care homes who aren't allowed a sex preference for those doing their personal care, or even just women wanting to change in a women's-only changing room where staff have been told they have to let in anyone who is carrying clothes marketed as women's? How about young girls who have been brought up as trans because they preferred to play with cars, and the young women who are dealing with the lasting trauma of having their breasts removed as teenagers? I'm glad you personally don't feel we're being fucked over, but some of us do, and I really don't think being concerned about self-ID or the erosion of women's sex-based rights makes me a bigot.
Is that happening? Can you give me an example of women’s sex based rights being violated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

roger_50

Member
Here comes a condescending man into a group of women to contribute nothing besides telling us we're wrong. How terribly surprising.
Only that's not what I'm doing at all.

Jesus. I was just talking about how being a lone gender amongst a group of people from another gender leads to the same sort of group-collective response regardless. It's a valid point.
 

Phoenix Lazarus

VIP Member
But we are a capitalist country and we don’t have these weird obsession with sexualising dolls like this. I mean I hope we don’t have a factory that produces these.
There's also a lot of hungover religiously-inspired Puritanism here. The Chinese were left godless for a long time by Communism.
 

FitiverMin

Chatty Member
Goading, stop trying to provoke
You can include men in your dating pool if you like. It’s entirely up to you. I don’t care who you sleep with. You don’t speak for ME. See how it works?
But standing up for womens rights and insisting on women only spaces/sports is NOTHING like homophobia.
Allowing and encouraging fucking CHILDREN to mutilate themselves in order to trans the gay away - THAT’S homophobia.
ok let’s go back to your hysteria. You feel children are being forced to be trans? I any examples of this ?

Do you know what apartheid was?
Yes do you?

Men in womens prisons (see Karen White).
Men in womens shelters
Men in womens sports.
Men in womens shortlists.
Men in womens bathrooms.
Men in womens changing rooms.
Gun-toting, BDSM-flaunting men becoming girl guide leaders.

For starters.
A ha other than Karen White who have you got as a point
 
Last edited:

weeweegie

VIP Member
Sorry if this has been discussed before but what are people’s thoughts on Arty Morty? I’m listening to the podcast Gender A Wider Lens (definitely recommend as talks about everything we talk about here). And he is a guest on this episode I’m listening to. Looked him up on Twitter and reading some things about him being a AGP apologist but I can’t find what he’s actually said. He’s coming across well on this podcast though.
 

Glortard

VIP Member
“Government sponsored sterilisation” this isn’t even sensationalist this is propaganda?!!

how can you equate BIRTH certificates to sterilisation?!!
They are......we just don't recognise your delusion which is the difference.
 

thegirlscout

VIP Member
I’m much more wary about where I shop now. I body swerved Lush the other day while out Christmas shopping. Never again will I shop in there. Good idea to check the website of a company you’re buying from, it will quite often give you clues if they are pro trans. Like that deodorant company I was going to buy from, until I read on their website they ask all their employees to put their pronouns on their email. Great, I now know not to buy from you, byeee!

* I think they’re called Wild and it’s one of those organic, eco friendly products. Saving the planet but betraying womankind 👎😑
I really like Lush products! I can’t find something similar that is also cute. Just plain round bath bombs etc.
 

thegirlscout

VIP Member
I've just starting watching the documentary about rape on C4 that was on a few weeks ago. 71% of ALL crimes investigated by Avon and Somerset police are sex crimes. That, to me, is even more shocking that the dismal rape conviction rate.
Avon and Somerset police are horrendous, especially with women. They cover such a wide area and don’t really understand policing rural communities. They have already had to refer themselves twice to the IOPC in the matter of weeks because 3 people were murdered (a woman and her husband and another woman a few weeks prior).

Off topic, but when I'm not working I use gycolic acid toner under my arms. The low ph kills the bacteria that cause the BO. Have also stopped using Lush which has cost me my favourite cruelty free perfume
Without sounding like a kill joy glycolic acid will lighten the skin and it doesn’t remove the sweat. I’ve seen it all over social media and I do worry about those with darker skin tones because the lightening effect may become quite noticeable.
 

thegirlscout

VIP Member
There's a response to this linked in the article which is a bit more cautious about the ethical issues around this so at least there's that: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.15482

I'm a scientist myself so just a comment on how papers are published: journals have an "impact factor" which is generally used to denote journals that are more "important" than others or have more influence, with a higher IF having more prestige and being tougher to get published in. The original paper linked is in BJOG with an IF of 6.531.
For reference, the top science journals Nature and Science have 17 and 41. The highest rated journal now is 435.

Just because something is published in a scientific journal doesn't necessarily mean that it's "good science" or will have much influence on the area of research so I wouldn't take much from this one paper.

(p.s. Obviously impact factor is a bit more complicated that this and has been criticised but just my 2 cents)
Thank you for explaining this! Sorry if this is dim but does BJOG mean British Journal? So does that mean the percentages are British based?