Gender Discussion #108

[Dinate]

And talking of gaslighting, this woman is beyond evil. I truly hope that there's a reckoning for her and the damage she continues to cause to vulnerable young people.

 

[IKickLikeKatya]

So the new Health Sec performatively said that he no longer believes that TWAW but the reality is that he still doesn't give a damn about girls and women's rights.

I seriously hate these cowardly people. The open misogyny of these politicians just takes my breath away.

Biscuit boy, as he is now called, has already shown himself to be completely spineless.

 

[maytoseptember]

And talking of gaslighting, this woman is beyond evil. I truly hope that there's a reckoning for her and the damage she continues to cause to vulnerable young people.

She really is a psychopath. The smugness oozes through the screen

 

[Vanelope]

Was it on here someone pointed out Webberley is an engagement farmer and makes money from her notoriety so this sort of thing is rage bait to make her more money. She is evil and the fact she calls herself doctor is infuriating and she is also a troll.

 

[funkimunki1984]

She really is a psychopath. The smugness oozes through the screen

This sickens me how Lush and herself trivialising what women go through to have breasts removed. Adding it to a furry tiger (I’m sure the freaks in the latter part of the LGBTQIA+ mafia adore it) to make it look cute takes away from the pain and horror of it.

My aunt had hers removed due to breast cancer and she said it was the worst pain she’s ever experienced. And many women who choose to have it done to become a man and then regret it. She’s a twit!

 

[maytoseptember]

This sickens me how Lush and herself trivialising what women go through to have breasts removed. Adding it to a furry tiger (I’m sure the freaks in the latter part of the LGBTQIA+ mafia adore it) to make it look cute takes away from the pain and horror of it.

I live in Essex and visit Chelmsford occasionally. The artist in question gets a Pride window display every year. She is a TIF and a furry, hence the tiger imagery.

 

[Sea]

I live in Essex and visit Chelmsford occasionally. The artist in question gets a Pride window display every year. She is a TIF and a furry, hence the tiger imagery.

So she's doubly mentally messed up

On the side, i remember when Mascots conjured up innocent fun costumes be it football mascots/or character like sonic headgehog/paw patrol etc now i just see a Mascot i can't detach my thoughts from creepy furries.

 

[minimaz]

Re the lush thing to me even if we discount its promoting non medically necessary mastectomy. Isn't it glorifying self harm, isn't that what the blue and pink scars on the arms are supposed to represent?

 

[Ekathrina]

My mum who is in her eighties has recently joined a church choir. Lo and behold there’s a TIM in it. Apparently he’s got a big baritone voice but wears mini skirts and great whopping boobs that he likes to display in low cut tops but also a very hairy chest. They really are absolutely everywhere.

 

[Red80's]

So the new Health Sec performatively said that he no longer believes that TWAW but the reality is that he still doesn't give a damn about girls and women's rights.

I seriously hate these cowardly people. The open misogyny of these politicians just takes my breath away.

He's too much of a coward to meet them.

 

[maytoseptember]

Re the lush thing to me even if we discount its promoting non medically necessary mastectomy. Isn't it glorifying self harm, isn't that what the blue and pink scars on the arms are supposed to represent?

I think there’s some plausible deniability going on. I think it is glorifying self harm, because the arm “stripes” match the mastectomy scars. And we know a huge percentage of TIFs self-harm. I once saw someone refer to the glorification of top surgery as a self harm cult, which so depressingly accurate.

But on the other hand, the artist would probably argue the stripes are just tiger stripes, and the only scars we’re supposed to approve of are the zipper bits

 

[Red80's]

Re the lush thing to me even if we discount its promoting non medically necessary mastectomy. Isn't it glorifying self harm, isn't that what the blue and pink scars on the arms are supposed to represent?

I also think the tiger or whatever it is supposed to be, looks like a Furrie. Almost as if they're slowly drip feeding that perverse stuff to their customers, particularly kids, in an effort to normalise it.

 

[TheMiceInTheShed]

He's too much of a coward to meet them.

That sums it up.

Snivelling little wuss.

 

[Piff paff puff]

Was it on here someone pointed out Webberley is an engagement farmer and makes money from her notoriety so this sort of thing is rage bait to make her more money. She is evil and the fact she calls herself doctor is infuriating and she is also a troll.

It's obviously making her a fortune. There is no way she's going to make money anywhere else now notorious as she is. What a sad little life Jane. Imagine if everyone sussed and stopped following her. Unfortunately young mentally ill people will be fooled.

 

[Not Now Bernard]

It's obviously making her a fortune. There is no way she's going to make money anywhere else now notorious as she is. What a sad little life Jane. Imagine if everyone sussed and stopped following her. Unfortunately young mentally ill people will be fooled.

Imagine staying so hard for your A levels/medicine degree and becoming something as prestigious as a doctor. And then eventually reduced to talking nonsensical rit on the internet to pay your bills. Webberly is a total loser.

 

[Weebles Wobble]

I think there’s some plausible deniability going on. I think it is glorifying self harm, because the arm “stripes” match the mastectomy scars. And we know a huge percentage of TIFs self-harm. I once saw someone refer to the glorification of top surgery as a self harm cult, which so depressingly accurate.

But on the other hand, the artist would probably argue the stripes are just tiger stripes, and the only scars we’re supposed to approve of are the zipper bits

I thought the arm "stripes" were meant to glorify self-harm as soon as I saw it. It reminded me of a dreadful poster a few years ago with a photo of a young girl who'd had "top surgery" and also self-harm scars on both arms. It was supposed to be courageous but really it was terribly sad. Can't remember what it was promoting.

 

[maytoseptember]

I thought the arm "stripes" were meant to glorify self-harm as soon as I saw it. It reminded me of a dreadful poster a few years ago with a photo of a young girl who'd had "top surgery" and also self-harm scars on both arms. It was supposed to be courageous but really it was terribly sad. Can't remember what it was promoting.

I know the one you mean. It was Amsterdam Pride IIRC? In no other context would such a terribly scarred young woman have her very deep mental health issues totally ignored. Rainbows seem to erase all common sense and safeguarding.

 

[Gomi goner]

And talking of gaslighting, this woman is beyond evil. I truly hope that there's a reckoning for her and the damage she continues to cause to vulnerable young people.

The use of "Top surgery" makes me absolutely seeth!
If it's so natural and okay, then call it what it bleeping is BREAST REMOVAL SURGERY!
They just love to hide behind distorted and made up language don't they?

 

[Gomi goner]

This sickens me how Lush and herself trivialising what women go through to have breasts removed. Adding it to a furry tiger (I’m sure the freaks in the latter part of the LGBTQIA+ mafia adore it) to make it look cute takes away from the pain and horror of it.

Again, they're hiding the real grotesque nature of this.
If it's really something to be proud off () then why haven't Lush used a real picture of someone? Or at least made the caricature a person and not an animal?
Disgusting cowards.

 

[Falkor]

That thing that never happens has happened again. But some of the comments are gold.