Is this talentless lump still 'a thing'? I had no idea. 
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Is anyone watching the rivals series on Disney+? Emily’s acting is horrendous
Is it any good? There's so much hype about it but I think it will just irritate me.Is anyone watching the rivals series on Disney+? Emily’s acting is horrendous
I'm not surprised her acting is shocking
I’ve never read the book so I didn’t know what it was going to be about or what to expect, just saw loads of hype so thought I’d give it a go. It’s okay, some bits are pretty funny so far but I wouldn’t say it’s great. But people that like the book are raving about itIs it any good? There's so much hype about it but I think it will just irritate me.
I'm not surprised her acting is shocking
I don’t understand this either. She’s literally completely naked in it and has loads of sex scenes
She surely expected attention after choosing to get her cows udders out in a stupid show.
Has she ever done anything that didn't have a focus on her boobs? I mean she's not exactly throwing herself forward for a part in Harold Pinter play or a gritty drama where she plays a downtrodden housewife is she? She takes all of these parts and then seems surprised people talk about her getting her waps out.
She’s not a good actress, so any part she gets is entirely based off her appearance. All of her lines in Rivals are delivered so flatly. Nothing behind the eyes.
Im not being horrible but she's not pretty at all, or funny. Men really are blind.
Nothing to do with her "looks", it's nepotism.
I can see she has an appeal. I think she's pretty and obviously has great bits but Meryl Streep she isn't.
It's not actually what she said in the interview. The DM have stitched it together to make it sound more inflammatory.
Having sex with someone too drunk to consent IS grape. She says a lot of stupid stuff but this isn't stupid
It’s a very problematic subject. Not remembering doesn’t mean you didn’t consent. There have been times when younger I’ve had memory blanks but have apparently been walking and talking etc. She does however go on to say that she knows she’s didn’t say yes, which could be seen as grape. For it to be grape, there would need to be proof that the male party had to have intent to do so. He may have been just as drunk to make the decision and that’s when it becomes difficult to prove that it is grape.
If you're drunk enough to be unable to form memories then you're automatically too drunk to consent to sex, so Q.E.D. if you can't remember saying yes it was grape.
Just to play devils advocate. If the male asks and you say yes but then you don’t remember, where does that leave things? How is the male meant to know you won’t remember later? I am not talking about situations where you’re staggering , slurring etc. and maybe the two go hand in hand and this made up scenario wouldn’t exist. But I just wonder. I know for court, you would need to prove the criminal mindset for the accused.