Em Clarkson #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
C

cee-bee

OppositeFeature said:
What do Em’s siblings do? I know she’s shared them once in a whole on her insta.
Click to expand...
the Clarkson offspring are all fairly lacklustre which is probably why their dad feels the need to brag about not going to Uni, and how much better nepotism is. Because they all appear to have benefitted extensively from nepotism.

Em I think, is the eldest.

Finlo, is the made child and inexplicably, despite no real experience has somehow gone from maitre D at the wolseley (a fancy London restaurant) to a trainee at soho house, to a campaign executive at News Corp, with periods of unemployment in between. Wonder how he managed to make the leap into his latest role?

maybe Finlo “embraced nepotism” like his dad mentions in this rather harrowing and shameful times article, which barely conceals his disappointment in his children for their lack of academic achievement;

IMG_5961.jpeg


Katya is the youngest and the only one to go to Uni. Will her dad still pull strings for her I wonder, since he’s so scathing about Uni and thinks it’s all a waste of time? Maybe he’s changed his mind now that one of his kids inherited their mother’s IQ


Having said that, it’s been two years since Katya left Uni and she has zero employment or jobs listed. Her Instagram shows her mostly travelling, faffing about London in bad makeup trying hard to be quirky. She uses a lot of photography hashtags so maybe she’s trying to carve out a career in that field in a way that’s only available to rich kids and nepobabies. Her insta is katyaclarkson
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
L

lisa.mekh890305

IMG_8475.jpeg

I mean, if I was trying to describe someone as a good mum I’d certainly not showcase that they’re on insta during what seems to be a family lunch. But then it’s hard to show someone is a good mum when they aren’t!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
C

cee-bee

lisa.mekh890305 said:
View attachment 2322874
I mean, if I was trying to describe someone as a good mum I’d certainly not showcase that they’re on insta during what seems to be a family lunch. But then it’s hard to show someone is a good mum when they aren’t!
Click to expand...
It’s a casual lunch in their local Clapham eatery, where a sandwhich costs £15. Em is scrolling on insta looking for negative comments she can attack and belittle..

Suddenly, Alex whips his phone out.

Em knows what to do, bourne out of a decade of doing nothing but scrolling through social media, her influence instincts are finely honed

she quickly picks up her baby, adopting a flattering downward tilt face, eyes cast down and demure - the epitome of a grounded mother.

once taken, em quickly drops arlo in her pram, ready to inspect her creation. They nod: the perfect shot. In agreement, Alex posts at prime workday commuter scrolling time, ready to capture the hearts of the nation.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 18
C

cee-bee

Why am I not surprised that Bully-Vibes Em Clarkson is chummy with Vicki Pattison? VP who has had stories come out about her being a bully at school for years and has been called the least welcoming cast member of Geordie shore, was accused of bullying, convicted of assault but who has since painted herself as a victim of bullying, not unlike Ms Clarkson?
IMG_6660.jpeg


IMG_6659.jpeg
 
  • Sick
Reactions: 3
JulesC

JulesC

cee-bee said:
Why am I not surprised that Bully-Vibes Em Clarkson is chummy with Vicki Pattison? VP who has had stories come out about her being a bully at school for years and has been called the least welcoming cast member of Geordie shore, was accused of bullying, convicted of assault but who has since painted herself as a victim of bullying, not unlike Ms Clarkson?
View attachment 2365922

View attachment 2365920
Click to expand...
Wow Vicky Pattinson is one of the worst ‘influencers’ going. If you haven’t already, check out her threads on here. She’s been through egg retrieval to freeze some eggs and embryos even though she clearly has no intention of having children (thank god) and has purely done it for content/because the clinic have done it for free. She’s vile beyond belief.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 8
L

lisa.mekh890305

It looks like our Emily didn’t like it when someone pointed out that her post on HAGs reads like ‘one action won’t have much impact so don’t feel like you need to do it’ applicable to charities and other good deeds. And why shouldn’t people change their bodies if that’s what they want? Why do they need other motivations too, if they WANT TO change their body FOR THEMSELVES
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 5
C

cee-bee

lisa.mekh890305 said:
It looks like our Emily didn’t like it when someone pointed out that her post on HAGs reads like ‘one action won’t have much impact so don’t feel like you need to do it’ applicable to charities and other good deeds. And why shouldn’t people change their bodies if that’s what they want? Why do they need other motivations too, if they WANT TO change their body FOR THEMSELVES
Click to expand...
have you got screenshots?
---
Ah yeh, that well known phenomenon of predators using AI to access parks 🙄🙄🙄🙄

meanwhile while Em is whipping up this faux hysteria to drive likes, she’s posting her daughters details all over social media.

If she wanted a highlight a real concern, she’d maybe mention that online grooming has increased 80% in 4 years, but then she’d probably be forced to take a long hard look at herself and the risks she exposes to her daughter by posting her details.

the naked man in the park is a risk to children, but it’s not a pressing risk. In reality, something like 90% of predators towards children are known to them or family members, aka not a nudist at the park.

by putting this reel out there, she’s just creating public hysteria (which is low hanging fruit when it comes to taboo subjects like child abuse) and contributing to misunderstanding around what child abuse looks like in reality.

Once again, this woman contributes nothing be empty words and self promotion. I try not to view her insta, but everyone time I get a notification here and I’m reminded she exists, I can’t help but check again and without fail, she has something ridiculous or crappy or misinformed posted. I dread to think what she says on the podcasts I don’t listen to or the other reels I don’t see. She talks complete and utter balls but because she’s got a posh accent, people buy into it.

she’s foolish, uneducated and should probably get off her bleeding self righteous podium that she has never earned the right to be on.

IMG_6927.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
AliceInWanderLost

AliceInWanderLost

cee-bee said:
have you got screenshots?
---
Ah yeh, that well known phenomenon of predators using AI to access parks 🙄🙄🙄🙄

meanwhile while Em is whipping up this faux hysteria to drive likes, she’s posting her daughters details all over social media.

If she wanted a highlight a real concern, she’d maybe mention that online grooming has increased 80% in 4 years, but then she’d probably be forced to take a long hard look at herself and the risks she exposes to her daughter by posting her details.

the naked man in the park is a risk to children, but it’s not a pressing risk. In reality, something like 90% of predators towards children are known to them or family members, aka not a nudist at the park.

by putting this reel out there, she’s just creating public hysteria (which is low hanging fruit when it comes to taboo subjects like child abuse) and contributing to misunderstanding around what child abuse looks like in reality.

Once again, this woman contributes nothing be empty words and self promotion. I try not to view her insta, but everyone time I get a notification here and I’m reminded she exists, I can’t help but check again and without fail, she has something ridiculous or crappy or misinformed posted. I dread to think what she says on the podcasts I don’t listen to or the other reels I don’t see. She talks complete and utter balls but because she’s got a posh accent, people buy into it.

she’s foolish, uneducated and should probably get off her bleeding self righteous podium that she has never earned the right to be on.

View attachment 2384018
Click to expand...
exactly this! i mean, it's hardly. surprising that her stupid questions didn't result in the conversation being flagged, because anyone with even half a brain would recognise that those questions were asked intentionally. because yes, there are major risks with kids using social media, online predators contacting them, fake profiles and grooming behaviour, but none of these predators are going to use snapchat to ask AI if a men are allowed to visit public parks on their own - let need if they wear clothes to a park. if a guy genuinely had the desire to indecently expose himself to kids at a park, I'm pretty sure he would simply go do it. it's not a debate he would have with AI on social media beforehand, so I doubt Snapchat would flag such a bizarre stream of questions as a pressing concern. 🙄🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Bunbun1

Bunbun1

She says she’s having tummy troubles today. I sense a symprove ad incoming. It’ll be something like oh wow I just realised I ran out and haven’t been using it and that’s why… blah blah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
JulesC

JulesC

I stopped following her so actually have no idea what she’s up to. Can’t say I’ve missed her 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3
C

cee-bee

HinchesSousChef said:
This thread has been awfully quiet!
Click to expand...
I unfollowed too. She was just so boring and repetitive. Everything she did was so utterly easy to pull apart, so completely ridiculous. There was nothing intelligent about her worth discussing.

her content is so bad and uninspiring that even tattlers can’t be bothered to comment lol.

I had a quick click on her latest reel and it’s so pathetic in how transparent it is.. the faux wake up (literally filming herself from inside her fridge I mean, really?!) and drinking that bloody symprove… having her butt cheeks out but blurred out so she can stoke controversy and then use that controversy to speak about how much it a pioneer she is for women and their bodies yada yada yada.

she’s just a spoiled, entitled, uninformed (but highly opinionated) rich girl who is probably a little bored, so spends too much time on social media sharing her uninformed opinions. It’s too pathetic to comment on sometimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
JulieScoobyDoo

JulieScoobyDoo

She tagged a PT in her post so it is probably theirs and the inspiration comes from the fact its AD/Gifted. Amazing what you can achieve when you aren't paying for it.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
You must log in or register to reply here.