Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I know the post I saw that prompted me to complete the questionnaire was definitely indicating they were looking for women who had experienced violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I know the post I saw that prompted me to complete the questionnaire was definitely indicating they were looking for women who had experienced violence.
Yes I agree. Very much along the lines of “if you have experienced abuse,please do this survey”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I just saw this on her Instagam,which confuses me. She says that we can't educate ourselves out of misogyny, but that's what her entire company is based on. She develops programs for the police to educate them on misogyny.

Or is this just another case of her changing her viewpoint for the audience?

 
Aww she gets herself in knots doesn't she? So she's evaluated her training programmes and they are ineffective, is basically what she's saying. But she's still flogging them though isn't she? So education isn't the answer, what is then? Exterminating all men? Education IS the answer. Does she mean legislation? Legislation doesn't change attitudes, it just punishes people who get caught, but changing attitudes is when you get real change. While I do agree of course there is institutional misogynism at every level in our society--as there is also institutional racism and classism--shoddy, false, sensationalist research actually does nothing but perpetuate those things. Furthermore, she is benefitting from those inequalities by using them to feather her own nest very handsomely. She abuses women and the less well off (who can't afford to take action against her), young people and even children. Her latest research specifically targets 16 and 17 year olds, and I dread to think what the training she delivers in schools is like; how any headteacher allows someone with no knowledge of or expertise with children in to discuss the most sensitive of subjects with their pupils beats me--she hasn't even brought up her own children. Now she's looking for her next money spinner, she's turning her attention to issues around ethnicity and racism. That makes her exactly what she claims to be against....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Fingers crossed showing herself as an arrogant, under-informed expert on racism will be her downfall.

A white woman "educating" people about the same things black women have been saying for years? Good luck Jess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Jess was (or was cos playing as, anyway) a full on radfem a couple of years ago. We moved in similar circles. She was definitely 100% gender critical. The woman has 0 integrity, clearly. I thought there was something off about her even then but never said anything.
Yes. This was to drum up support for herself. If you look at her social media engagement, it was all about building up a brand and getting traumatised women to respond to her crappy questionnaires and surveys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
She says in this she's worked with women and girls for 12 years. It sounds weird in my ears. Always did when she said this. So vague. Makes it sounds likes she's run a trauma service and supported women, in an extended way, for over a decade.

Doesn't honestly sound possible, and is vague.

It doesn't sound like she has much, or any contact with vulnerable women other than her unboundaried social media communications, which seem to often end badly.

I wander if she considers when a fan reaches out to her, through social media, as working with women and girls.

I'm sure that's not what the listener envisions when she says this. And I think she knows this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Yes. This was to drum up support for herself. If you look at her social media engagement, it was all about building up a brand and getting traumatised women to respond to her crappy questionnaires and surveys.
Exactly, she changes her stance to chase the money. I expect she'll change her stance on trans women when somebody she wants to impress shows views contrary to her own, funding starts to become available, or she realises she needs to widen her fanbase...

She says in this she's worked with women and girls for 12 years. It sounds weird in my ears. Always did when she said this. So vague. Makes it sounds likes she's run a trauma service and supported women, in an extended way, for over a decade.

Doesn't honestly sound possible, and is vague.

It doesn't sound like she has much, or any contact with vulnerable women other than her unboundaried social media communications, which seem to often end badly.

I wander if she considers when a fan reaches out to her, through social media, as working with women and girls.

I'm sure that's not what the listener envisions when she says this. And I think she knows this.
Well she claims that she did manage a trauma service, when she was maybe 18 years old....alongside running the country's court system! Obviously many of the roles she claims to have had have been on a voluntary basis and have been for a few months here and there. She's never actually worked for anybody--certainly in the last 10 years, so who would check on her cv? CVs are only really of interest to a prospective employer, she can lie and exaggerate to her heart's content and nobody will check. I'm not sure anybody else would even be entitled to ask for information like that about somebody.....maybe an investigative journalist will take an interest in her in the public interest, after all a hell of a lot of public funds seems to find their way into her pocket for training various government agencies....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10
.....maybe an investigative journalist will take an interest in her in the public interest, after all a hell of a lot of public funds seems to find their way into her pocket for training various government agencies....
I would LOVE a journalist to investigate this - there is definitely a story there. I know I mentioned Kids Company before but she also reminds me a bit of this woman - anyone remember her??

 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I am do dubious of those GCSE results because she wouldn't have done the course work. They wouldn't have let her just do it on her own at home without attending school. If she was non attending, they wouldn't even have put her in for them.

I think she went to school, maybe she missed a few lessons and inflated that in her head, as she does.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 7
Re :GCSE results, not only does it make me laugh that she puts them her pro website, but they are presented as “13 A-C” grades. I did wonder if that was more 12As and a C, or the inverse (suspecting the latter). Turns out it’s actually 9 GCSEs at B-C (going off the photo above).

God I love seeing fantasists exposed / revealed.

Edit : just read the text - a B+ at GCSE apparently. Which would make her literally the only person to receive such a grade. She can’t even bleeping pretend properly.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
I am do dubious of those GCSE results because she wouldn't have done the course work. They wouldn't have let her just do it on her own at home without attending school. If she was non attending, they wouldn't even have put her in for them.

I think she went to school, maybe she missed a few lessons and inflated that in her head, as she does.
And there is no such thing as a B+ at gcse. Her real grades aren't terrible but of course she had to embellish. I wasn't entered for 2 O Levels due to poor attendance so I know if she had missed as much school as she claims, she wouldn't have been allowed to sit hers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I just looked at the image and saw she did ICT and D&T. Both would have been heavy amounts of course work. Where she'd have been fed what to do throughout the year. There is no way she just turned up to the exams and got Bs when the exam would have been just part of the final grade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
At my time with Victim Focus I was always forced to put Dr Jessica Taylor's name on everything I produced, even if I put Jessica Taylor I was picked up to include 'Dr' . she uses this to over power people
The HR is a sham and inexperienced, the whole company will fold
I know Sally Ann is now in possession of multiple screenshots of some chats about her from Victim Focus work chat
proof staff taken in by Jess's spell talking about finding Sally Anns address to send her glitter and poo. They planned to anon ambush an event Sally Ann was speaking at online recently and joked about being undercover, referring Sally Ann to a 'curd' Jess and Jaimie sat back and joked with them, it made me sick to my stomach. Ive seen private chats of Jess questioning Sally Anns account of abuse and accusing her of making up her story to be 'famous'
I think she thinks SA is some mastermind devising a campaign against Jess, thats shadowing the real evidence SA has been posting
There was super emposed images shared of Rachael Williams and Jess fighting and talks of murder and knives being sharpened
it was extremely toxic and imoral

these are people building a company based on supporting victims
Jess told us Sally Ann was due to be arrested back in May & charged, no proof ever came of this. She spun us the lie SA was a stalker and Jess couldnt believe how stupid she had been to not see it. Theres no proof of any of this. many staff believed what she says. she was fretting SA was going to kill herself over it and she would look bad or get the blame.

I hope Sally Ann get the justice she deserves and reports these. I cant imagine how hurt she and Rachael must feel
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 22
I just looked at the image and saw she did ICT and D&T. Both would have been heavy amounts of course work. Where she'd have been fed what to do throughout the year. There is no way she just turned up to the exams and got Bs when the exam would have been just part of the final grade.
There was a video on her Instagram of her being interviewed in school for a TV show. You know schools only picked the swots for that kind of thing
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
At my time with Victim Focus I was always forced to put Dr Jessica Taylor's name on everything I produced, even if I put Jessica Taylor I was picked up to include 'Dr' . she uses this to over power people
The HR is a sham and inexperienced, the whole company will fold
I know Sally Ann is now in possession of multiple screenshots of some chats about her from Victim Focus work chat
proof staff taken in by Jess's spell talking about finding Sally Anns address to send her glitter and poo. They planned to anon ambush an event Sally Ann was speaking at online recently and joked about being undercover, referring Sally Ann to a 'curd' Jess and Jaimie sat back and joked with them, it made me sick to my stomach. Ive seen private chats of Jess questioning Sally Anns account of abuse and accusing her of making up her story to be 'famous'
I think she thinks SA is some mastermind devising a campaign against Jess, thats shadowing the real evidence SA has been posting
There was super emposed images shared of Rachael Williams and Jess fighting and talks of murder and knives being sharpened
it was extremely toxic and imoral

these are people building a company based on supporting victims
Jess told us Sally Ann was due to be arrested back in May & charged, no proof ever came of this. She spun us the lie SA was a stalker and Jess couldnt believe how stupid she had been to not see it. Theres no proof of any of this. many staff believed what she says. she was fretting SA was going to kill herself over it and she would look bad or get the blame.

I hope Sally Ann get the justice she deserves and reports these. I cant imagine how hurt she and Rachael must feel
She made everyone sign a 'confidentiality agreement' where we had to sign over our moral rights, which allowed her to put her name to anything we did and we had no legal comeback. Anyone that questioned it, became one of the disappeared.

She told us it was a standard contract, but it wasn't.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
The amount she took sounds iffy too, the norm had been about 9 for decades. She took 13 though? Normally only the really good pupils were allowed to take extra, not the ones that were off register for a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The amount she took sounds iffy too, the norm had been about 9 for decades. She took 13 though? Normally only the really good pupils were allowed to take extra, not the ones that were off register for a year.
She only took 8 in reality though. She's such a self aggrandising fantasist
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.