ColaMonster
Well-known member
Who was behind the infamous “Has Spiders stopped ?” Thread?
Yes. Loads of his threads were closed.Did he come up with daft life stories? (I know that doesn’t exactly narrow anyone down when it comes to that place)
I went down on the same post as you I think. Sonething.to do with a sign if I recall. Tanya got us both banned.Thank you so much!
Yep, there was a small group on there that seemed to hate me because I am an Asian person who wasn’t a destitute, poverty stricken loser with no prospects (like them) begging for white “liberal”, “progressive” saviors to rescue me from daily persecution in the “racist” UK and US
They reported MY posts for being RACISTso I got a couple of temp bans and it was obvious I was gonna get a perma ban soon after (which I did, cos I made a couple of posts calling out one or two posters racist comments, plus I told the Tanya person some home truths).
It was really nice that in the run up to my ban I got several pm’s from forum members who were so supportive of me and really sick of how bad things there had become. Sad that a small minority of kooks
I enjoyed my time on AVF but sadly I started seeing similar patronising type of posts, supported by the site owner too, so I took that as my time to leave there.
A woman from the Soap forums also passed away a couple of years ago. I can't remember her username on DS but her username was Blades' Receptionist on the Walford Web forum.
She’s definitely still around. She frequents the Music forum and signs off every single one of her posts with: “God bless you and them* always!!!” (Sometimes she replaces the word them with the name of a particular artist if she is talking about someone or a group specifically in that post)There were a couple of yanks on there.
Sweetheart Holly was one. Use to always go on about some American boy band.
Wasn’t so sweet though if you criticised any aspect of Christianity. She would get very snotty with you.
No idea if she’s still around.
Tanya1982 was a secret mod, I am convinced and always will be!That's the reason why I left and closed my account. The moderation was absolutely appalling and very one sided.
In other words:Looks like Stuart has now lost the plot and has removed a few of the replies to the thread that he started (including the three I posted above) and another brief discussion after someone talked about trying to put him on ignore!He has now decided to lock his own thread. The guy comes across as a total narcissist and clearly can't cope with any criticism.
Stuart Wright said : I’ve deleted the posts which complain about this thread being in GC as they are off topic. Which is most of them, sadly.
And I deleted one reply which contained some links potentially worth exploring but then went and insulted another member.
Despite the title, this shouldn’t be a topic setting one party against another.
I don’t think Gary is anti-labour. I think he has used that video title (which I copied) to get more views. Views are needed if he’s going to get his message out.
I think having a title directly attacking labour might have not been the best strategy.
And using his strategy, I think whichever party had been in power right now, unless they were addressing the wealth inequality issue, their name would be in the title.
I don’t think his message is anti-labour. His message is aimed at labour because they are in power. Obviously.
(He said it was the Tories under Thatcher who cut taxes on the rich in the 80’s which started the decline in the first place.)
And I didn’t post his video to start a party based argument. I didn’t post the thread to criticise labour or any party in particular. Or start an off topic argument.
I posted this here because I think it’s an important message which rings true for me and which, if true, requires a change of policy for whichever party is in power. None of them except the greens supported taxing the rich in the last election.
The part of Gary’s message which most bothers me is that so many people, despite working hard and having a fantastic work ethic, are poor and could never afford to buy a house. I hope that’s a situation which everyone would want to change.
I think it’s best if the thread is locked so that some people who want to make this a party bashing thread don’t get themselves in to trouble and the moderators don’t have to deal with their shit.
Last edited: Today at 2:18 AM
and the resurrected Soap Awards that was also stuck to the top has now been removed. The closing date was 18th July so it must have all kicked off again. In its place, DS Mods have put up a poll about what to do about the soap awards going forward.I
went on that forum recently because I wanted to find out something about an Eastenders episode and saw a mod has made a sticky post telling off members of the soaps forum for starting “soap wars” and threatening bans for those that display toxic and clique-like bullying behaviour(erm, doesn’t that apply to all their sub forums?)
An MN thread title suggestion?Your bum is unlucky![]()
It was complete carnage. Dullire started the DS Soap Awards a few weeks earlier than it normally starts when the regular host, Rita’s Kabin, does it and so people kicked off as it looked deliberate so that he/she could get a head start. But then everyone took sides and DS had to close the thread in the end. That original thread whilst it was still open was a lot of fun as an onlookerAnyone seen the chose about the "DS Soap Awards". The wrong person started the thread, there was a war, and now they are both "hosting" together. What a total shit show. Who cares that much. I had to laugh at Mr.Pitkin telling them all to "GROW UP!!! NOW!!!!" on every second post and Tanya telling a story about the time she hosted an award ceremony and hooked up with whoever it was.