Is it possible that it must be even worse than what people are aware of?Everyone seems to be focusing on the injunction itself and the fact that it is widely reported on SM that it's him - so folks are saying everyone knows it's him so why is he bothering. But for me, it seems to be a case of WHAT the Guardian and ITN are wanting to publish. Whatever it is would appear to be serious enough that he's prepared to threaten to or actually end his life to prevent publication.
People have been aware of his problematic behaviour for some time so what is in this new reporting that makes it so injunction-worthy?