David Walliams #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Amanda Holden was still calling him her “good friend” up until a couple of months ago. There are thousands of celebs that turn a blind eye to this behaviour. Makes me feel ill
I don’t know her irl but I think she’s also a horrible person generally but when ant and dec did a hidden camera thing on her years ago it gave a real snapshot of her true personality.
All of them, bbc, itv, ch4, they all knew what their ‘stars’ are like
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 13
Thank god it’s been years in the making for this to come out.

Im glad some of the sources I provided from my time at BGT were used to get a clearer picture of the POS he was, but I would like to say it’s NOT true that no one complained about him at Fremantle. I raised the fact that he was inviting unchaperoned teenagers into his dressing room at BGT with more senior staff at the time as I couldn’t believe that was something that was allowed to happen but that, as well as his pursuit of a young female runner, were never things that would be taken seriously there. Very much ‘just David being David’ attitude at the time.
To loosely quote Ashley Judd, it takes a village to raise a predator
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
I want to know if the police are investigating him? How many cases? Time for a bit more transparency whilst ensuring support for survivors.

Thanks for getting the noo fred going @Rabbitweed 💪
he is obviously disgusting but the things that are described in the documentary don't sound like anything that can be succesfully prosecuted IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Thank god it’s been years in the making for this to come out.

Im glad some of the sources I provided from my time at BGT were used to get a clearer picture of the POS he was, but I would like to say it’s NOT true that no one complained about him at Fremantle. I raised the fact that he was inviting unchaperoned teenagers into his dressing room at BGT with more senior staff at the time as I couldn’t believe that was something that was allowed to happen but that, as well as his pursuit of a young female runner, were never things that would be taken seriously there. Very much ‘just David being David’ attitude at the time.
I’m sorry nobody took you seriously. I have tried many times to complain about people abusing their power in various situations and each time the organisation has closed ranks around the perpetrators
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 9
I see from X that his house is up for sale - apparently by auction, and already reduced in price. Yours for only £10.5m! Which would suggest an urgent need for cash. I suppose he will have seen a massive drop in income lately now he’s been completely dropped by his publisher and the TV work’s dried up - or maybe he is anticipating being sued. (All speculation obviously).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
he is obviously disgusting but the things that are described in the documentary don't sound like anything that can be succesfully prosecuted IMO.
They don’t sound like the kind of thing which would have someone on severe psychiatric watch either - which makes me think there’s way more to come out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
I don't understand how the media were allowed to be gagged. Has he been charged with anything? And if not, why? Can someone explain because it is mind boggling. Surely if he was under investigation, it would have come out sooner, and if he wasn't, why not? Is it because these things haven't been reported?
It’s very similar to the Brand case -
The investigative journalists gather as much evidence as they can over years, in the case of Brand, the Panorama documentary was shown, the evidence within the documentary then handed over to police and then more victims came to light that enabled him to be charged.

With Walliams he obviously got an injunction when he was approached with the original allegations. Now it’s all out in the public domain, hopefully charges will be forthcoming.

The Times podcast on the Brand trial is very interesting and the investigative journalists talk about how they worked tirelessly for years & years, interviewing hundreds of witnesses and painstakingly put together the Panorama piece. Well worth a listen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Crossover with the juice plus thread here. The tin foil brigade says this is all a conspiracy to put all the good men that speak out against the status quo behind bars. They believe Brand is innocent of course...
 
  • Sick
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 9
His excuse about not breaking the law sounds like “unwise but not illegal” from the other notorious grooming p, last seen whinging on a desert island.

The age of consent is a target for these types, they’re basically pedalo’s let’s be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Hes 100% a groomer. Dirty p. It disgusts me what these men get away with and its not just famous men, its men in all industries the world over. A boss at work who abuses the power over subordinates etc.......... disgusting. This is why women choose the bear and then men get shocked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
His excuse about not breaking the law sounds like “unwise but not illegal” from the other notorious grooming p, last seen whinging on a desert island.

The age of consent is a target for these types, they’re basically pedalo’s let’s be honest.
Can’t believe I’m saying this but in the last few years with Edwards, Wallace, Walliams and Brand, the Schofield stuff seems really small beer by comparison.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 5
They don’t sound like the kind of thing which would have someone on severe psychiatric watch either - which makes me think there’s way more to come out.
I am guessing the doc and events this week might encourage other under 16's to speak to the police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8