David Walliams #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I don't understand how the media were allowed to be gagged. Has he been charged with anything? And if not, why? Can someone explain because it is mind boggling. Surely if he was under investigation, it would have come out sooner, and if he wasn't, why not? Is it because these things haven't been reported?
His behaviour has been super creepy and really wrong. I reckon the snidey twit will have made sure he covered himself by the law.

I reckon in that time he will have been messaging and meeting lots of underage girls and waiting until 16 for them so nothing can ever stick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
My partner made a comment, in response to an investigating officer who made the statement after the Brand verdict, "It just shows, nobody is above the law!" He said one word, "Andrew?" It's good that so many things about the privileged are coming to light and being scrutinized and it's good that Walliams didn't get his way. Censorship of potential crimes should never be bought. However, it seems there will always be some held to be 'above the law.' Only one woman (evil as she is) jailed in the wake of Epstein. I've a long way to go before being convinced that those with power aren't buying or threatening silence.
I completely agree. I am glad Brand was convicted and justifiably so. As far as I'm concerned, it's the tip of the iceberg in terms of celebrity predators. But Andrew still walks free, and no one other than Maxwell has been imprisoned after Epstein. Fishier than a barrel of rotten mackerel.

I don't think the tide will ever truly turn, butI live in hope. And also that, if found guilty, Walliams receives suitable punishment as befits.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 16
He will be churning out the unwise but not illegal line like Schofield did.
People are trying to get the law changed. Currently only a crime if the older person is a teacher or person in authority if the child is 16-18. Imo just because age of consent is 16 there should be laws about such older adults being in relationships with what are still legally children.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
The BBC needs investigating for the sheer amount of sick people they’ve housed over the years. Seriously, how is somewhere that’s paid for by the British public home to so many? And for them to get away with it for so long!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 38
This photo is chilling. From the Guardian article, this young girl was taken to a quiz night. Look at all the adults in the room, and how YOUNG that poor girl is.
IMG_3393.jpeg
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 22
Just seen he has said he is 'devastated that some of the women I met ten to twenty years ago have now expressed hurt or anger towards me'.

Like Brand, trying to get out of scrutiny by saying it happened in the past. Well it still happened, you a, that's the problem!
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 31
So this could turn out to be even worse than Russel Brand if he was violating underage girls. I take it that Brand's victims were at least over the age of consent.

Its high time all these rich elitist guys lost the ability to gag people based on the size of their bank accounts.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
People are trying to get the law changed. Currently only a crime if the older person is a teacher or person in authority if the child is 16-18. Imo just because age of consent is 16 there should be laws about such older adults being in relationships with what are still legally children.
The law definitely needs changing. You can legally have sex with a 16/17 year old but if you have nude/sexual photos of them it's illegal. It's ridiculous.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 17