Yep. I am sick of the cosy industry coming out with faux outrage. All complicit.Interesting in the itv video that Alan Carr also ‘joked’ about walliams’ predatory behaviour, they all knew .
Someone seriously needs to blow the whistle!!
Yep. I am sick of the cosy industry coming out with faux outrage. All complicit.Interesting in the itv video that Alan Carr also ‘joked’ about walliams’ predatory behaviour, they all knew .
I do believe sex addiction is a thing, but that only a few who claim to be so that are actual sex addicts. I quite agree that it's often used as a sympathy tactic and a get-out-of-jail-free card for the most heinous, though.Haha is that the script/novella he wrote about middle aged teachers raping schoolboys at a posh boarding school?
The other thing that stood out to me in the Guardian coverage is Walliams apparently 'admitting' he was a 'sex addict'.
I've met a few so-called sex addicts (I'm in a 12 step fellowship, not for sex but you get people from other fellowships passing thru quite often if they need a meeting and can't find one for their particular addiction that day) and I don't believe sex addiction is a thing. It mainly seems to be a cover for pervos and predators to cloak their nefarious desires in a disguise of 'sickness' so that they get sympathy and don't get questioned too much
Grooming (sexual communication with a child) is a crime, even when there has been no phyiscal contact. I do think it sounds like there would be grounds for these charges. I'm sure there will be worse coming out, disgusting man.he is obviously disgusting but the things that are described in the documentary don't sound like anything that can be succesfully prosecuted IMO.
I think there has to be - otherwise his reaction looks over the top.Grooming (sexual communication with a child) is a crime, even when there has been no phyiscal contact. I do think it sounds like there would be grounds for these charges. I'm sure there will be worse coming out, disgusting man.
Sucking the breast and trying to put your hands down the front of a 15 year old girl's trousers is illegal.I think there has to be - otherwise his reaction looks over the top.
Disgusting as he is, and as horrible as the allegations are, it doesn’t appear SO FAR, that he’s done anything illegal.
But as I've just said, grooming is a crime and it appears that there is evidence of him grooming multiple underage girls and then, once they were at the age of consent, arranging to meet them. That is illegal. Also, according to the Guardian article, he had sexual contact with a 15-year-old. Also illegal!I think there has to be - otherwise his reaction looks over the top.
Disgusting as he is, and as horrible as the allegations are, it doesn’t appear SO FAR, that he’s done anything illegal.
I agree. I actually think 16 is too young, and certainly too young if we’re saying it’s legal and permissible for a much older man to have sex with a girl (or boy, for that matter) of 16.The law definitely needs changing. You can legally have sex with a 16/17 year old but if you have nude/sexual photos of them it's illegal. It's ridiculous.
Yeah but then it's the no true scotsman fallacy isn't it? With other addictions like drugs and alcohol, which are what I'm recovered from, the addictions become physically very obvious when they are chronic. Same with sugar addiction, gambling etc etc. So-called sex addiction, you have no symptoms other than what the person claims, and therefore it gets abused as a disguise so much it's pretty meaningless imho. It's like trans, there is no evidence other than what the person claims.I do believe sex addiction is a thing, but that only a few who claim to be so that are actual sex addicts. I quite agree that it's often used as a sympathy tactic and a get-out-of-jail-free card for the most heinous, though.
In the documentary didn’t it say it was a celebrity’s wife who approached her and told her to be careful?I wonder who the celebrity is I’ve was who approached the young woman at David’s house party and advised her to be careful (paraphrasing)?
Yes I thought I had written that, it is a celebrity wife. my stupid phone is all over the place and I don’t always proof readIn the documentary didn’t it say it was a celebrity’s wife who approached her and told her to be careful?
Meant to say ‘celebrity wife’ , too late to editI wonder who the celebrity is I’ve was who approached the young woman at David’s house party and advised her to be careful (paraphrasing)?