Funnily enough this just cropped up on my Twitter about NZ.
I've just heard in the background that they're discussing 16/17yrs olds having the jab without parental consent.
Honestly, I'm split on this because at that age they can go to the doctors and get the pill and other meds without consent and with complete confidence - which they should be allowed to do.
However, all other meds are discussed at length with all risks disclosed and that's just not happening with the vaccines.
This can also come with some quite serious side effects, so parents need to know why their child might have chest pain or a severe headache, or be losing clots. Girls need to be spoken to about their menstrual cycle and to be extra careful with their contraception - just incase..
If you have a child come from a house that is completely anti jab then that child could be scared in telling their parents the warning signs for fear of getting in serious trouble and warning signs could be missed.
Surely what should be being discussed is that kids of that age can consent, but to advise parents to encourage them to let their kids know they've had it so they can watch them and leave their judgements aside
I had to have that conversation with my nearly 15yr old After reading his letter about the Gillick test.
Ive told him I don't want him having the jab, and what school might do. I've said to him that if he gets pressure then to tell them he wants 24hrs to think about it and to come home and tell me. Then I said that if it gets to the point that he has no choice but to agree to then tell me he had the jab so I can help look after him and watch for side effects.
I've reassured him that I won't be cross with him, but cross with the school. I'm fortunate enough to have an open dialogue with my kids, but I worry for the children that don't.
While doing this test, do they consider children from abusive homes, or children that have MH problems - both of which the school might not know about, or know the full extent of? Its actually terrifying!