Clementine Ford

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She's not going to attack motherhood because she IS a mother. From what I have gathered she's never been married. Maybe she's just jealous of all these people celebrating one thing that she keeps banging on about, love. Sure you can love your "sisters" in your life, but you can also have a long and happy marriage too.

How many (happily) married people are going to read her book and say duck the patriarchy I'm getting a divorce because I don't need to be married. Not many. Is she writing this book for herself so she can believe that marriage isn't for her? Why can't she just do some sponsored pelvic floor post and announce to the world she's ok being single.
That was my point, that she won't critique motherhood because she is a mother. So in black and white thinking, motherhood is good. She says she doesn't want to get married, so all marriage must be bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Sorry to sound ignorant here but how is Amy disabled? I hadn’t heard this before.
And yes seems like clementine is being a real mole to Amy.
Dr Amy Thunig being academically above her probably doesn’t sit too well either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
She also won’t attack the toxic beauty standards that most women feel prone to adhering to as she herself is one of those women…if clem had been married and was speaking from a lived experience I would listen to her more but coming from someone who isn’t married and seems quite bitter, I find her take really one sided.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
I haven’t been paying attention, can someone tell me, is clems book / take on marriage only about heterosexual unions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Genuinely curious to read this because I’m wondering if I could be swayed on her thoughts or if I’d just begin to unpack her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Thank you! I’m interested to see how much it only relates to marriage, or if it is tied more broadly to the general concept of hetero coupledom. I totally get the dark origin and history of marriage, and also the commercialisation of the wedding industry ($$$.) I also understand that finding a partner to settle down with has been a pretty standard societal expectation (along with having kids, buying a house.) I’d argue though, that getting married is probably the least important it has ever been; so will the book take a full swing and delineate from the institution of marriage, and go onto argue that the whole concept of a long term hetero relationship is tied to the patriarchy and doesn’t best serve women? I suppose I’ll have to read the book and find out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Thank you! I’m interested to see how much it only relates to marriage, or if it is tied more broadly to the general concept of hetero coupledom. I totally get the dark origin and history of marriage, and also the commercialisation of the wedding industry ($$$.) I also understand that finding a partner to settle down with has been a pretty standard societal expectation (along with having kids, buying a house.) I’d argue though, that getting married is probably the least important it has ever been; so will the book take a full swing and delineate from the institution of marriage, and go onto argue that the whole concept of a long term hetero relationship is tied to the patriarchy and doesn’t best serve women? I suppose I’ll have to read the book and find out.
I attended a talk she did last year off the back of How We Love, the premise being "to reflect on her work past, present and future" in conversation with a host but she mainly bitched about men and talked about the research she'd been doing for I Don't. It sounded heavily weighed toward being anti long term heteronormative relationships rather than marriage specifically, but I too will have to read the book to be sure 🙂 Her main point seemed to be, why would you engage with it at all if you knew the history? Regardless of your circumstances, if you choose to marry now you're endorsing what it stood for before. (Which I fundamentally disagree with FYI but hey ho.)

The blurb also mentions covering "the physical and social cost that comes with motherhood" so it'll be interesting to see how much she delves into that (harking back to earlier comments noting she doesn't speak out against motherhood, being a mother herself). I don't think that "cost" is marriage's fault by the way; rather capitalism and the way society is structured now. Which I guess you could argue is men's fault, as current society structure was basically established by the patriarchy...... But again, I'll have to read the book 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I attended a talk she did last year off the back of How We Love, the premise being "to reflect on her work past, present and future" in conversation with a host but she mainly bitched about men and talked about the research she'd been doing for I Don't. It sounded heavily weighed toward being anti long term heteronormative relationships rather than marriage specifically, but I too will have to read the book to be sure 🙂 Her main point seemed to be, why would you engage with it at all if you knew the history? Regardless of your circumstances, if you choose to marry now you're endorsing what it stood for before. (Which I fundamentally disagree with FYI but hey ho.)

The blurb also mentions covering "the physical and social cost that comes with motherhood" so it'll be interesting to see how much she delves into that (harking back to earlier comments noting she doesn't speak out against motherhood, being a mother herself). I don't think that "cost" is marriage's fault by the way; rather capitalism and the way society is structured now. Which I guess you could argue is men's fault, as current society structure was basically established by the patriarchy...... But again, I'll have to read the book 🙂
Well said and agree with your points! I think the book will be both interesting but also contentious and while it may be educational (re history etc) I don’t think it’ll totally revolutionise the way marriage is viewed by the majority. It’ll sell though and I guess that’s the point 💸
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I haven’t been paying attention, can someone tell me, is clems book / take on marriage only about heterosexual unions?
I'm assuming so, however there are some people in same sex relationships where one person takes on the more traditional male roles and the other takes on the traditional female role
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
So marriage or a long term relationship with a man is bad…..but motherhood and co-parenting with the father of your child (like she does) is ok? 🥴🤔 Hmmm.

Leave your husbands! Because I say so 🥴
---
I mean motherhood is exhausting and taxing on women’s emotional, financial and physical state…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Thank you! I’m interested to see how much it only relates to marriage, or if it is tied more broadly to the general concept of hetero coupledom. I totally get the dark origin and history of marriage, and also the commercialisation of the wedding industry ($$$.) I also understand that finding a partner to settle down with has been a pretty standard societal expectation (along with having kids, buying a house.) I’d argue though, that getting married is probably the least important it has ever been; so will the book take a full swing and delineate from the institution of marriage, and go onto argue that the whole concept of a long term hetero relationship is tied to the patriarchy and doesn’t best serve women? I suppose I’ll have to read the book and find out.
She said in the podcast about marriage the other day ‘I personally don’t believe that you can make marriage queer”.

She says it right after 4:00 into the clip.

 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Thank you! I’m interested to see how much it only relates to marriage, or if it is tied more broadly to the general concept of hetero coupledom. I totally get the dark origin and history of marriage, and also the commercialisation of the wedding industry ($$$.) I also understand that finding a partner to settle down with has been a pretty standard societal expectation (along with having kids, buying a house.) I’d argue though, that getting married is probably the least important it has ever been; so will the book take a full swing and delineate from the institution of marriage, and go onto argue that the whole concept of a long term hetero relationship is tied to the patriarchy and doesn’t best serve women? I suppose I’ll have to read the book and find out.
I think it's less about marriage per se and more about marriage being a byproduct of patriarchy (from her perspective obvs).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
It is hard to compare same sex unions to a hetero union and the power imbalance that often occurs in a heteronormative partnership won't in a same sex union. Though they obviously can have their own power struggles.

The institution of marriage overall is about power over minority groups, women in this case. But same sex couples were a minority who didn't have marriage as an option until very recently. And that is due to the origins of marriage which is what the book is about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
She said in the podcast about marriage the other day ‘I personally don’t believe that you can make marriage queer”.

She says it right after 4:00 into the clip.

Imagine OTHER people getting married pissed you off this much?! Babe, OTHER peoples happiness and CHOICE to get married is not you.

Its truly not that deep you miserable bleep.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
Yes She also advocated for marriage equality. She is such a contradiction and just seems to jump on any idea that will help her produce content and relevancy.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.