Exactly, that was the conclusion they wanted so they made sure they got that conclusion.it was pre determined from the start that influencers are the victims and tattlers are trolls.
Exactly, that was the conclusion they wanted so they made sure they got that conclusion.it was pre determined from the start that influencers are the victims and tattlers are trolls.
Always challenge AI when it starts talking tit like thisThe show was a waste of time as it was pre determined from the start that influencers are the victims and tattlers are trolls.
Was no point making the show with it so biased and unbalanced.
As an example in the AI world influencers like Dr Jessica Taylor have used their social media to in a way write history that Princess Dickson was killed by relentless abuse on Tattle. Google has lifted the posts of a well known liar who wants to shut down tattle because it exposes her and presented her instagram, substack and facebook posts as proof. None of this is accurate but Dr Jess has a book to sell and loves the attention of making up stuff to go viral. It's disgusting.
View attachment 4058209
exactly, you need to correct itAlways challenge AI when it starts talking tit like this![]()
I do and it backs down instantly, but it doesn't remember that it was caught out making up something or using a dodgy social media post and will tell the next person the exact same thing it first told me.Always challenge AI when it starts talking tit like this![]()
IIRC that depends on the "AI", I think some actually do incorporate feedback to some extent.but it doesn't remember that it was caught out making up something or using a dodgy social media post and will tell the next person the exact same thing it first told
Just had a long chat with Gemini, really pushed back, asked for evidence. By the end agreed that it was a supportive site with good moderation and accepted that its initial response was purely based on google headlines.Always challenge AI when it starts talking tit like this![]()
This is what it told me.IIRC that depends on the "AI", I think some actually do incorporate feedback to some extent.
Having read in the Irish thread, that the email address supplied by GK Barry for tattles right to reply was invalid, just confirms they were not interested in due diligence and producing an unbiased balanced programExactly, that was the conclusion they wanted so they made sure they got that conclusion.
Doing the lord’s workJust had a long chat with Gemini, really pushed back, asked for evidence. By the end agreed that it was a supportive site with good moderation and accepted that its initial response was purely based on google headlines.
Did you actually tell it “you are talking absolute rit”This is what it told me.
View attachment 4058289
Yep, I said as a user of 6 years I didn't recognise the Tattle it was describing and I thought it was absolute rit. I asked for evidence which, it couldn't provide.Did you actually tell it “you are talking absolute rit”![]()
Another one who comes across as not having very much between her ears. I had never heard of her until she turned up on Gogglebox recently, but I can well imagine that it wasn't exactly cutting edge viewing.Olivia Attwood did a similar programme for the BBC about Tattle a couple of years ago
I honestly have never heard of this young girl, that show, or her mother, or GK Barry until she was on IACGMOOH. Therefore I don’t think the threads discussing these people really permeates anything beyond the very tiny communities built up on this site.The show was a waste of time as it was pre determined from the start that influencers are the victims and tattlers are trolls.
Was no point making the show with it so biased and unbalanced.
As an example in the AI world influencers like Dr Jessica Taylor have used their social media to in a way write history that Princess Dickson was killed by relentless abuse on Tattle. Google has lifted the posts of a well known liar who wants to shut down tattle because it exposes her and presented her instagram, substack and facebook posts as proof. None of this is accurate but Dr Jess has a book to sell and loves the attention of making up stuff to go viral. It's disgusting.
View attachment 4058209
It might be worth letting them know, that GK provided an invalid email address for tattles right to reply prior to broadcastHas anyone heard back from the BBC from their complaint? I got the automated reply but it's been a while and no response.
If you haven't complained yet worth doing so for bias or accuracy (it failed on both)
BBC Three / 1st Jul 2026 / GK Barry Toxic gossip
Make A Complaint | Contact the BBC
www.bbc.co.uk
Ofcom haven't replied when I complained about GK blaming the site for suicides and claiming addresses are regularly posted on this morning, but they say don't expect a reply. They did reply when dr jessica taylor started using a girls death but she got MPs to believe her lies.
Probably wishing it was busierI honestly have never heard of this young girl, that show, or her mother, or GK Barry until she was on IACGMOOH. Therefore I don’t think the threads discussing these people really permeates anything beyond the very tiny communities built up on this site.
There may be a morbid curiosity knowing there is a thread online discussing you. However, when G K Barry said she regularly looked at her own thread on here, I was shocked. To me that is a totally perverse thing to do.
Exactly. It does seem to be influencers who are most irked by the site. Very interesting. I wonder why that would be.I tell you what annoys me.
What about the threads that aren't about influencers. What about the supportive trying to conceive threads, or the advice threads, the Sen parents threads. The true crime threads. The politics thread.
We aren't all talking about daft influencers 24/7