I feel for princess's grandparents. Sophie is off spouting that they're toxic and evil when all of them are grieving and this isn't helping anyone.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Tattle user happy showing their face
It was very one sided and a lot of the stuff in the interview wasn’t shown, and the back up that was given for each statement that most of the time people/ mods/ users stop comments about children. The interview wasn’t shown in full it was 40 mins of talking sticking up for tattle edited into 3/4 mins
Are you the tattler so?
Are you a spyTattle user happy showing their face
7 yrs of Tattle silence to only post two comments??For anyone not on the Dr Jess Taylor thread she's claiming to have worked on this for months despite filming for it, not being featured and not being credited
She lies about everything!
She lies about everything!
Dr Jessica Taylor and VictimFocus #14 I've yet to meet anyone who didn't find her a dishonest, unprofessional fantasist
lmao I bet that’s going to boil her piss Maybe it’s the same people who took the books?
tattle.life
I assume an investigation into why is incoming.For anyone not on the Dr Jess Taylor thread she's claiming to have worked on this for months despite filming for it, not being featured and not being credited
She lies about everything!
Dr Jessica Taylor and VictimFocus #14 I've yet to meet anyone who didn't find her a dishonest, unprofessional fantasist
lmao I bet that’s going to boil her piss Maybe it’s the same people who took the books?tattle.life
Ooh the comments on the This Morning instagram post with this clip on are quite funny and quite alarming.
There’s one one there calling us bullies because we laughed about Stacey Solomon getting a free Sunday roast
there’s quite a few people going ‘it’s gossip
’
one man is alleging bowelbro stole his life savings
one woman is like ‘it’s a site of negativity and nastiness (paraphrasing)’ and someone’s went ‘no it’s not’ and she’s replied ‘well it’s not like there are any positive filled threads and comments are there?’ And the person has went
‘there’s literally an entire rave section with four hundred thousand comments on it’
DEAD!
There’s one one there calling us bullies because we laughed about Stacey Solomon getting a free Sunday roast
there’s quite a few people going ‘it’s gossip
’one man is alleging bowelbro stole his life savings
one woman is like ‘it’s a site of negativity and nastiness (paraphrasing)’ and someone’s went ‘no it’s not’ and she’s replied ‘well it’s not like there are any positive filled threads and comments are there?’ And the person has went
‘there’s literally an entire rave section with four hundred thousand comments on it’
DEAD!
I’d ask whether there is an increase in traffic of people coming to check out the claims the documentary is pushing, but people would have actually had to sit and watch it for that to happen.
The fake tattler being interviewed,
made me cringe!
made me cringe!
I just watched it.
What the actual duck was that?
And not even grasping the language used when you aren't logged in is different to that when you are. No sneaky editing going on at all.
Embarrassed for all who were involved.
What the actual duck was that?
And not even grasping the language used when you aren't logged in is different to that when you are. No sneaky editing going on at all.
Embarrassed for all who were involved.
Did the BBC actually fund it?
I'm just popping on to check that my thinking's right- the 'keep it on Tattle' means don't contact celebrities directly or post private details that aren't already in the public domain, doesn't it? So writing a letter to the BBC is fine, I assume. I feel a rant coming on and just wanted to make sure I wasn't breaking any rules (as unlike ALL the influencers objecting to Tattle I believe obeying the rules and doing the right thing).
Anyway the influencers are not the important ones in this sorry saga, they're not a supposed British Institute with years of experience in the legal and ethical standards required in investigative journalism.
Last thing, which has been mentioned several times on these threads- surely a programme featuring the mother of a child who died by suicide will be detrimental to the Inquest? It's unethical if not illegal, surely?
It's absolutely shameful of the BBC and makes me doubt many of the other documentaries I have watched on there. I honestly don't know what to believe anymore.
Anyway the influencers are not the important ones in this sorry saga, they're not a supposed British Institute with years of experience in the legal and ethical standards required in investigative journalism.
Last thing, which has been mentioned several times on these threads- surely a programme featuring the mother of a child who died by suicide will be detrimental to the Inquest? It's unethical if not illegal, surely?
It's absolutely shameful of the BBC and makes me doubt many of the other documentaries I have watched on there. I honestly don't know what to believe anymore.
They commissioned it, they paid Full large TV to make it
I just had a look back to refresh my memory. Bowel Bro first came up on the Cancer Influencers thread. His story / behaviour was called out multiple times. He would delete his account for a day or two then come back as a commander of men refusing to be silenced. He was shown sympathy from those who questioned his story alongside his supporters, regardless of his attitude to people.
Someone posted he was getting close to 10k followers and being able to have his own thread, within an hour he was sponsoring posts. Pic proof available.
The attacks on his house etc were before he was known on Tattle. Additionally he had been noticed by other online forums who seemed far more invested.
The biggest question was about the money raised. Around 60k GFM. Him and his wife went on a private Caribbean island honeymoon all first class, bought a Ferrari, Wimbledon in matching Burberry outfits… claims of being a millionaire.
Very similar to Ashley Cain and Saf, the money was promised to help others when he was called out for being able to afford treatment. Again a forensic accountant could help out here.
The comments and letter to his wife are both sickening and evil. However, I very much doubt they came from a tattler
Someone posted he was getting close to 10k followers and being able to have his own thread, within an hour he was sponsoring posts. Pic proof available.
The attacks on his house etc were before he was known on Tattle. Additionally he had been noticed by other online forums who seemed far more invested.
The biggest question was about the money raised. Around 60k GFM. Him and his wife went on a private Caribbean island honeymoon all first class, bought a Ferrari, Wimbledon in matching Burberry outfits… claims of being a millionaire.
Very similar to Ashley Cain and Saf, the money was promised to help others when he was called out for being able to afford treatment. Again a forensic accountant could help out here.
The comments and letter to his wife are both sickening and evil. However, I very much doubt they came from a tattler
If you read the comments on the This morning post on Instagram there is a man who is alleging that bowelbro stole savings from him. It is far more likely to be someone like that than a random tattler sending him letters.
I like when she uses Reddit posts as proof as how awful tattle is.
Looking at iPlayer today and you'd have to dig to watch this as it's nowhere near the front page (for me at least!), seems like the BBC have already buried it!
Also, when GK reads the Zero Tolerance statement from Tattle she immediately reads it incorrectly 'we allow' not 'we have', did they not think to do another take
Also, when GK reads the Zero Tolerance statement from Tattle she immediately reads it incorrectly 'we allow' not 'we have', did they not think to do another take
I think it seemed like a good idea last year with all the sensational articles where influencers went wild with the most outlandish claims.
Once you actually look into it you realise all the loudmouths shouting off about tattle were either lying or hugely misrepresenting. But they'd already got it commissioned.
Then all you have left is a gossip forum that's very worst content isn't really that bad in the grand scheme of user generated content.
Subtitles not available does show that even with what they were left with it still had to be cut last minute.
Once you actually look into it you realise all the loudmouths shouting off about tattle were either lying or hugely misrepresenting. But they'd already got it commissioned.
Then all you have left is a gossip forum that's very worst content isn't really that bad in the grand scheme of user generated content.
Subtitles not available does show that even with what they were left with it still had to be cut last minute.