It's essentially become a witch hunt at this point, and no matter what does or doesn't come out the response will be "the bbc are protecting perverts!"
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
new thread title
"BBC PREDATOR STILL NOT NAMED "
"BBC PREDATOR STILL NOT NAMED "
The sun can't say if there's under age images, because that's a police matter. We've had all this before a few times! There won't be any evidence published because it's evidence!
who else is dreading their weekly round up report of time spent on their phone/iPad
Relatively low, but it also wouldn't surprise me much.
They would have to, because it's a police investigation now.
This is wild I literally cannot keep up with the threads!!
We need to establish a scale from 1 to Ian Watkins / Jimmy Savile, and determine where Prince Andrew, Philth Schofield, and BBC Newsperson each sit on that scale. Seems to me they're all three about the same level of unwise but not technically illegal, or unwise but only borderline illegal. Prince Andrew's case is really only different because snapchat and tiktok didn't exist yet.
Getting a lot of work done at your "local builders' merchants", are you? Yet another extremely long and detailed analysis from your relentless, unchanging, perspective.
Because it's a police investigation now, so any facts that are considered incriminating can't be revealed.
nothing at the TheSun or ANY newspaper ever makes sense though - its headlines thats make money .Is it?I love how The Sun pretends to be offended by the fact the presenter may have broken lockdown rules when deputy editor of The Sun James Slack broke lockdown rules at his Downing St. leaving-do as communications chief for Boris.
also im not convinced it was HUW EDWARDS - my money would be on Graham Norton - theres something unsavoury about him .
I would imagine it also comes down to money, not everyone can afford a lawyer.
I don’t agree with the ‘he should top himself and the like’ comments sorry but if he hasn’t done anything illegal (yes morally wrong) why should he end his life over all of this, as a man who has been very open about his MH attempting suicide because some people think he should is just quite frankly vile. IF he has done something illegal by all means he should be punished but id much prefer to see him lose his career and be sent down for his crimes than end his life. I don’t feel sorry for him at all and never will, he is still a a dirty old perv (and potentially) may have committed an offence but let’s not start debating if he should take his own life.
What a cuntish thing to say! Justice for what? Buying nudes off a young guy, something that so many people are doing nowadays via OF?
What about "LATEST BBC PREDATOR STILL NOT NAMED"
really make it clear that this isn't the first time for the esteemed organisation.
But this person exercises impeccable judgement in their job. That much so they are respected by their employer to be given the public facing role they have and the huge responsibilityit comes with. (if who it is alleged)
I dont get it at all.
Something isn't right here.
And I'm not making light of it or defending any actions or being disrespectful to any victims here....just the why child in me is struggling with the WHY? And is the answer to the why worth the loss of everything?
I’m just here pretending to work while awaiting a consignment of more juicy DMs sent by the BBC presenter.
Off topic, your pro pic and name are
On the help/admin thread this morning, tattle says the search function has been disabled for a couple of days. Must have been badly clogging up the system - probably people looking for ' that' pic...!
Thanks
I thought it was because they were trying to distance themselves from the initial claims in case civil action was taken against them.- Status