BBC Presenter scandal #7

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The fact is the BBC Predator contacted a young man on instagram and was initially turned on by his instagram pics

he started offerring money because he wanted nude pics


and now all these other young men coming forward - its clear there is a BBC Predator with a lust for young men .

WE SIMPLY MUST HAVE JUSTICE THIS TIME - THE BBC HAS PROTECTED PREDATORS FOR TOO LONG
is this a proven fact at the moment though?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
It’s been getting on for a week and the actual known facts seem fewer than they were at the start.

Yep. As I've said a few times now, people are relying on chinese whispers and choosing not to do any analysis or fact-checking of their own. It's disturbing to see how easily some people will just accept the first thing they hear as gospel.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
I posted on here about two hours ago but it didn't appear so heaven knows what I said now. Anyway I'm another who's erring on the side of caution here having learned the hard way not to believe everything you read without any evidence. The fact the police said that was no case to answer and that this all came out totally swallowing the George Osbourne email (although there's no evidence for that either) says a lot.

One of the "victims" is in his 30s and laughing about it (a "bad boy" message). It strikes me based on the evidence we have in front of us that this is a man chasing men on the side. The fact he's gone on LinkedIn doesn't scream "pon" to me (and the random flinging around of that vile term isn't helpful). It's sad and pathetic and I feel very sorry for his family but I also do feel sorry for him.

If someone threatened to out him I'm not surprised they got a mouthful. I'm not sure what they thought he'd do, although it is foolish of him to make himself vulnerable in the first place.
I don‘t believe the 30 year old claimed to be a victim, not in the way you are suggesting anyway. His arrogance was what made him ‘vulnerable’. How do we know some of his victims weren’t vulnerable, did her care about them, I don’t think so.
I think it’s generous of you feel to sorry for him, I don’t. I didn’t dislike him before all this (quite the opposite), but his continuing to like tweets after this story broke was the final nail in the coffin for me, it came across as arrogant/narcissistic, to me anyway. I will save my empathy/sympathy for people more deserving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
We'll see won't we
Gave the boy money just for chats did he
He was on zoom in his underpants to read him the news?
Alot of victims of grooming deny what happened at first because they have been groomed into thinking the person cares or wants a relationship with them
No need to get personal, not everyone on zoom in their underpants is up to no good ….😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 20
We'll see won't we
Gave the boy money just for chats did he
He was on zoom in his underpants to read him the news?
Alot of victims of grooming deny what happened at first because they have been groomed into thinking the person cares or wants a relationship with them
He wasn't underage, though. So nothing illegal has taken place. You're basing the fact that the alleged victim was underage based on an initially completely unreliable claim from the unreliable, estranged mother and the original Sun report, which they are now refuting.
There is literally nothing to suggest the images were illegal, and going by the Instagram chat from accusation No. 4, it seems that the presenter lost all interest as soon as the individual mentioned they were still in School.

You should acquaint yourself with the most recent developments.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
Gave up trying to read this yesterday evening. Did I miss anything exciting? (Sorry I know this is really lazy). If guests could all just stick to Twitter so I can personally carry on gossiping that would be wonderful!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 8
We'll see won't we
Gave the boy money just for chats did he
He was on zoom in his underpants to read him the news?
Alot of victims of grooming deny what happened at first because they have been groomed into thinking the person cares or wants a relationship with them
we don’t know why he gave him money.
we don’t know how old he was when he was sat in his skivvies.

Is it all as seedy as seedy can be - of course. Has anything actually chargeable gone on - as yet not known.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
yea super basic thread title only search is, not the advanced search where you could search for words within actual threads or particular forums
That uses a lot of server bandwidth, which is why they disable it at times when there's a lot of traffic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
We can hope. At least that will save numerous lads from being preyed upon because I have absolutely no faith he'll ever face actual justice.
In what world is it ok to hope someone kills themselves? As it stands there is no evidence he has done anything illegal.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
Sun is now also furiously backpedalling.
Is it? :LOL: I love how The Sun pretends to be offended by the fact the presenter may have broken lockdown rules when deputy editor of The Sun James Slack broke lockdown rules at his Downing St. leaving-do as communications chief for Boris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.