Neither of which have been confirmed as being true though.I’ve got to admit. After everything there’s still two aspects that doesn’t fit.
1. ‘What have you done’.
2. ‘Tell your mum to call off the investigation’.
Neither of which have been confirmed as being true though.I’ve got to admit. After everything there’s still two aspects that doesn’t fit.
1. ‘What have you done’.
2. ‘Tell your mum to call off the investigation’.
I had a revelation like that a while ago. Just to let you know lol - it us not just tattle that it works on! Who knew?! On a related note, my contribution would be that whichever way this case goes, I blame the BBC as if they had just done what any normal HR dept would do and suspend the person and investigate as required, none of us would be here right now. This all lies with them.Well after the rollercoaster that has been the last few days, my contender for the biggest revelation:
If you drag the screen down on your phone on tattle, it refreshes. Mind blown.
Just realised I also need:
Fiona Bruce: Vicky McClure
Jeremy Vine: Matthew Macfadyean
Nicky Campbell: John BarrowmanJust realised I also need:
Fiona Bruce: Vicky McClure
Jeremy Vine: Matthew Macfadyean
So why didn't he come out at the start and say this is all lies , I have done nothing wrong, I don't know these people.....like you would do if it was all a made up.Let’s just say that Huw hasn’t paid anyone off and this whole thing is just a fabrication stirred up by a troubled mother… Can you imagine how awful a situation Huw is in now? Career potentially ruined, dignity lost, relationship with his wife and children ruined. It doesn’t bear thinking about.
The crackhead’s mum’s inverted snob friendI hear Meghan Markle is looking for work.
This reminds me of that time Leslie Grantham got his gob out over webcam in his BBC dressing room even though it is nothing like that time, it’s just that that whole thing came into my head and I thought everyone else should experience my pain.
Mum's never smelled weed before and instantly assumed the pungent aroma must be crack.I'm going to put my money on this one, tbh. I think Mum doesn't approve of him or her doing online (and/or in person SW), +/- other "lifestyle" things and he or she has gone no contact. Mum has subsequently gone for the nuclear option with not all the facts completely available to her.
Son or daughter has no moral or other qualms about what they're doing, is perfectly happy with their lifestyle and doesn't want to be dragged into all of this.
At least, I do hope that's the case because if not she's given a false affidavit, and since The Sun could still be in trouble here, I don't think that's going to go well for her.
I was referring to this article and just saying that on the off chance that there are any further nude pics, I don't want to see them, didn't meant to panic youWHAT THE duck
Well considering the Sun said RIP to the very much alive teacher who was stabbed today, I’m not taking what they say for gospel!So I’ve not had chance to catch ip on the last 20 pages since this breaking news but something that has made me think
1. If the story is complete BS then surely the presenter will suing the ass off the mother for defamation of character. If he does then I will believe his innocence. However if he doesn’t…
2. The Sun are surely not so stupid to run a story without solid proof. Especially since last mistakes???
Stephen Merchant would make a good sun journalist after his serial killer roleJust realised I also need:
Fiona Bruce: Vicky McClure
Jeremy Vine: Matthew Macfadyean
This reminds me of that time Leslie Grantham got his gob out over webcam in his BBC dressing room even though it is nothing like that time, it’s just that that whole thing came into my head and I thought everyone else should experience my pain.
That’s true. I mean, every news station has reported on it. So if it was false, I would expect them to refute it as quick as they did HE Peachy backside.Neither of which have been confirmed as being true though.
I will have 100% spelt it wrongOn a completely unrelated note, I'm loving some of the ways I've seen "defamation" spelt over the last few days.
Because it wouldn't change people's opinions at all?So why didn't he come out at the start and say this is all lies , I have done nothing wrong, I don't know these people.....like you would do if it was all a made up.
It could be that he was getting so much hate via DMs that he deactivated it. Also, some weirdos will start photoshopping his face on to things and his family will be targeted. Even if he isn’t innocent, his family shouldn’t be published everywhere. Imagine if he is innocent and he’s had to deal with all this tit.The deleted IG makes me wonder if he thought that it would delete evidence of him allegedly messaging other young people
You've pretty much hit the nail on the head there. The damage is done.Presenter and a young person exchange messages.
Presenter pays to see their bumhole.
Young person wants more money.
Presenter gets pissed off.
Young person's mother finds out and goes ballistic.
Press find out.
Tattle goes mental.
Young person realises their meal ticket is out the window.
Young person backtracks and suddenly has money to pay for a lawyer or finds one who is willing to take the case for free (!).
Presenter's career is still screwed.
Young person gets no more money.
There is no good outcome for anyone except gossips.
Fin.