BBC Presenter Scandal #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Omg what did you say 😭?! Let me guess, the person leading the lawsuit is Jeremy Vine 🙄

As for HE liking those tweets, I’d say that’s a really stupid move. If he’s indeed ‘the presenter’ then he must have full confidence that The Sun aren’t waiting in the wings ready to drop incriminating evidence against him. If he’s not the accused, then he’s inadvertently sided with the accused which won’t work in his favour if it turns out this young man is being paid off or that there’s still damning evidence yet to be made public.
I didn’t say much tbh I just said I think it’s HE and then I had multiple people saying I’m going to get sued for this and that I was like … ok good luck with that 🫡
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Ok, so I am probably totally reading into things way too much here but…a few threads back someone posted a tweet of something said to HE back in May that says “today is the day” and GN has posted a story 5h ago to insta saying “today is the day”. So basically it’s not GN and he’s sending a subliminal message that it’s HE. Or I clearly need to get off maternity leave and go back to work
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 11
If someone had told me last week that my dad would whatsapp me a picture of Huw Edwards's bum, I would've thought they were smoking crack but here we are. Absolute madness!


 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 47
The tabloids are sitting on all kinds of tit I would imagine, what we want is the Julian Assange or Edward Snowden of showbiz gossip to hack them and then just dump it all out in one go. That would be hilarious ... TV and Radio would have to be taken off the air I reckon....and Parliament would probably go down the toilet too. :LOL:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 16
I strongly urge anyone on any sort of medication to take it now, no heart attacks on my watch please. The excitement factor is REAL
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18
The point is that Johnny Depp v The Sun was not about whether he was an abuser or not, it was whether The Sun had a reasonable expectation that he was based on the information they had at the time they printed the article. The US trial was a different issue as that was about whether he had abused Amber Heard and it was clear to any reasonable person that followed the trial that Amber was the abuser.
I thought it was The Mail Online? Not The Sun?
 
Thanks. So much information and I took my eye of the ball for a few hours ... now I have no idea what's going on :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
I've been off and on here all day because I've been killing time, even I'm shell shocked. If I'd stopped for a few hours I'd probably need oxygen and sedation right now.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
So Vanessa is raising questions about who is paying for this young person's expensive lawyer. This is the same Vanessa who supported Schofield, the very man who has been helping with his victim's legal fees! So she will defend an ITV perp but not a BBC one. Vile.

Vanessa on TalkTV - Twitter
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 21
Usually hate my 2 hours journey back up north from London but it's gone mega quick today with all the tattle scrolling 😂
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 16
sorry haven't caught up as it's literally impossible to, but as someone who's been SA'd has it not been considered that perhaps the young person involved just doesn't want all this to come out? like, i personally never involved the police as i didn't want to relive everything, and would probably brand my mum telling others my situation as 'rubbish' too if i didn't want it to get out

(sorry if i've got the wrong end of the stick as i've only skimmed through articles)
I agree.

I was in an ‘unwise but not illegal’ relationship from the age of 18, during which I was subject to both SA and coercive control.
When I eventually saw the light and left, my parents found out part of what happened, which I’d confided in a friend. My father decided that I needed to talk to my (male) GP about it.
I denied everything and refused to discuss it. Because I did not want anyone to know. I was still firmly in denial about it all, too, and blamed myself. But mostly I didn’t want anyone to know.

For telling the GP beforehand and forcing me to go, I hated my father. And for breaking my trust, I couldn’t forgive my friend, even though she was trying to help.

So even if this was all totally legal, consensual, and ‘just unwise’, who would want their private life being shared by a parent?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 19
But the mother can’t be doing it for money surely as she refused any payment from The Sun for the article she just wanted the man punished for what he had done? That doesn’t scream money grabbing to me.
Now the BBC have got involved and all of a sudden this kid has a lawyer (how?) denying anything happened and the police said they’re not investigating criminal charges merely based on just having a zoom call with the BBC? I know who stinks of 💩 most for me and it’s not the mother! It’s going to get covered up like JS! ☹
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
HE liking those tweets is a statement in itself when he's the main suspect... it's more or less confirmed atp imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I get that, but why only Instagram but not Twitter? That doesn’t make sense to me, unless deleting the Instagram account anonymises some spicy DMs that you had exchanged with people… and that was your preferred medium for exchanging said spicy DMs…I’m
I really don’t know, I did wonder if it was something to do with him being inundated with DM’s.

But, really, I just wanted to say that I can’t cope with your profile pic 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.