BBC Presenter Scandal #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Don’t worry about it, you will get free nosh, WiFi and TV in prison and not have to pay for the BBC licence fee
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I think it's important to remember that the victim is possibly still being manipulated by the presenter.

If what the rum said is true regarding the phone calls, that would scare the tit out of anyone enough to make them shut up, especially if they've been paid off too.

This whole situation is super messy and I feel for everyone involved right now. The parents for being pushed to go to a paper due to their concerns over their child, the child at the middle of all this who, if everything is true, was groomed and exploited, and the presenter since right now, there isn't any proof of wrongdoing.

Obviously if proof does come out that the parents are right then the presenter deserves everything coming to them, including facing a court trial. If there isn't any proof, and the parents are lying, then this has just ruined an innocent man's career, especially if the name being banded around isn't the right person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
This is an absolute ride, I can't remember another story of this magnitude with this many twists at this pace.
Even the Jack Monroe threads mid-chaos don’t move this quickly. Might have to call in sick tomorrow.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 26
So why are we only hearing this now, conveniently just as the 6 o clock news is starting? I thought they went through a lawyer today? So many different contradictions my heads spinning! I thought the Alice Evans thread was a mindf**k!
Because it isn’t in The Sun’s interest to have this information in the public domain. The BBC would be far more legally responsible and only make information public on a need-to-know basis. That’s the difference between gutter journalism and responsible behaviour.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
I think it's important to remember that the victim is possibly still being manipulated by the presenter.

If what the rum said is true regarding the phone calls, that would scare the tit out of anyone enough to make them shut up, especially if they've been paid off too.

This whole situation is super messy and I feel for everyone involved right now. The parents for being pushed to go to a paper due to their concerns over their child, the child at the middle of all this who, if everything is true, was groomed and exploited, and the presenter since right now, there isn't any proof of wrongdoing.

Obviously if proof does come out that the parents are right then the presenter deserves everything coming to them, including facing a court trial. If there isn't any proof, and the parents are lying, then this has just ruined an innocent man's career, especially if the name being banded around isn't the right person.
Apparently HE phoned the lad on Sunday which implies he might not have already known about the Friday Denial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I really hope something comes from this story. Either it’s proven that it was all factitious lies, conjured up by someone who was abetted by The Sun and this leads to The Sun being sued or dissolved in a similar fashion to News of the World or The Sun go public with these receipts they are supposedly in possession of and drag this alleged pon. It can’t just fizzle out into nothingness. I simply won’t allow it 😅
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
Why if you do a search for Graham Norton it says he has been suspended for sexual misconduct occurring in May.....
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 12
This site always goes glitchy for me when a lot of traffic is going on one of the threads? Is it the same for anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
A legal experts on Sky News said that it's very interesting that the word 'rubbish' has been used in the letter from the child's legal representative. He said that word has been chosen deliberately, meaning that the claims written in the Sun are not all false; he said if they had been false, a stronger word would have been used to categorically denied them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Just popping in to clarify something ... what age is the young person?

I thought they were 17 now I keep seeing 20.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.