I wondered if perhaps he’d been warned by the lawyers he could also face charges if he’d blackmailed the presenter. But you‘ve made a very good point. You can understand why the young lad wouldn’t want to take it further with how some people are now going for his parents blood on this thread and SM.sorry haven't caught up as it's literally impossible to, but as someone who's been SA'd has it not been considered that perhaps the young person involved just doesn't want all this to come out? like, i personally never involved the police as i didn't want to relive everything, and would probably brand my mum telling others my situation as 'rubbish' too if i didn't want it to get out
(sorry if i've got the wrong end of the stick as i've only skimmed through articles)
I thought it was The Mail Online? Not The Sun?
Still waiting on Paul Breach’s response to this whole saga.I need a nap.... At first glance I thought Sky were interviewing CLA
Or 3, someone elseThe picture can only come from one of 2 sources. The boy (who’s claiming all this is fake) or the mum.
I miss the old days when Instagram likes were public too… found out a lot about people because of that feature….A lot of older people don’t realise their Twitter likes are public
Well according to Twitter he's had interactions with multiple young men in the pastThe picture can only come from one of 2 sources. The boy (who’s claiming all this is fake) or the mum.
Yeah, I think it’s more likely to be photoshopped than AI or a deep fake.AI generated pictures are normally very bad with hands. I'm 50/50 on the validity of that picture but I need more analysis on the lighting and textures and whatever than running it through some app to say it's definitely fake
If I was in the public eye I would probably have a fake twitter and pay someone to do my real socials. Bit strange he’s liking them posts tbh.A lot of older people don’t realise their Twitter likes are public
I think they might have seen the Schofield scandal and misunderstood what he was fired for? They may have thought he was fired because it's shameful that he was carrying on with a teenager and lying to the public. But in fact that case is different because it was going on in the workplace and bosses were turning a blind eye to the welfare of the young employee, while Phil used his power to make or break the lad's career. The mum may think this is a Schofield situation, but in HR terms it's not.I would imagine the relationship between the child/ young adult victim and their parents is destroyed, they probably didn’t realise the police would become involved. Why did they think an employer could stop an employee giving money out, or be in control of the investigation which is what it looks like they wanted. HR is much more complicated than just sack someone.
I can only imagine how many crazies call into the BBC with spurious 'complaints' about their presenters on a daily basis. Suspending a presenter simply because somebody mental accuses them (baselessly) of something would probably leave them a little short staffed, I'd imagine.The BBC mustn’t of handled it correctly because he wasn’t suspended pending investigation in May, he carried on doing his presenting and was allowed to go to awards etc.. and also carried on sending money after the reports was made.. so he obv wasn’t investigated properly or he just wasn’t arsed that the mother had put a complaint in.
Or, if it's fake, someone else trolling.The picture can only come from one of 2 sources. The boy (who’s claiming all this is fake) or the mum.
yup barmy mother lets keep with the parent blaming. The Woman has gained nothing from going to the BBC & The Sun in fact it looks like she's prob pushed her Son further awayI already know I'd be wasting my time with you. That's a given
And your assumptions about me are way off and quite vile.
Unless more substantive information comes out tomorrow, this whole disgusting saga should be a lesson in how mother doesn't know best, that females no know more than males, that misandry leads to a lot of false accusations based on almost nothing (nothing!), and that an innocent man has potentially been pushed near the edge because of a barmy mother going cap-in-hand to The Sun of all places! I assume The Times told her to sod off, or perhaps she is a Sun reader.
The Daily Mail don't like the BBC very much.I’ve just read the Daily Mail and it said the police are not looking into any criminal charges after having just a Zoom meeting with the BBC
The crossover we all need to seal the absolute media chaos of the last 24 hoursI need a nap.... At first glance I thought Sky were interviewing CLA
The only article I could find was thisWhy if you do a search for Graham Norton it says he has been suspended for sexual misconduct occurring in May.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?