BBC Presenter Scandal #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts

Rosie glow

So now the young person has come forward to say nothing illegal happened everyone on sm who was convinced it was HE and he is a wrong un is going with the he paid them off angle? because they didn't like the outcome
If it was HE and he is innocent I hope he gets justice for having his life/career ruined
 
Reactions: 22

stardust21

D_Wills said:
The Sun may be scum but they will NOT be happy about being called liars and I think will bring the receipts. Interested to see their front page tomorrow!
Click to expand...
I’m not sure they can. HE a has a right to privacy.

The young person sent them a statement on h the Friday saying it wasn’t true and they printed the story anyway.

Their story was always, “we reported this allegation to the BBC and the person we reported it about is still on TV” - this was a fact. The story was correct.

Doesn’t mean they won’t be liable though… be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
Reactions: 10

rocket1234

So after watching that I’m even more set on the mother being the drug addict and trying to blackmail the bbc on the back of Philip.
HE has children roughly that young persons age and I think that’s where the connection has come from between the children.
im gonna say the mother is jealous of her child who she probably has no relationship with no doubt.
HE has probably been good to the young person through the years with them being friends with his child.
I don’t think a high end lawyer would take on someone knowing they were being paid off. I’d imagine they done their home work. If HE is paying I’d imagine they have evidence that it was an innocent interaction however that may be.
and obviously if the young person has stood by it being lies and probably has evidence against his mother lying then why shouldn’t HE pay for his lawyers. If he’s helped him sonce he was 17 then why stop now? If it’s completely innocent.
 
Reactions: 18
S

Strawberry Tart

Absolutely.so surely he’ll put out a statement saying how awful it’s been and none of this is true.
 
Reactions: 11
M

Meangirl815

I would love to be a fly on the wall in the sun newsroom right now.
I feel like what a time to be alive has been overused since 2020....but what a time to be alive
 
Reactions: 27

FrownieFace

Oh wow so the kid is saying nothing happened, nothing to see here.

What an absolute mess.
 
Reactions: 7

Blonde123

whenever celebs come out to deny something it always reminds me of when katherine jenkins denied having an affair with david beckham. everyone then said no one thought you did katherine
 
Reactions: 25
B

Boring Monday

Or the mum and young person see the events in a completely different way And they are annoyed that she’s taken it this far.

The instagram could just be to stop comments and pictures being lifted.

Lawyers will take cases with a lot of publicity attached for reduced or no fee because the publicity is worth more it May be that they have negotiated a percentage of any income the young person gets from the case which could tip out at more than their fee anyway.
 
Reactions: 13
A

Aandyjbkr

I think the Sun will just end up saying they saw proof of the BBC not investigating properly. Not proof of the accusation.
 
Reactions: 5

WhatABore

Has the son said all of it's lies or just that the age is a lie?
With saying nothing illegal happened.
Is he still saying something happened, just that it wasn't illegal?
 
Reactions: 9

BubbleDuck

Limey said:
Nothing more reliable than the word of a teen crack addict, who has been selling pics of their genitals, and is no doubt under huge pressure from HE's lawyers.
Click to expand...
Has it been confirmed that they were only selling images to HE/“ unnamed presenter” or is it still possible they were selling through OF ? Because if it’s through OF , it’s possible that they don’t want to lose their platform and any other clients- presumably any other clients would be paying similar money if blackmail etc wasn’t involved
 
Reactions: 6

Jwren

Limey said:
Newspaper front pages at 10 will be fun.
Click to expand...
So HE may well be back on at 10
All joking aside it seems like the young male is backtracking, maybe because he could also end up in trouble. The poor mother must be climbing the walls.
 
Reactions: 16
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…