leah.harris
New member
Your welcome x
I can’t stand the “A few vulnerable elderly” argument for ending lockdownslook at other states. WA, Tasmania etc.
Lockdowns clearly DO work. It’s the people doing the wrong thing and “can’t find me if you can’t catch me” which is why NSW is hitting 1200+ cases per day and Victoria in lockdown 7.0.
edit to add I can’t believe OOP thinks so little of our elderly that they think they’re disposable enough to stop lockdowns
Ha! These people really do have high opinions of themselves!She also said in her rant last night that when she was pregnant she couldn't find anyone like her to look up to. That that is what she is trying to achieve with her platform.
Which is almost exactly word for word what Leila used to say back in her Single Mum Diaries days.....
I feel like you are misinformed about the purpose of lockdowns. It isn't just about protecting the vulnerable anymore, they should mostly be vaccinated by now anyway, it's about preventing the total collapse of the healthcare system. Non-covid related illnesses still exist. People aren't getting their knee or hip replacements, mammograms are being cancelled or delayed, cancer surgeries are unable to take place, heart valve replacements are delayed. Lockdowns are to prevent those people from suffering further or dieing before they can receive treatment.Locking everyone up to protect a few vulnerable elderly isn’t a solution if it’s causing more damage to a wider group of people. What we are doing currently doesn’t seem to be working.
Seriously? I have been trying to avoid getting in to the vax/lockdown rhetoric and keep the thread about influencers but what a way to state what a selfish twat you are. Go suck up the arses of Chloe szep and Leila stead with that instead of hereLocking everyone up to protect a few vulnerable elderly isn’t a solution if it’s causing more damage to a wider group of people. What we are doing currently doesn’t seem to be working.
Completely jealous MM escaped. Seriously who wouldn’t want to
look at other states. WA, Tasmania etc.Seriously? I have been trying to avoid getting in to the vax/lockdown rhetoric and keep the thread about influencers but what a way to state what a selfish twat you are. Go suck up the arses of Chloe szep and Leila stead with that instead of here
Imagine telling on yourself like that. That you think "a few vulnerable elderly" are dispensable. Except for it's not just a few vulnerable elderly. It's your neighbour with an auto immune disorder, it's your kid's friend's mum undergoing cancer treatment, it's protecting the health of our healthcare workers, it's ensuring our ICUs aren't so full of covid patients that there is nowhere for a seriously injured car crash victim to go.Locking everyone up to protect a few vulnerable elderly isn’t a solution if it’s causing more damage to a wider group of people. What we are doing currently doesn’t seem to be working.
I work for a female CEO. She donates an incredible amount of time to help mentor and support many people in our industry. However the requests she receives far outweigh the time she has available. Some of the requests are not appropriate. Do you know what she does? A polite email gets sent by her EA declining the offer. Do you know what she doesn't do? Screenshot requests and go on rants about how she doesn't work for freeSo from how I read it SC was approached to give some time in a mentoring or similar capacity to encourage young women in sport or other fields.
She said no because it undervalues her as a female businesswoman lol at that description!
Many people from all areas especially sports give up an enormous amount of time for various causes, but her time is too valuable to donate.
It will be interesting to see (hopefully we’ll be able to ) who has signed up for this campaign that the self important almighty SC refused . She’s just so unlikeable
I know Clary personally, I've seen both the original documents sent to her and the confirmation from the lawyers; the law firm literally said it was not them. Mia forged the whole thing.So reading between the lines...
Mia's saying the Clancy tik tok woman is lying? Either that;
1. The document IS real and drafted and signed (it wil have to be signed.. Mia forge a signature?) and the woman is lying and never reached out for confirmation, just saying the law firm didn't send it wothout checking ;
2. No such letter was ever sent and the Clancy woman has forged and made up the letter we see..
But none of these make sense.. no motive ..
No one is requesting their medical histories whatsoever. Their views on vaccination and in particular the COVID vaccine are important to a lot of followers. Of course they don't HAVE to share their views, but it is a very topical issue for a myriad of reasons. I personally would not want to follow or add to the monetary gain of those who are publicly denouncing sensible health directions like the use of safe vaccines during a pandemic.In their defence do they really need to discuss their stance on it either way? Since when was it a right to know random people’s medical history? It all just seems so crazy to me, suddenly random strangers asking your medical history.