Out of curiosity (as I'm also a person who asks far too many questions of people who would far rather have their overconfidence interpreted as expertise...it's not. However much they insist that they know x when the truth is y), if any of you had applied for a bog standard, basement dwelling minion position in a huge organisation for an easier life - what is the likelihood of your interview panel consisting of three major league directors in areas you also admittedly have considerable related experience in but aren't required to for the role advertised?
I can't quite see why they would be troubling themselves with such an insignificant little role/person when it won't affect their roles or functions one bit. Especially as the gap between application and interview has been over two months when the usual turnaround is about a fortnight.
(Yes, I'm deeply suspicious here.)