But it’s been a while since we last saw his full body, so it might be him. If it isn’t him, who else? Another Lebanese “sugar daddy”?This man doesn't seem Joe. Joe is slimmer
This man doesn't seem Joe. Joe is slimmer
I thought Loro Piana is a quiet luxury? I kinda expecting that hookers will go for Chanel or LV
Some wear Chanel and LV, some YSL and Valentino, and others Loro Piana and Bruno Cucinelli. There's no one-size fits all look for hookers - some you can spot a mile off, but many, you would have no idea they are escorts as their clothing and accessories are not branded or emblazoned with logos, nor are they dressed in a way you imagine a hooker would dress.I thought Loro Piana is a quiet luxury? I kinda expecting that hookers will go for Chanel or LV
I think that the original intention that Banana had was to NEVER reveal her husband's identity (prolly because he didn't want that). However, this went pear shaped because Tattle found out who Joe is and now he doesn't want to have anything to do with her publicly....so the result is that even something as innocuous having lunch with his wife is now considered a no no. Meaning; they both probably thought that as long as his identity stays concealed, she is OK to mention him here and there and show his wrist occasionally. They probably thought they could do that forever. But then his identity got revealed and all the bad publicity might have impacted his career....so now Banana if 'forbidden' to show himIf it was her husband Joe, surely a post about going to a restaurant with his wife wouldn't be too badly impacting his career?
We revealed his identity but she's the one who was draping herself all over Bassam for the world to see and posting about her "lovely night with him." If she hadn't done that, maybe Joe could appear in a photo or two with her nowI think that the original intention that Banana had was to NEVER reveal her husband's identity (prolly because he didn't want that). However, this went pear shaped because Tattle found out who Joe is and now he doesn't want to have anything to do with her publicly....so the result is that even something as innocuous having lunch with his wife is now considered a no no. Meaning; they both probably thought that as long as his identity stays concealed, she is OK to mention him here and there and show his wrist occasionally. They probably thought they could do that forever. But then his identity got revealed and all the bad publicity might have impacted his career....so now Banana if 'forbidden' to show him
Yes, Banana made a complete fool of Joe back then by climbing on Bassam like a stalk of ivy, that's for sure. I don't blame him that he doesn't want to be associated with her.We revealed his identity but she's the one who was draping herself all over Bassam for the world to see and posting about her "lovely night with him." If she hadn't done that, maybe Joe could appear in a photo or two with her now
She's been mentioning (but not showing!) Joe more in the past week or so - clearly as a response to Tattle's neverending questions. But I wonder; could they be divorcing? What if they're already divorced? Is there a way to verify that? Some public register or something? She says '... blah blah blah my husband this and my husband that, blah blah blah'...but we haven't seen him for ages! What if Joe finds someone he REALLY wants to be with? Wouldn't Banana be cast aside then? How long does she think she can play this charade? Even the most blind of her followers must know by now that something is seriously off with that marriage. Is Aija really so naive to think that she can sustain this nonsense long term? The promised large celebration in Joe's native country is clearly off for good. And now the liar says the she never wanted a large wedding anyway?! Yeah, right, you lying b.i.t.c.h.! I hate how she thinks she can lead everyone on! We see through your crap, Aija!Good morning Tattle! Anna spent a verylonelyeleghuntproductive Easter Monday answering our questions and more damage control!
here's a sum up:
View attachment 2092104
she actually wore the Hermès boots
View attachment 2092105
The so promised 'big celebration after pandemic ' is not going to happen (I bet Joe isn't going to spend a penny on that anyway)
View attachment 2092107
Are you sure dear Eleghunt Mangoe?
View attachment 2092113
I'm sure no man as such bad tastes Anna, we know you can't style yourself and Joe just says yes so he doesn't hear your voice anymore.
View attachment 2092118
Banana needs you to give her matter for her pohdcast
View attachment 2092121
We thought you invented it Anna Bey?
And finally, the Arc de Triomphe of worst looks and scary face from our favourite elegant stylist:
View attachment 2092122
View attachment 2092124
View attachment 2092125
Throw that coat away!
Thank you for the screenshots @Pardon my French!Good morning Tattle! Anna spent a verylonelyeleghuntproductive Easter Monday answering our questions and more damage control!
here's a sum up:
View attachment 2092104
she actually wore the Hermès boots
View attachment 2092105
The so promised 'big celebration after pandemic ' is not going to happen (I bet Joe isn't going to spend a penny on that anyway)
View attachment 2092107
Are you sure dear Eleghunt Mangoe?
View attachment 2092113
I'm sure no man as such bad tastes Anna, we know you can't style yourself and Joe just says yes so he doesn't hear your voice anymore.
View attachment 2092118
Banana needs you to give her matter for her pohdcast
View attachment 2092121
We thought you invented it Anna Bey?
And finally, the Arc de Triomphe of worst looks and scary face from our favourite elegant stylist:
View attachment 2092122
View attachment 2092124
View attachment 2092125
Throw that coat away!
It is, indeed. However, it’s also a smart move for Joe not to have a religious wedding because that leaves his door open for “remarrying properly”. Apart from that, civil divorce procedures won’t affect the eligibility for a Catholic wedding. Boris Johnson used that to have a Catholic wedding, if memory serves me right.Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a marriage to a Catholic outside of the church non-sacramental?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?