I think the reason Alice irks most people on this thread is the lack of authenticity. For 3 years or however long the Gramps thing lasted it was showing a picture-perfect, 5 star life. Then the breakup came and she said it had been horrible and she had been bullied. Then the reconciliation happened and it was immediately picture-perfect, 5 star again. The earlier posts hinting at less than perfect life were erased. Then the Gramps thing really ended and she painted a picture of an abusive relationship, where the police had to be involved. Very different from the life she had been promoting.
Then the Dirty Dan bomb landed and it moved from tattoo after one week crazy, to moving in after a few weeks, triple crazy. Then the inevitable breakup happened and there was not really any explanation. Alice is correct that she can choose what she shares, but if you only show the good bits and the bad bits seep out, so we see the life you were presenting is bollocks, then people will call you on it and realise you are not authentic.
Although this seems like a horrible situation and it is, if Alice is smart, I think she can turn this into a positive. I still do not believe she would have handed money over to Daniel Salmassian, alleged conman. Whether she has or not, I am sure she can write a piece for one of the nationals about her relationship with him and the stories of the other women. I am sure she could get on a few daytime TV shows talking about the warning signs, how to do an online search on new love interests etc.
She could even ditch Slay, which looks to be dead and launch Slay the online dating security consultancy, running courses on how to research your new man. It could become a proper feminist crusade. she could become the Greta Thunberg of online dating.
If she owns her lack of authenticity and the crazy last few months, I think most of the critics will disappear and she will probably add a lot more followers, so she can generate ad after ad.
After all the rent ain't going to pay itself, don't you know.