Her chin looks huge in the bronzer video.
She is very pretty without the filters. The candid double chin shot is unfortunate, but we all have unflattering photos/angles. She's 47. Why does she have to use the bolied egg filter? On Trinny's haircutting video a couple of years ago, she looks great without the filters.The industry people must laugh at her as they know how she looks in real life
It just has to be "the elephant in the room" when the likes of Caroline Hirons, Lisa Eldridge, Estee Lalonde, Sam Chapman etc see her at various events. It's because of how she looks in person compared to her own IG pics being so astonishingly different that raises eyebrows constantly. I am constantly amazed at how she thinks she can get away with the deception and convince us all it's down to other silly reasons other than blatantly using face editing software.The industry people must laugh at her as they know how she looks in real life
I thought she looked good in the Trinny video. Alex has an attractive face and very pretty eyes. Great eyebrows but she seems to need us all to believe she looks 30 years old with a skinny, gaunt face and zero fine lines. Alex is attractive but I feel like she's desperate to pass herself off as waaay hotter than she actually is in real life. When I first saw her in person in West London, I really wasShe is very pretty without the filters. The candid double chin shot is unfortunate, but we all have unflattering photos/angles. She's 47. Why does she have to use the bolied egg filter? On Trinny's haircutting video a couple of years ago, she looks great without the filters.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who has noticed how unnecessarily snarky Alex can be when challenged. I can understand getting tough on outrageously rude trolls but I've seen people leave what I considered to be quite reasonably civil and polite questions about her use of filters or whether her product endorsements are trustworthy and those questions or remarks always appear to be deleted a short while later after she's replied quite aggressively to the commenter. I don't think she can handle any criticism whatsoever even when it's wholly deserved. The fact she refuses to admit she uses beauty filters whilst asserting she's a high integrity beauty journalist is what turned me from being rather fond of her 10 years ago when she worked for Glamour to losing all respect for her. I am just appalled by her wilful dishonesty. I hope we follow Norway's suit and pass laws that require content creators to declare their use of beauty filters but she'd probably just continue to lie and deny anyway. As you said, she thinks her followers won't know any better and I just think she's constantly insulting our intelligence. Mind you, so many women leave "your skin is goals!" or "OMG your skin!" comments on her IG that I realise, depressingly few people can detect the use of beauty filters anymore.Her utter arrogance in insisting she doesn't filter is such a turn off for her followers, especially because her bread and butter is make up and beauty products. if she was pimping furniture to the masses, I doubt anyone would notice her weird cheek sucking in thing. She must think we're all idiots to buy this tit she's giving off daily.
She's a fraud, and haughtily aggressive when challenged (from my experience). Don't ask her about declaring gifts/ads etc. She'll take your face off.
That made me laughShe is very pretty without the filters. The candid double chin shot is unfortunate, but we all have unflattering photos/angles. She's 47. Why does she have to use the bolied egg filter? On Trinny's haircutting video a couple of years ago, she looks great without the filters.
Using such extreme filters is not only dishonest and desperate but makes her perfectly lovely face look unnecessarily big and bloated, in comparison. Doing herself no favours in any way.And it continues. The daily deceit will never stop <sigh>
And the way she looks at herself oh-so dreamily in the camera when it’s all just a product of Facetuning, smoothing filters and extremely bright lighting.View attachment 1491932View attachment 1491933
Excellent point. She has shot herself in the foot. Genuinely, I think Alex has always had an attractive face with pretty brows and eyes BUT because I've seen her face so heavily digitally altered and perfected so many times to look significantly younger, skinnier and kinda feline, delicate and doe-eyed, when you do find true-to-life images of her in tagged photos and YouTube videos, you do find yourself thinking, oh,Using such extreme filters is not only dishonest and desperate but makes her perfectly lovely face look unnecessarily big and bloated, in comparison. Doing herself no favours in any way.
Alex documenting her weight loss journey in either Cosmo or Glamour magazine was how I first discovered her more than 10 years ago - around 12 years, I think and I recall thinking she had a very pretty face and I was impressed with her 'before and after' photo because she dropped over 2 stone in weight, I think and she looked great showing off her post-weight loss body. She was very attractive but with age, as she entered her 40s (still no idea how old she is exactly because she never seems to mention her age the way Samantha Chapman and Caroline Hirons mention their ages openly) she has grown more matronly and stopped wearing dresses and skirts and started wearing oversized masculine suits, and oversized cardigans - her clothes definitely got way more frumpy - and then the weird FaceTuning and filtering begun and I wonder if she was trying to over-compensate for her weight gain.I remember years ago when Alex was the beauty director of Cosmopolitan and was interviewed on tv, she was around a size 18 with a stunning face. She moved to Glamour and did a monthly column where she lost weight.
She's 47. In the Daily Mail article I linked above from 2010 she said she was 35.Shes closwr to 50 than 40 I think. Its like she wants to show people shes 26. Her filters are too much
I don’t know why, but I’ve never taken to Jo Elvin. I get the impression that she’s ruthless/ success at any costShe's 47. In the Daily Mail article I linked above from 2010 she said she was 35.
On a podcast a couple of years ago she said that when she moved to Glamour magazine, Jo Elvin, the editor, asked her to do the weight loss series. She wasn't happy about it and felt very self conscious, but lost over 3 stone.
I know people who have worked with her who said she is awful.I don’t know why, but I’ve never taken to Jo Elvin. I get the impression that she’s ruthless/ success at any cost