victimfocus : Most liked Posts

10% said:

Am I right that they only got this because the claims were so strong? Then they were never tested to see if there was any truth to their claims that Sally Anne was stalking and harassing. Any evidence of 5 police warnings?

View attachment 3953612

Click to expand...

Hi, I’ve been made aware of this and just want to keep my name clear

Jess (& Jaimi even though I only ever responded to a message she sent me first ) pushed WYP to apply for an SPO against me. I was advised at the initial stage WYP can apply without providing evidence, just from the ‘victims’ statements and to be fair my twitter use was a lot because of how they’d affected my mental health, This was fine - my solicitor advised we will contest the application in court, I appeared in court to literally state my name, whilst my solicitor contested the SPO application and stated we would need a full day in court for me to present my evidence to contest allegations against me and for an SPO. The court accepted this and scheduled a full day in court for 6 months time, this was to give both legal teams time to complete a legal bundle of evidence and swap evidence before the new court date.
I was advised and agreed that in the mean time I should accept an INTERIM SPO, which is standard in these cases. It was a very easy, limited SPO - had to say I wouldn’t make any contact with Jess/Jaimi, give police names of all my social media platforms and not post online and meet with an officer a couple of times to ‘check in’
It was all agreed that actually all this would work in my favour as it would prove I’m not doing what I’m being accused of and that I’m ‘complying’.
nothing really changed - my solicitor gathered evidence, the police officer had to check in with was LOVELY. It actually gave me some well needed breathing space.
WYP were given dates by the court to provide their evidence to each allegation made on the Original SPO application - they failed to meet two deadlines so my solicitor took them back to court, in which they cancelled the application for an SPO. They provided no evidence at all to back up Jess/Jaimi claims.
Ironically when they must have received this news, they both went on an online rampage about me, and ended up jeopardising their whole case even more. I have since had a formal apology from the police.
i did at the time agree to sign an undertaking by the police to say I’d never contact Jess/jaimi, again this worked highly in my favour as I wasn’t contacting them anyway, and proved I wasn’t what they were saying I was.
Nothing has affected me at all the undertaking expired a while back with no issues at all.
I have nothing at all against me.

to put it bluntly, Jess lied to the police to get me silenced. There were many lies we could easily prove, including this scorcher, that I actually showed to the police and their face dropped.
she told them she cancelled an event as she was ‘too scared to go’ … look who’s photod at the event

Karlywert said:

I can’t read the full story and don’t use PayPal but this is the case jess seemingly has spoken about, Chris Ingham, how he had death threats, rape threats etc made from tattle aimed at him and Sarah. It seems it was reported to police by social services not any influencer, and it was malicious communications not forum posts on tattle. Yet she told the feds it was 10000% tattle forum?
Chris was all over her posts reposting them at the time.
I can’t see what’s in the report but I can read it’s not been done on tattle by a gang of stalkers, just one guy who has a YouTube channel.


View attachment 4039896

Click to expand...

Tattle isn't mentioned, rape and death threats against children aren't mentioned and rape threats against adults aren't mentioned either, so she's either made all that up or repeated the lies of someone else without doing any checking.

Nothing like this has ever been posted on Tattle, they'd be banned in seconds. Their posts wouldn't have ever made it live. There's nothing to suggest the man has ever posted on tattle.

Influencers linking this to tattle show who they really are. This is stalking, this is abuse and it's from a mentally vulnerable individual. A sad situation for all involved.

Only a horrific individual would use this for their own nefarious means, such as selling a book or trying to shut down a site that has documented her behaviour. I don't understand the mindset of someone that would invent all this stuff such as death threats against children and rape. She needs help.

If she lies so brazenly about things that can easily be debunked from public records, I imagine these lies are the thin end of the wedge.

And publishers print this without checking?!

---

This is what Jessica Taylor has in her book that's been published by Hachette:

Again, in April 2026, in an unrelated case in the UK, a second Tattle Life user pleaded guilty to stalking offences which included graphic death threats and rape threats both towards the adult victims and their children. At the time of going to press, the sentencing hearing was expected to be scheduled for June 2026.

---

This is the court reporting:

*, 24, sent emails threatening to kill influencers Anna Saccone-Joly, her husband Jonathan Joly, and Chris Ingham, known for their ‘vlogger family’ content which attracted millions of subscribers.

* made malicious referrals to social services leading to an investigation and doxxed the Jolys’ address on social media, Snaresbrook Crown Court heard.

Prosecutor Andrew Dowden said emails sent to Mrs Saccone-Joly included threats to ‘slit her throat and burn down the house, to sleep smash the boiler to induce carbon monoxide poisoning, [and] criticising her parenting.’

* ‘posted the [Joly] family’s postcode online, made 70 referrals to social services,’ and used ‘various racial, transphobic, and Islamophobic slurs which would not be acceptable by broader society.

‘The defendant also sent various emails and other social media contact in respect of Mr Ingham in May 2025, saying that he should “dig his own grave, that is not a threat, it is a promise.”’

Mr Dowden said the Ingham family has since ‘moved to Dubai full time’, which resulted in financial losses after companies ‘pulled out of deals’ with the channel.

Alex Rynn, defending said: ‘He is socially isolated, he lives his life online, using the wrong way to raise issues about the presentation and use of people’s children on the internet for vlogging.

‘Mr Guilfoyle knows he should not have done it and he is very sorry he had done it.’

Passing sentence Judge Paul Donegan said: ‘You sent an email to Mrs Joly’s email account threatening to slit her throat, burn her house down with them in it.

‘You sent references to knowing where the Jolys lived and where their children attended school.’

The judge said the stalking escalated while he was on police bail and the repeated referrals to social services he had made ultimately led to an investigation against the Joly family.

Judge Donegan added: ‘In an earlier period you committed a like offence of stalking causing serious harm to Chris Ingham, those messages include threats to kill them, including saying you will have them killed.

‘You said you were aware of their movements and emails also include references to their address, which include the road on which they live.’

He said Guilfoyle’s stalking against both families was a ‘persistent action and designed to maximise distress,’ adding: ‘I am sure very serious harm has been caused to them as a result of your actions.’

But he said he had read reports compiled by psychiatrists who describe Guilfoyle as a ‘mentally vulnerable defendant’ with severe autism.

He sentenced * to a suspended term of 18 months and ordered 30 days of rehabilitation activities and 150 hours of unpaid community work.

The judge also imposed a restraining order lasting three years, under which * is banned from contacting or ‘subscribing, commenting, or interacting’ with content posted by the Jolys or Inghams.

* was also ordered to pay costs of £500 and a victim surcharge of £114.

The Sun previously revealed how Ingham, who runs the Ingham Family channel with his wife Sarah and boasts over a million subscribers, sent teenage fans inappropriate messages.

In one text, the dad-of-three was seen asking a 16-year-old fan to ‘sneak out’ of her mum’s hotel and meet him in the middle of the night.

Ingham, 42, denied being a ‘sexual predator’ and police at the time confirmed that while contacts of a ‘sexual nature’ were made, no offence had been committed as the girl was aged 16 or over.

Earlier the court was told Ingham, despite claiming to have moved to Dubai for fear of their safety, had recently posted videos saying: ‘Anyone who stays in the UK to pay tax here is dumb.’

Mr Rynn said: ‘He says by his own admission how great life is in Dubai.’

Let-off for stalker who threatened to kill YouTuber family – Court News UK

I think this is a perfect quote for her next thread title.

A triumph of shallow knowledge and ambition over ability.

After I read it last night I was thinking how can we get as many people to read this as possible. Wake up this morning to see it pinned at the top of the page

A few have asked for these to be re-posted:



Any thoughts would be welcome in this thread.

If you've never read this thread before, you can quickly get up to speed by clicking the "most liked posts" button on each thread.

Yel said:

Tattle isn't mentioned, threats against children aren't mentioned and rape threats aren't mentioned either, so she's almost certainly made all that up.

Nothing like this has ever been posted on Tattle, they'd be banned in seconds. Their posts wouldn't have ever made it live.

Influencers linking this to tattle show who they really are. This is stalking, this is abuse and it's from a mentally vulnerable individual. A sad situation for all involved.

Only a horrific individual would use this for their own nefarious means, such as selling a book or trying to shut down a site that has documented her behaviour. I don't understand the mindset of someone that would invent all this stuff such as death threats against children and rape. She needs help.

If she lies so brazenly about things that can easily be debunked from public records, I imagine these lies are the thin end of the wedge.

And publishers put this out without any checking?!

---

*, 24, sent emails threatening to kill influencers Anna Saccone-Joly, her husband Jonathan Joly, and Chris Ingham, known for their ‘vlogger family’ content which attracted millions of subscribers.

* made malicious referrals to social services leading to an investigation and doxxed the Jolys’ address on social media, Snaresbrook Crown Court heard.

Prosecutor Andrew Dowden said emails sent to Mrs Saccone-Joly included threats to ‘slit her throat and burn down the house, to sleep smash the boiler to induce carbon monoxide poisoning, [and] criticising her parenting.’

* ‘posted the [Joly] family’s postcode online, made 70 referrals to social services,’ and used ‘various racial, transphobic, and Islamophobic slurs which would not be acceptable by broader society.

‘The defendant also sent various emails and other social media contact in respect of Mr Ingham in May 2025, saying that he should “dig his own grave, that is not a threat, it is a promise.”’

Mr Dowden said the Ingham family has since ‘moved to Dubai full time’, which resulted in financial losses after companies ‘pulled out of deals’ with the channel.

Alex Rynn, defending said: ‘He is socially isolated, he lives his life online, using the wrong way to raise issues about the presentation and use of people’s children on the internet for vlogging.

‘Mr Guilfoyle knows he should not have done it and he is very sorry he had done it.’

Passing sentence Judge Paul Donegan said: ‘You sent an email to Mrs Joly’s email account threatening to slit her throat, burn her house down with them in it.

‘You sent references to knowing where the Jolys lived and where their children attended school.’

The judge said the stalking escalated while he was on police bail and the repeated referrals to social services he had made ultimately led to an investigation against the Joly family.

Judge Donegan added: ‘In an earlier period you committed a like offence of stalking causing serious harm to Chris Ingham, those messages include threats to kill them, including saying you will have them killed.

‘You said you were aware of their movements and emails also include references to their address, which include the road on which they live.’

He said Guilfoyle’s stalking against both families was a ‘persistent action and designed to maximise distress,’ adding: ‘I am sure very serious harm has been caused to them as a result of your actions.’

But he said he had read reports compiled by psychiatrists who describe Guilfoyle as a ‘mentally vulnerable defendant’ with severe autism.

He sentenced * to a suspended term of 18 months and ordered 30 days of rehabilitation activities and 150 hours of unpaid community work.

The judge also imposed a restraining order lasting three years, under which * is banned from contacting or ‘subscribing, commenting, or interacting’ with content posted by the Jolys or Inghams.

* was also ordered to pay costs of £500 and a victim surcharge of £114.

The Sun previously revealed how Ingham, who runs the Ingham Family channel with his wife Sarah and boasts over a million subscribers, sent teenage fans inappropriate messages.

In one text, the dad-of-three was seen asking a 16-year-old fan to ‘sneak out’ of her mum’s hotel and meet him in the middle of the night.

Ingham, 42, denied being a ‘sexual predator’ and police at the time confirmed that while contacts of a ‘sexual nature’ were made, no offence had been committed as the girl was aged 16 or over.

Earlier the court was told Ingham, despite claiming to have moved to Dubai for fear of their safety, had recently posted videos saying: ‘Anyone who stays in the UK to pay tax here is dumb.’

Mr Rynn said: ‘He says by his own admission how great life is in Dubai.’

---

This is what Jessica Taylor has in her book that's been published by Hachette:

Again, in April 2026, in an unrelated case in the UK, a second Tattle Life user pleaded guilty to stalking offences which included graphic death threats and rape threats both towards the adult victims and their children. At the time of going to press, the sentencing hearing was expected to be scheduled for June 2026.

Click to expand...

I love that Chris Ingham tried to get the prosecution to argue he lost brand deals cos he'd to move to Dubai cos of his stalker.

Then the press goes and reiterated actually he lost deals cos he has a sexually interest In children and moved to Dubai to avoid paying his tax bill love that for him

It surprises me any 1 star reviews remain online as I remember with her recent publications any negative reviews were reported and removed.

That book wasn’t her first foray into the world of self publishing. She self published this book back in 2011 when she was only 20 under her married name.

This is my favourite review of one of her books as someone seemingly didn’t realise it would show who the Goodreads account holder was

Feeling very sensitive today, please see this 🩷

This comment sounds legit: https://kerrydaynes.substack.com/p/click-lie-repeat-inside-the-claims/comment/264722550

I'm a previous employee.

During my short time at victim focus I raised several concerns:

I gently challenged her about the way her and her partner spoke about Sally Ann and laughed about harming her. I questioned the language she was using to describe Sally Ann- misogynistic and cruel.

I raised a gentle concern in conversation about her personal social media content and how it would reflect poorly on her company Victim Focus.

I was concerned about her "professional" move away from trauma-informed work to the world of "anti-medicine". She was giving staff and followers overly confident- and in my view dangerous and unqualified advice that "medication" (she is vague) is bad. Of course there are valid concerns around misdiagnosis, medical misogyny and over prescribing- but her advice was broad, clumsy and beyond her professional qualifications. The result? Her followers- and some staff- some very vulnerable- coming off their medication in a sudden and unmanaged way. It is my personal belief that we will never know how many women will have slipped into a mental health crisis by following her advice. We will never know the harm they will have experienced and the far reaching impacts of her snake oil advice.

As a result of raising concerns I was sacked, underpaid and reported to the police for stalking. There was no evidence and no action taken against me.

This was incredibly distressing and silencing. I am a victim-survivor of domestic abuse, sexual abuse and stalking by an ex partner. I would hazard a guess that because of the nature of her projects- that the majority of her staff and followers are- So to find myself victim of a vexatious and entirely fabricated claim that I was stalking and harassing her was incredibly distressing and triggering. In this regard, her pattern of accusing victim-survivors of being perpetrators feels intentional.

When working for Victim Focus I had access to her personal and professional social media accounts. My experiences of the messages she received do not align with her narrative of harassment.

During my time at Victim Focus I saw no targeted abuse via direct messages or on in her comments sections. I saw unpleasant comments on social media threads- but nothing crossing that line. I of course understand, especially as a woman, Taylor is subject to online misogyny. This is unacceptable and a damaging aspect of the online world. However, I saw no evidence of targeted abuse or credible threats. Accuracy matters.

She encourages staff and followers to disclose abuse (whether this is domestic, sexual or childhood abuse). In my view, she uses this to accelerate and foster trust and a sense of bonding with individual women. She then exploits this- either over working and underpaying staff, or encouraging followers to repeat her fictional claims about group stalking. The impact of this manipulation on her victims and those being targetted should not be underestimated.

Worryingly, the police have been poor in understanding the wider pattern- Taylor using vexatious complaints of stalking to silence whistleblowers. She has been awarded lucrative training contracts by (two?) police forces. I therefore suspect that an investigation into her would reflect badly on the police and those who commissioned her. This is speculation- but at the very least her work for various police forces has the optics of lending credibility to her claims of being stalked.

Thank you for writing this blog. Do not underestimate the depth, extent and consequences of her abusive behaviour -specifically her ill-informed guidance/ content around suicide and encouraging medicated people to stop taking their treatments.

It sends my body cold simply thinking about this.

I hope Sally Ann is reading this. When I started working at Victim Focus I initially believed what my employer, Taylor told me- that Sally Ann was an obsessive and didn't feature in her book. When it soon became apparent that this was not the case, I challenged Taylor.

I have subsequently apologised directly to Sally Ann and told her she has my unwavering support. I have huge admiration for her patience and strength. If she is reading this I would like her to know that she is hugely admired by so many- not just for how she has dealt with being victimised by Taylor- but for the compassionate and resilient woman that she is.

Thank you again for writing this.

I am aware of recent media coverage relating to Jessica Taylor and allegations that have been made about me over the past several years.

All have said they have looked on this site before writing/presenting.

The public has largely heard one perspective on these events. I believe there is important context and an alternative perspective that has not been explored.

I am a survivor of childhood sexual exploitation and have been significantly affected by the events that followed these allegations. I dispute aspects of the public narrative surrounding this matter and believe the situation is more complex than has been presented.

Any journalist, researcher, broadcaster, or media organisation interested in hearing an alternative perspective is welcome to contact me directly.

I am willing to speak openly, provide documentation where appropriate, and discuss the impact these events have had on my life.

Please contact me via private message or email.

[email protected]

Once again thank you for the outpour of love & understanding from those who see what this really is.

10% said:

This comment sounds legit: https://kerrydaynes.substack.com/p/click-lie-repeat-inside-the-claims/comment/264722550

Click to expand...

It is.

I'm also an ex employee. I recognise the poster as my ex colleague from the details, and I can confirm every word of that comment is legit.

I was very fortunate, The court, police & solicitor all treated me very well.
I only had to say my name in court and the 3 magistrates that where there let me leave early as realised it was stressful then smiled and thanked me. They then spoke to my parents and support worker who were also there and thanked them for coming to support me. My parents replied ‘we wouldn’t be anywhere else.’
We often joke how it’s very strange for parents to be ‘proud’ of their daughter going to court

I had the best support and from people who didn’t even know me but had seen stuff online who wrote statements about how they saw for themselves how J&J treating me. I feel extremely overwhelmed with love and support and I still can’t believe now how much people helped me.

I also had a well known TV channel write a statement in support of me due to an accusation that I’d lost Jess a job with them.

ironically we were all actually abit gutted we didn’t have that full day in court to present everything evidence wise, as so much would have come out.
In terms of the crime stuff, I was never arrested, agreed to all interviews. I was very open and honest. My solicitor told me she is often working to avoid court for clients - but actually mine would have been a case that would have worked really well in my favour for court as lots of things Jess/J lied about and did to me would be laid out. But it’s all still there and waiting for when the time is right.

i was drained to be honest so glad deep down that wasn’t the case. I’d already been healed so much by the pours of love and support - that genuinely shocked me and made me realise the good in so many people and proffesionals again.

People with main character syndrome are inevitably the most boring fuckers out there, aren't they.

Came across this thread from elsewhere and decided to join the site.

I used to work at VF. Jess is totally a grandiose narcissist, who purposely employs women on benefits in order to extract unpaid labour out of them. I left the org and moved into a different field of work entirely in order to get away from her. Blocked her everywhere. She still has flying monkeys keep an eye on my social media. She's a bad human being.

The first review, not from a friend, has popped up. Someone who has been reviewing books for years and got an advanced copy



Bizarre bizarre premise for a book. As an academic in the field of VAWG (violence against women and girls) I understand the need for rigorous, empirically grounded literature to strengthen our hand against our oppressors. We need testimonials of victims, and carefully and ethically gathered data on the materiality and harms of stalking and harassment. We need clear cut methodologies so research can be viewed for quality and source. What this book is, is nothing like this: it’s a call to arms of Jess and her wife “Jay” to ensure that both of them can continue to self-publish false reports, tweet and make tiktoks, run a multi-level marketing campaign, and self-publicise all without any kickback, criticism, or questioning. Jess seems to mistake gossip and online forums (somewhat irritating, but not dangerous, violent or illegal) with stalking (dangerous, violent and illegal) and, honestly, wants to close down free speech because it affects her business model. For someone who claims to side against patriarchy, she seems to hate women talking and sharing information. Might I suggest Jess turns her computer off once in a while? That way she would stop deliberately and with bad faith conflating idle banter with something much more ominous.

Whining, subjectivity, and tiktok do not make compelling evidence. Unfortunate, as with NO peer-reviewed articles or books under her belt, it’s all JT seems to have.



I've kept a close eye on Victim Focus over the years and have seen it's staff numbers shrink from 15 to 2 (Jess and her wife). Jess ought to turn the interrogation onto herself to see why her business is failing, and not blame people online who are doing the right thing by calling her out for the hack, scammer, and charlatan that she is.

So much love for the piece, not least the thorough, professional care (you don’t know them, Jess) shown at the very end

Kerry, know, if we could, your substack likes would be rising higher, were it possible, than the dodgy doc’s self regard

In my job I'm basically a professional bullshit detector. I have to balance evidence and reach a decision on what has most likely happened in a situation and why. And there are certain kinds of people I talk to every day. Some will tell you their story, and talk about the series of events impacted them, and how they feel about it. And it's often very upsetting stuff. And then you look at the evidence, and it's often so much worse than they've told you.

And then there's another kind of person who sets off the alarm in my brain, and they will tell a similar story, but rather than the story being offered as information, it's more like, "this extraordinary thing happened to me, and therefore I am uniquely correct/persecuted/special/clever/insightful". And then you look at the evidence, and the story is rarely the one they have told, and sometimes it's actually the opposite, in that they are either not being entirely truthful, or they are the author of their own misfortune.

Look at every single story Jess tells, about herself or others. They're never presented as information. She doesn't share a single narrative, no matter how dramatic or mundane, where she isn't the victim, the hero, the survivor, the expert, the truth-teller, the authority, the only person who sees what's really going on.

I'm a feminist, and think that extending empathy and the benefit of the doubt to people is generally a good thing, so when women tell stories about their lives, I usually believe them.

But once you see this strategy of sharing an ostensibly traumatic story as a self-aggrandising tool, you can't unsee it. There has never been a single second where she talks about a scenario with any nuance. It is always a hot take or high drama event that proves that she is uniquely special in some way. And it's used specifically as a way to create false intimacy with her often quite vulnerable audience who are navigating their own trauma and desperately looking for answers and community. It's manipulative disclosure, sort of "because I told you this, you now owe me trust/exemption from scrutiny, and also, look how special I am!"

Really makes you think.

Do they really think that because they post every detail of their family life, home, location etc that they somehow “deserve” ours?

Do they really think that because people (not just tattlers) report them for sharing information about themselves publicly like recording/talking on their phone whilst driving, or neglecting their children’s needs, or undeclared ads, which can affect their income (because it’s wrong, not because it was Reported) which affects their earnings, they can go to our employers and get us sacked?

I don’t know the reasons why SB wasn’t named on the company records, but isn’t it a total case in point as to why he wouldn’t want to be? They didn’t uncover his identity then pursue him through the proper channels (I.e. serve him to appear in court) they went after his family, elderly parents, child relatives, some woman in North London, deprived him of access to funds for months and years, doxxing Yel, making internet threats against his website users (tattlers) doxxing them, inboxing people legal threats, offering “immunity” then doxxing, slating SB and his business all over mainstream media reducing the business income…he hasn‘t even broken a law.

Hey influencers - YOUR sort of behaviour is why WE don't publicise who we are. Really, who are the trolls In this scenario?

goldenrodshortbread said:

Re. thirst traps. I think the point is just that a professional person would not generally have topless photos of themselves, or private photos of them groping their wife on their work socials. It's just not necessary. PTWM is notorious for this - again someone purporting to work in the VAWG sector whilst posting sexualised images of herself. It's not pornographic, but it's not professional.

View attachment 4040061
View attachment 4040062

Click to expand...

If I wanted to see a chubby lass with her tits out I'd look in the mirror.

Hannahebee said:

I take it that from this post by @BanditHealer on Sunday you weren't able to find any proof of anyone on here ever posting Jess's address @Yel.

Click to expand...

I've checked all the deleted posts and her address or house has never been posted. Other than something like a repost of the bathroom skylight she posted on socials.

I've used keywords to check all the live posts and can't find anything either, although this could have been missed.

She started saying in 2022 around the time the threads started that her address had been posted on a forum without naming tattle and posters said then it had never been posted.

They all claim their address was posted but if this ever happened mods are the first ones to want to know about it and delete it! Why on earth would we let that stuff be posted and give them ammo?! It makes no sense. If anyone can find a live post where this happened all it means is no one has ever taken seconds to report it. Rarely Rightmove details have been posted because the influencer has made their new house content and purely out of being nosey. Of course that's deleted as it's usually reported very quickly.

Influencers make up horrific lies because the truth that tattle is mild gossip wouldn't win over the public and no one has time to read thousands of posts that show they're lying.

Of course this was all rewritten and exaggerated by Jess & Jaimi to suit their narratives, same old story
difference is I come with receipts