LooseLipsSinkShipz
Active member
Hehe
Attachments
-
40.2 KB
I had a beautiful and perfect baby girl we named Elise, she was born alive but died shortly after. We went from total elation to heartbroken devastation - our dream turned nightmare so fastYes the baby had Trisomy 18 so would have not survived an hour after birth. There was a heart defect also aside from all the issues that babes with T18 have .
Any baby born > 20weeks or over 420gm ( roughly) is a registered birth therefore parents have the same opportunity to spend time with babes no matter how or why the pregnancy has ended , if they choose to of course .
---
Sending you lots of love . If you don’t mind did you have a little girl or boy - don’t answer if you don’t want to.
I completely agree that it’s strange behaviour. I gave birth to my first baby a month ago today, she died shortly after. A day later I made one story post telling people on Instagram that she had been born but had not stayed with us and could people please not contact me about it as it hurts too much right now. I only did that because I was getting lots of msgs asking if I had the baby yet. Any responses I got from that post where I had asked people not to send condolences, just made me cry harder. Reposting what people have sent you is certainly for attention. Why on earth would you want to keep being re-traumatised? I feel for her because I know how it feels, but she’s definitely got some prior issues I feel.people seeing through her bullshit
Hey. Right. I'm back. (I'm an R.N and I've been working night shifts.. ). And I literally had to call my brother for any and all updated goss. My brother works at Dental and just also started at Dental. His wife is also a dentist so I waited till I could catch them both. Between the 2 dental clinics, there are 2 dental nurses that are good friends. One works for my brother and one for Andrew.We’re nearly at the end of the thread @soccer_ball_hero
Actual photo of me making the timelinesI’m not sure if it is a legal possibility in his jurisdiction but I thought it was plausible that Andrew could have slapped an injunction on her to remove the explicit photo of the baby under parental rights, perhaps on the grounds that it was exploitative of Pixie and he was not consulted before she posted it as the father. If that’s a possibility I could see where, perhaps, whatever legal justification he would have it might expand to her posting other photos regarding a funeral or what have you. Anything that might be considered exploitative. And perhaps she’s not talking about it much because she doesn’t want to step into that gray area.
I completely agree with you, I think she’s also not talking about it because she doesn’t wanna get caught out for lying. Especially if she has been reading here and has seen how we have reconstructed an entire criminal timeline going back to her date of conception She would be smart to think that she doesn’t want to add any more fuel to the fire in regards to the sleuthinb that we do here to connect the dots. The only thing we don’t have is the corkboard with the red strings
I think it's also important that DV claims stop being posted on here, as it literally was one person who claimed she "may have said it" to get her records kept private as a little side comment, but now lots on here are posting as though it is a real possibility.I don’t think ANYONE said she claimed DV. What was said was that if you mention DV to your healthcare team records are further protected or ‘sealed’ as someone mentioned she made sure her records are sealed therefore people have assumed she’s claimed he was violent against her. Medical records are private and confidential in the first place. I cannot stand Sophie but she hasn’t once said there was any DV.