ngl this was very.... oddI'm only writing this with the intent that Keelin sees it - I haven't been on here in months due to seeing a counsellor who helped me overcome past trauma and I feel no hate towards Keelin at all anymore. Intense hatred of any person is due to seeing their qualities in ourselves, and I saw in a tiktok today she posted a thing about checking under her bed for monsters. This is absolutely normal for someone suffering from unresolved trauma, and I just want to suggest to Keelin to see a Jungian/psychodynamic trained counsellor to help her become happy. When I became happy with myself I stopped hating her. A Jungian therapist will help embrace your creativity and help you improve your relationship with your partner and family - and most importantly finding happiness in living your life authentically as you are without shame. I just want to warn against exposing your own daughter to your narcissistic mother - your child will hate you for it Keelin I'm sorry but I think you know this yourself deep inside. Doing what's best for your mental health, is doing what is best for your daughter. To paraphrase Jung, "there is nothing worse for a child's development than the unlived life of a mother". Your mother is ruining your life, your feelings towards her are completely valid and poetry is helping you heal, and I wish nothing but the best for you and your child. The difficult option of cutting out a toxic parent is the only way to happiness, narcissist's don't feel empathy even our own mothers.
ngl this was very.... odd
kekedoyouloveme
Well-known member
Apparently Eimear was asked at the Valentine’s event about the falling out, and she said Keelin turned sour when she (Eimear) got signed by Andrea Roche. Keelin has representation with The Millar Agency in the UK but obviously Andrea Roche would be a bigger deal here. Seemingly, Keelin got spiteful over not being scouted by AR in tandem with Eimear, and so she pulled the plug on the pod in an attempt to render Eimear without a platform, and therefore without the need for representation with AR. Very vindictive really , isn’t it?
littleinvestigator
New member
lanadelrio
Member
So I listened to her recent podcast episode w Eimer and I have some thoughts.
Overall, I did find her and Eimer to be quite funny and entertaining but there were parts that rubbed me the wrongs way.
Keelin’s constant talk about stretch marks and how she didn’t get any, and how she was so scared, but you know, she just has
AMAZING genes so she’s immune. This is so weird to me, because didn’t we as a society move on from this fear like ages ago? I’m not Irish so I don’t know the cultural response to stretch marks but in my experience, stretch marks are so normal; it’s impossible for both an adult person (regardless of sex) to not at least be desensitised to them. Even my boyfriend has stretch marks, and I don’t think they detract from his beauty in any way, if anything they add to it. I think it’s a bit weird how she keeps bringing it up. Even if it was a fear of yours, it’s okay now because you don’t have them so why repeatedly mention this?
Eimer repeatedly referencing her weight loss and how happy she is now. I understand she just got out of a breakup, and it’s great that she’s managed to get in shape and be happy, but she kept referring to it over and over. It was a bit obsessive.
The way that Keelin and Eimer spoke about the baby’s physical appearance. It was just so weird, and so not feminist at all. I recall them saying things like “Her lips are so full, people will go to plastic surgeons for her lips”, “She’s going to be so hot when she grows up”, “I’m glad she wasn’t an ugly baby so I didn’t have to lie to you when she was born”, “She’s gonna be so popular”. It was actually so jarring hearing these two women place so much value in this baby’s appearance. Granted the baby is only weeks old so they haven’t developed much of a personality to compliment, however, their face isn’t even fully developed but you’re already imposing all of these aesthetic expectations. I was surprised by how genuinely superficial the conversation was, especially because they brand themselves as feminists, so they should know the damage this talk can do to daughters.
Also just the usual hypocrisies when it comes to environmentalism and her clothing choices.
Overall, I did find her and Eimer to be quite funny and entertaining but there were parts that rubbed me the wrongs way.
Keelin’s constant talk about stretch marks and how she didn’t get any, and how she was so scared, but you know, she just has
AMAZING genes so she’s immune. This is so weird to me, because didn’t we as a society move on from this fear like ages ago? I’m not Irish so I don’t know the cultural response to stretch marks but in my experience, stretch marks are so normal; it’s impossible for both an adult person (regardless of sex) to not at least be desensitised to them. Even my boyfriend has stretch marks, and I don’t think they detract from his beauty in any way, if anything they add to it. I think it’s a bit weird how she keeps bringing it up. Even if it was a fear of yours, it’s okay now because you don’t have them so why repeatedly mention this?Eimer repeatedly referencing her weight loss and how happy she is now. I understand she just got out of a breakup, and it’s great that she’s managed to get in shape and be happy, but she kept referring to it over and over. It was a bit obsessive.
The way that Keelin and Eimer spoke about the baby’s physical appearance. It was just so weird, and so not feminist at all. I recall them saying things like “Her lips are so full, people will go to plastic surgeons for her lips”, “She’s going to be so hot when she grows up”, “I’m glad she wasn’t an ugly baby so I didn’t have to lie to you when she was born”, “She’s gonna be so popular”. It was actually so jarring hearing these two women place so much value in this baby’s appearance. Granted the baby is only weeks old so they haven’t developed much of a personality to compliment, however, their face isn’t even fully developed but you’re already imposing all of these aesthetic expectations. I was surprised by how genuinely superficial the conversation was, especially because they brand themselves as feminists, so they should know the damage this talk can do to daughters.
Also just the usual hypocrisies when it comes to environmentalism and her clothing choices.
angeldolly
Member
Why is she SO PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE? somebody asked a simple question and a REASONABLE question given that she spent a large portion of her online presence speaking about veganisn so it’s entirely fair to ask about it?? being so rude is not the serve she thinks it is.
glitterguts
Active member
Jaysus.
Attachments
turbomunch
Chatty Member
Oh no, my hipster man child retail assistant boyfriend didn’t live up to the wholesome hands-on breadwinner dad image I projected onto him, what ever will I do
miserysorrow
Chatty Member
A French-speaking child psychologist
ButternShpuds
Well-known member
Off topic but if Jason cut his hair he would be the spit of a young Rowan Atkinson 
Attachments
Poppydaisy
Well-known member
"Heres an entire video about what I eat in a day" straight onto "why does it matter what I eat in a day" 
RALN
Well-known member
Alright Keelin, nice plug but jog onKeelins private youtube (monthly subscription) is so good, more down to earth, honest and wholesome tbh. Hate on it but ya'll missing out. Im glad she has it on members only so she can filter out people who comment on her every move and word. No one deserves to be spoken about in the way she gets spoken about above^
appleshampoo6
Member
i’m around the same age as keelin and have so many guys in my sort of peripheral circle who act so *~woke~* and ~feminist~* and expect such a pat on the back for it, whilst also acting exactly the same as all the guys who don’t - they still are so leery around girls at parties, don’t understand lgbt issues, expect their mums to do their laundry and cook for them, etc. just seems like being up to date with social issues has such social currency now but its backfired because guys now use all this vocabulary they’ve learnt off instagram infographics, like intersectionality and inclusivity etc., but don’t understand they need to put it into practice too. they can talk the talk but can’t walk the walk. like jason its all well and good that ur a feminist and wear “god is trans” tshirts but if u rely on ur baby mama to do all the child care and scrub ur fuckin shite off the toilet bowl whilst ur swaggering around town pretending to be a professional musician ur just as bad as the guys who don’t claim to be feminist at all sry x
kekedoyouloveme
Well-known member
Strapping her child to her chest, in a €557 Artipoppe carrier, so she can assemble a tripod in her Da’s bathroom & film herself pissing. Perfectly choreographed to capture a dramatic, maternal pose in which she shields her baby’s face. Does she not understand that to film herself pissing with her daughter in tow is already a massive intrusion?? She’s absolutely insufferable, I’m sorry. Who does this kind of shit?
Attachments
ButternShpuds
Well-known member
I dunno as much as I don’t particularly wish unhappiness on her, she got pregnant without planning properly when they both didn’t have stable jobs that would support a family.
Like what did she expect?
I’ve wanted a baby for years and I’m nearly 30.
I was with a fella for 9 years (broke it off) but we were both in a living and financial situation that wasn’t ideal, so now I’m so glad we never were engaged and never had a baby.
I’m not saying every baby born MUST be brought in planned to make it work, but it’s hard to give sympathy to someone who chose to let it happen that way. She’s not 16 ffs.
Like what did she expect?
I’ve wanted a baby for years and I’m nearly 30.
I was with a fella for 9 years (broke it off) but we were both in a living and financial situation that wasn’t ideal, so now I’m so glad we never were engaged and never had a baby.
I’m not saying every baby born MUST be brought in planned to make it work, but it’s hard to give sympathy to someone who chose to let it happen that way. She’s not 16 ffs.
queencarmen
VIP Member
why did she take that comment as an insult lol
bluebambino
Chatty Member
Sorry but this comment drives me nuts. Majority of Irish kids have only their dads surname and does anyone complain the mother didn’t get a look in. There’s a kid in my sons class and he has the mothers surname (parents married and together) and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard someone comment on how the mother must rule the roost there, the poor dad etc. it’s an extremely old fashioned view. Why should kids automatically be given their dads surname?
kekedoyouloveme
Well-known member
I think the Moncrieffs, maybe aside from Ellie, have been well established as class-appropriating nepo-babies. And though they’re oblivious and likely in denial, I’ve yet to see them speak as callously as Eimear with regard to the underclass. They romanticise poverty and ignore the social/political implications of doing so, absolutely, but Eimear drags it to a new low.
I actually found out that her maternal grandfather was Pádraig Ó Siochrú, a newsreader with RTÉ and an award-winning Irish-language writer; he actually wrote 20 radio plays for RTE. He was also an actor, a former high-jump champion, a theatre critic and a FOUNDING MEMBER of Leopardstown Golf Club. He’s quite the persona when you Google his name. All this to say that Eimear comes from a long line of multi-generational wealth and status.
Likewise with Séan Moncrieff, his parents had the financial capacity to be able to put him through private boarding school (Garbally College). Like Eimear, it indicates that Keelin is the third generation to profit from membership of the upper-middle class.
At the end of the day, both girls directly benefited from elitist schooling, too. Keelin went to Sutton Park School. In 2022, day students pay €12,000 per annum while boarding amounts to €20,100. From the school’s own website, “Situated on 140 acres, the school is renowned for its facilities which includes a nine-hole golf course.” Enough said.
Similarly, Eimear went to Coláiste Íosagáin in Booterstown - a gaelscoil. It’s been well documented that gaelscoileanna are elitist on both socio-economic and educational grounds. David McWilliams writes about the issue with incredible depth in “The Pope's Children”, for example, as do Sarah Carey and Kathryn Holmquist in Irish Times articles from December 2008.
To Keelin and Eimear, whether knowingly or not, you’re both engaging in class appropriation. You’re taking elements of the lower class and adopting them into your middle/upper-class culture, whilst totally ignoring the social and political implications, and even mocking elements of the social. While you may think you’re reclassifying class, what you’re actually doing is attempting to make your own privileges appear natural in trying to commodify working class culture. It’s immoral and transparent as fuck, frankly. Do better.
I actually found out that her maternal grandfather was Pádraig Ó Siochrú, a newsreader with RTÉ and an award-winning Irish-language writer; he actually wrote 20 radio plays for RTE. He was also an actor, a former high-jump champion, a theatre critic and a FOUNDING MEMBER of Leopardstown Golf Club. He’s quite the persona when you Google his name. All this to say that Eimear comes from a long line of multi-generational wealth and status.
Likewise with Séan Moncrieff, his parents had the financial capacity to be able to put him through private boarding school (Garbally College). Like Eimear, it indicates that Keelin is the third generation to profit from membership of the upper-middle class.
At the end of the day, both girls directly benefited from elitist schooling, too. Keelin went to Sutton Park School. In 2022, day students pay €12,000 per annum while boarding amounts to €20,100. From the school’s own website, “Situated on 140 acres, the school is renowned for its facilities which includes a nine-hole golf course.” Enough said.
Similarly, Eimear went to Coláiste Íosagáin in Booterstown - a gaelscoil. It’s been well documented that gaelscoileanna are elitist on both socio-economic and educational grounds. David McWilliams writes about the issue with incredible depth in “The Pope's Children”, for example, as do Sarah Carey and Kathryn Holmquist in Irish Times articles from December 2008.
To Keelin and Eimear, whether knowingly or not, you’re both engaging in class appropriation. You’re taking elements of the lower class and adopting them into your middle/upper-class culture, whilst totally ignoring the social and political implications, and even mocking elements of the social. While you may think you’re reclassifying class, what you’re actually doing is attempting to make your own privileges appear natural in trying to commodify working class culture. It’s immoral and transparent as fuck, frankly. Do better.
Ahh come on nowBut she also knows she's on camera
do you think anyone would have the energy to act differently for camera while literally pushing a baby out?! Probably one of the most physically challenging tasks in life- not a hope you could put on a whole different persona during that.
fated2pretend
New member
so her former wholesome "~~autumn roadtrip~~" vlog with the view on the road as the main screen (?dk the right word for it, pardon me) got changed to THIS, she's really like every other, profiting off off clickbait on a segment which takes up not even a minute of the whole vlog where she's actually roadtripping; dissapointing to see this is how she choose to act
