Long time lurker, first time commenter. I'm an SEN parent and reading things like the above is actually pretty painful. It's not awful having a disabled child, it's tough but not awful.
Also, I'm a stay at home mum with a husband who helps when he can but when my daughter starts school after Easter we'll be using transport where possible. It's an opportunity for her to socialise, feel a bit of independence and saves me a 50 minute round trip. Am I selfish because physically I could do it myself? We've also left my daughter at her hospice for the weekend whilst we go away as it's literally the only opportunity we have to have a break. Her needs are so complex that friends/family can't look after her. The thought that some people view this as me dumping my child is disheartening. I'm sure Kaytee has a lot of faults and isn't the perfect parent, but I don't think you can underestimate the pressure parents of SEN children face. Maybe she doesn't need 60 hours of carers support, maybe she needs more help to set her up to better manage alone, but I personally believe all SEN parents need all the help thry can get.
I dont think people underestimate the pressure we face, theres been plenty of people on here advocating how it is for sen families and helping others understand. We have been saying how unfair it is that she is getting support that's not needed when many others require more support for their children whos needs are more complex but dont get it.
I dont know your circumstances but from what you have said it sounds like your in a different situation. Js needs are not that complex that nobody else can look after him, his needs are relatively low. He is able to stay with his dad and family. There is no difference in taking J on holiday than taking a child without needs. His needs are not that high that if he went on holiday with her she wouldn't be able to have a rest herself, his needs are very similar to children his age. She insisted the hospital discharged him when he was little so she could take him on holiday as making memories abroad was really important to her despite them asking her to take him somewhere closer and forcing her to cancel 2 holidays as he was too ill. They said spain was too far but she took him on a 5 hour flight to tenerife. She advocated that having holidays abroad was as important to make memories as staying in hospital for treatment if his future was unknown. More like she didn't want to cancel a 3rd holiday with her man because as soon as she realised she could apply for end of life hospice care, making memories abroad with J was no longer important for some reason, all that shouting she did to take him abroad at first disappeared once she knew she could apply for end of life hospice care. That is why I and others have likened it to dumping your child at kennels to go abroad. I would never fill out end of life hospice care for my child when they dont need that. I'd be ashamed of myself. I would also allow my child to go to their dad or family if I needed a break and she has that option.
I am all for parents being given respite and using it appropriately, especially when it's their only chance to rest and taking their child would be impossible, highly difficult or unsafe for the child. There are thousands that dont get that. Just because a child has a physical health condition I dont think that means they should be given support that's not needed, if we are going to give parents of children who have physical medical needs the opportunity to use hospices to go on holiday abroad, parents of children who have mental health needs should also get that chance as the hours spent caring can far exceed the hours Kathleen spends caring for J and those with mental health needs rarely get respite, support or care hours. I don't agree with anyone using a hospice and claiming their child needs end of life care when they dont, in order to go abroad with a guy. I also think children should go a few times to settle in before being left for a long period whilst their mum goes abroad. Personal opinion but I dont agree that if your child is in a hospice you should go far away to another country due to emergencies that may happen but no disrespect to those who choose to do that.
Another personal opinion is that if you have a motability car for a child and you live less than 3 miles from the school, are not working and have no other children to do the school run for, I think that transport place should be given to a child who has been refused it but needs it or if they're older and need to develop independence in the community skills. I understand what you are saying about the difficulties getting a child out of the car who has difficulties walking but Kathleen can manage to do that easily with J any other time. Not once has she said she struggles to take him out due to poor mobility. She rarely uses his wheelchair and the Walker only comes out for reels and ads. He's 3 it would be different if he was older with limited mobility, his mobility is delayed not severe. We all want our children to be treated like other children so I dont believe we should expect special treatment if it's not necessary and J's transport is not necessary but there are thousands of sen children who do need transport but its denied, plus alot of them dont have motability cars. I think its ableist to treat our children different if it's not something that's necessary but again just a personal opinion. I try to treat my children the same as each other, if I can avoid doing something that's not necessary I do. I think its important they all get as normal a childhood as possible, I wouldn't fight or insist on things that arent needed.
I don't believe sen parents should exaggerate their child's needs in order to get things, I dont think CHC should be used for childcare to enable a social and working life because if that's fair then CHC should be made available to every single parent carer who is unable to work regardless of what their childs diagnosis and needs are. CHC is not there so you can go out getting pissed every night to the point carers are reporting you for coming back in the night with a man drunk and arguing or walking around naked pissed.
I dont think it's right to hinder your childs wellbeing and health just so you can score high enough to receive things that they dont need so you benefit and can go out. It's dangerous, abusive and negligent. I don't know any sen parent that withdraws their childs meds to save them time and then screams that doctors arent helping their child when they become worse due to the meds that managed those things were stopped.
Services are over stretched and underfunded, I can't defend a sen parent just because I'm also a sen parent, if they're abusing the system and causing harm its indefensible.