Congratulations @MsMuir for naming the thread, and @Lady Avonlea for nominating it.
Congratulations to our newest VIPs @Yebo & @Lochness Monster
I hope one of you three (including @mrsp67) will name the next thread.
Most Liked Posts from the previous thread
Jeeves
VIP Member
Sunday at 2:25 PM
Last edited: Sunday at 2:39 PM
HalcyonOrganic
VIP Member
Saturday at 2:39 PM
Why aren’t my posts in the top 5?
Hatefull people here, I’ll switch sides to the laughter crew.
Yebo
VIP Member
Saturday at 10:45 PM
NEW REVELATIONS: Stephanie Jarvis at it again.
Clearly what has been discussed on Tattle.life has hit home at the crime family and they are frantically doing damage control. Let's look at her shenanigans with the Patreon Acccount.
When I first looked I noticed that the blurb was all about the chateau and renovation.
Then it changed to the Association and inviting the public to join the association as a member.
Then it changed to join and become a benefactor.
Now the blurb reads:
Stephanie Jarvis
Creating videos and restoring a 16th century French chateau!
So now the Patrons are paying for her to create videos as well as restoring the chateau.
This is part 1 of the offer. Paying her to create videos and then almost as an after thought, restore a 16th century French chateau.
Part 2 of the offer is when you click on the membership level it says that you are becoming a benefactor of the Association. All well and good? Well not exactly. And here's why.
When the offer was to become a member of the Association then all the Patreon funds would go to the Association and then used for the renovation of the dump. But with the various changes, this has been muddied and becoming a Patron means that yes, you do contribute to the Association and the renovation but, you also contribute to Creating Videos. There is no indication of what percentage of the Patreon funds goes to the renovation and how much goes to the video making.
Video making is a very broad term. It can include the video making around the chateau and it can include video making of, say Travel Vlogs. It's very loose.
The net effect of the above is that Stephanie Jarvis can explain any shortfall in the Association funds from Patreon by referring to the updated blurb and saying that well some of the funds went to video making and she went to Japan to make a video. And then she would be safe and everything would be above board. Well not exactly and here's why... Law of Contract.
When Stephanie Jarvis invited members of the Public to contribute to the renovation of her chateau, under law of contract that was an offer. When a member of the public read that offer and decided to join, that's acceptance. They accepted the idea that their contribution was going to the renovation of the chateau. The contract was then made. Every time Stephanie Jarvis has altered the wording/conditions of her Patreon page she is obligated, under the law of contract, to inform the existing Patrons in writing. Failure to do so means that she is in breach of contract.
I'm sure that you all have received emails from various websites informing you of changes to their Terms and Conditions? This is exactly where that comes from, the law of contract. Stephanie Jarvis should have emailed every Patron when she altered her terms and conditions so that they could decide for themselves whether or not they would be content to continue as a Patron under the new rules. She did not do this. This a tried and tested point of law. The Patrons have to know when the conditions change.
The most egregious, and in my view, criminal, alteration was when Stephanie Jarvis removed the Patrons as members of the Association without informing them of the change in contractual terms, the ultimate affect being that she could
1) hide the accounts from them and
2) prevent them from having a say in the way that the renovations were performed. It also meant that she barred them from the AGM where they could have voted in responsible officers to run the Association and the renovations.
As you can see this is pretty complex and I've just tried with broad brush strokes to paint the scene. It does however, get more ominous.
I have in the last day or so read in here that Stephanie Jarvis has been buying Patreons at $1 each plus commission with aim to boost her ratings on Patreon and give a more favorable image of her account to entice more people from the wider public to join. If this is correct, and if she has been doing this then her actions fit the legal definition of fraud. Once again, this is a criminal act. This however is more a matter for the authorities and whilst it will be included as a possibility in my 4th (fourth) amendment to this case and it would not be proper to comment further on here.
I won't even start on the taxation implications... blows my mind...
It looks to me, you fellow hags and 15 menopausal... or is it 15 menopausal hags and 3 whatever..... Baconater/Beccky/Pork Belly... help me out here! I'll start again. It looks to me that there is a lot of panic in the farmhouse wreck. The mills of God grind slow but they grind exceedingly small.
Jules100
VIP Member
Sunday at 7:26 PM
I honestly don’t know why the dump crew would want to publicly out Clara. It would only add more credibility to her claims. It won’t stop TL, this forum is a beast that has taken in a life of its own. Also, if they don’t already know who Clara is, they are a bigger bunch of idiots than we think they are. What would they do anyway? Tell the local townspeople that “Clara” discussed the weird goings on at the chateau in an online gossip site. Who cares? I bet the locals already hate the Lalanders.
*My autocorrect keeps trying to change dump to frump, I guess that works too. iPhone knows best!
Pekey
VIP Member
Sunday at 12:56 PM
Adding this one
, as it is so important. Even though people become her Patreon members by their own volition, she has duped many by stating it was for restoration and renovation!
SimonNigel
New member
Sunday at 3:18 PM
There.
I hope our Kiwi tartlets are weathering the storm. Stay safe.
@Summerbaby I haven't forgotten your post, I've just been too busy to post a description.
I guess then there is all to say, check out the wiki and happy tattling.
Congratulations to our newest VIPs @Yebo & @Lochness Monster
I hope one of you three (including @mrsp67) will name the next thread.
Most Liked Posts from the previous thread
Jeeves
VIP Member
Sunday at 2:25 PM
HIs favourite card is Fanny's credit card.
Last edited: Sunday at 2:39 PM
HalcyonOrganic
VIP Member
Saturday at 2:39 PM
Why aren’t my posts in the top 5?
Hatefull people here, I’ll switch sides to the laughter crew.
Yebo
VIP Member
Saturday at 10:45 PM
NEW REVELATIONS: Stephanie Jarvis at it again.
Clearly what has been discussed on Tattle.life has hit home at the crime family and they are frantically doing damage control. Let's look at her shenanigans with the Patreon Acccount.
When I first looked I noticed that the blurb was all about the chateau and renovation.
Then it changed to the Association and inviting the public to join the association as a member.
Then it changed to join and become a benefactor.
Now the blurb reads:
Stephanie Jarvis
Creating videos and restoring a 16th century French chateau!
So now the Patrons are paying for her to create videos as well as restoring the chateau.
This is part 1 of the offer. Paying her to create videos and then almost as an after thought, restore a 16th century French chateau.
Part 2 of the offer is when you click on the membership level it says that you are becoming a benefactor of the Association. All well and good? Well not exactly. And here's why.
When the offer was to become a member of the Association then all the Patreon funds would go to the Association and then used for the renovation of the dump. But with the various changes, this has been muddied and becoming a Patron means that yes, you do contribute to the Association and the renovation but, you also contribute to Creating Videos. There is no indication of what percentage of the Patreon funds goes to the renovation and how much goes to the video making.
Video making is a very broad term. It can include the video making around the chateau and it can include video making of, say Travel Vlogs. It's very loose.
The net effect of the above is that Stephanie Jarvis can explain any shortfall in the Association funds from Patreon by referring to the updated blurb and saying that well some of the funds went to video making and she went to Japan to make a video. And then she would be safe and everything would be above board. Well not exactly and here's why... Law of Contract.
When Stephanie Jarvis invited members of the Public to contribute to the renovation of her chateau, under law of contract that was an offer. When a member of the public read that offer and decided to join, that's acceptance. They accepted the idea that their contribution was going to the renovation of the chateau. The contract was then made. Every time Stephanie Jarvis has altered the wording/conditions of her Patreon page she is obligated, under the law of contract, to inform the existing Patrons in writing. Failure to do so means that she is in breach of contract.
I'm sure that you all have received emails from various websites informing you of changes to their Terms and Conditions? This is exactly where that comes from, the law of contract. Stephanie Jarvis should have emailed every Patron when she altered her terms and conditions so that they could decide for themselves whether or not they would be content to continue as a Patron under the new rules. She did not do this. This a tried and tested point of law. The Patrons have to know when the conditions change.
The most egregious, and in my view, criminal, alteration was when Stephanie Jarvis removed the Patrons as members of the Association without informing them of the change in contractual terms, the ultimate affect being that she could
1) hide the accounts from them and
2) prevent them from having a say in the way that the renovations were performed. It also meant that she barred them from the AGM where they could have voted in responsible officers to run the Association and the renovations.
As you can see this is pretty complex and I've just tried with broad brush strokes to paint the scene. It does however, get more ominous.
I have in the last day or so read in here that Stephanie Jarvis has been buying Patreons at $1 each plus commission with aim to boost her ratings on Patreon and give a more favorable image of her account to entice more people from the wider public to join. If this is correct, and if she has been doing this then her actions fit the legal definition of fraud. Once again, this is a criminal act. This however is more a matter for the authorities and whilst it will be included as a possibility in my 4th (fourth) amendment to this case and it would not be proper to comment further on here.
I won't even start on the taxation implications... blows my mind...
It looks to me, you fellow hags and 15 menopausal... or is it 15 menopausal hags and 3 whatever..... Baconater/Beccky/Pork Belly... help me out here! I'll start again. It looks to me that there is a lot of panic in the farmhouse wreck. The mills of God grind slow but they grind exceedingly small.
Jules100
VIP Member
Sunday at 7:26 PM
I honestly don’t know why the dump crew would want to publicly out Clara. It would only add more credibility to her claims. It won’t stop TL, this forum is a beast that has taken in a life of its own. Also, if they don’t already know who Clara is, they are a bigger bunch of idiots than we think they are. What would they do anyway? Tell the local townspeople that “Clara” discussed the weird goings on at the chateau in an online gossip site. Who cares? I bet the locals already hate the Lalanders.
*My autocorrect keeps trying to change dump to frump, I guess that works too. iPhone knows best!
Pekey
VIP Member
Sunday at 12:56 PM
Its getting so confusing that I am beginning to feel that EVERYONE here is Potts except Me !!!Sasha Groves said:
Does anyone else look to see if KikiGee or Julesand
Adding this one
, as it is so important. Even though people become her Patreon members by their own volition, she has duped many by stating it was for restoration and renovation!SimonNigel
New member
Sunday at 3:18 PM
She has $2,400 of my money I'd like back to give to people who really need it! I'd sue her here in the US if I could get jurisdiction over her.
There.
I hope our Kiwi tartlets are weathering the storm. Stay safe.
@Summerbaby I haven't forgotten your post, I've just been too busy to post a description.
I guess then there is all to say, check out the wiki and happy tattling.
