Here is an August 22, 2022 post by Çlara that brought up some good points:
I'm still hoping to gather more evidence about Stephanie Jarvis buying subs and faking patreon numbers. It's been noticed before but her patreon videos are liked by 600 to 700 people at most, and she claims to have over 4000 patrons. The most heard argument for patrons about why they are paying her is that they claim they don't mind paying for extra content. So they don't mind paying for it, but liking it is a bridge too far? Do they even watch the patron videos? Paying for content you can't even pretend to like must be the dumbest thing I've ever heard
I posted this on July 23, 2022:
I have thought that for a long time. She can buy a Patron for even a $1 donation per month. The actual donations per Patron are available to the Patreon founder only. The statistics on the internet usually only divide the monthly amount of income by the number Patrons to come up with an average amount of money per Patron. So Fanny could have a thousand or more Patrons that pay $1 per month to be a member, which she actually pays herself. You can be a Patron for $1 a month even through Fannys membership tiers start at $5.
I believe Fanny has 70 or so Patrons at the $100 tier monthly but I think these Patrons can donate far in excess of the $100 monthly commitment.
I think she pads the numbers of Patrons to get into the top percentage of Patreon accounts.
Remember Fanny wants to come in at the top of anything she does and wants to win in everything regardless of what she has to do to win. I think she only has a small number of Patrons who donate big money and Fanny inflates the amount of Patrons to make sure the few high paying Patrons think she is successful and beloved by thousands of Patrons who believe her.
She wanted to be the top Patron of the Shittoo crowd, so she buys Patrons, views, deletes comments, adds comments, etc. Remember Larkin had to tell her where the big prizes were hidden at Easter, she had to find the baby hidden in the cake, etc. She embellishes every thing she does to appear to be the best, like implying that she was a professional opera singer, etc.
Maybe someone on here with Patreon experience can explain how the accounts can be artificially manipulated just as YouTube accounts can be tampered with.
Second post that day:
A $1 per month Patreon member would cost Fanny a Patreon processing fee of .5% of $1 + 10 cents, to total a processing fee of 15 cents per $1 Patron.
If she thru aliases, etc. were to set up 1,000 $1 Patreon accounts, it would cost her the $1,000 to pay Patreon , which would then pay her back $850 (Patreon would keep $150 as a processing fee on these accounts).
Speculation only here: Even if you assumed she loses the full $1,00 per month buying 1,000 members, paying 1,000 a month to secure $34,000 a month in tax free donations is only
.03% of the amount she receives tax free from Patreon monthly. And it increases her numbers to help her be in one in the top 400 Patreon accounts, and makes it look like she has a loyal, avid following of admirers. You know how Fanny wants to be with the winners in life.
Does this make sense? Between Patreon, the non profit association charity, youtube, the gift grab channel, the B and B, Chateau DIY, and the Larkin dilemma, Fanny is playing with a house of cards : if one falls, the others come tumbling down. And when the money runs out, so will the Douche Lord, the gardeners, the paid cook, etc. And she may have a huge amount of legal issues, taxation issues, and other problems for both her and Mummy to deal with as well as all the newly discovered long standing structural issues at the Shittoo. And she has alienated dozens of people by using and discarding them and with her greediness.
a few weeks at home is all she can bare....
nightmare fuel