The Archie Battersbee Case #10

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Do you really think Holly would be talked down by anyone about this, especially an ex partner? I just don’t understand how you can call out Holly for doing media appearances while at the same time calling put the dad for not doing enough and remaining in the background.
You can put out a statement to the media or give a statement to the court without making multiple tv appearances or it becoming a media circus. Is it difficult to understand the difference? He also could have made a different choice with the court proceedings, as a separate respondent/clamaint (I’ve seen family members listed on different sides in other cases) or joined up with the guardian. He didn’t have to be on Hollie’s side with any of this in court.

I can respect he’s not shared any photos or done many tv appearances, and he can’t stop Hollie from doing so, but I can absolutely criticise him for not speaking up for Archie and for going along with Hollie against the trust and the guardian. His voice still mattered in court, the one place he could have done the right thing for Archie. But I can only assume he wanted the chaotic and unpredictable death and risky move to a hospice that Hollie did. I stand by that he’s still massively let Archie down, just like his mother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
But if he disagreed he could have said so and had his opinion taking into account. But he didn't so probably agreed with it all and didn't get any flack for that, seen many many posts saying how sorry people felt for the dad
Or he know what she is like and didn't want the backlash from her while dealing with his own grief for his son. she strikes me as a very controlling person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
New thread is up
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Sky News are reported about a potential inquiry by the Government as to how these cases are handled in future.

Hopefully that will be Archie's legacy to stop other children suffering invasive and futile treatment such as he has.
There's been a few in recent years but I fully agree these cases need to be looked into.

Just reading some comments on these threads and people who have sadly lost their beloved ones and questioning their very painful decisions.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 5
It’s not even about the money, it’s about the fact he was literally brain dead and there were no viable treatment options left.
The rubbish about moving him to a hospice should be stopped straightaway by even a mediocre interviewer.
They could say but his parents didn't allow a scan in case moving him for it, was detrimental to him...

I feel for people who have had now deceased family members on ventilators, and will be listening to and reading about the 'bravery and the fight' stuff for weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.