You can put out a statement to the media or give a statement to the court without making multiple tv appearances or it becoming a media circus. Is it difficult to understand the difference? He also could have made a different choice with the court proceedings, as a separate respondent/clamaint (I’ve seen family members listed on different sides in other cases) or joined up with the guardian. He didn’t have to be on Hollie’s side with any of this in court.Do you really think Holly would be talked down by anyone about this, especially an ex partner? I just don’t understand how you can call out Holly for doing media appearances while at the same time calling put the dad for not doing enough and remaining in the background.
I can respect he’s not shared any photos or done many tv appearances, and he can’t stop Hollie from doing so, but I can absolutely criticise him for not speaking up for Archie and for going along with Hollie against the trust and the guardian. His voice still mattered in court, the one place he could have done the right thing for Archie. But I can only assume he wanted the chaotic and unpredictable death and risky move to a hospice that Hollie did. I stand by that he’s still massively let Archie down, just like his mother.