It sounds like all those ‘sources’ know as little as the rest of us. Being angry at BBC bosses without knowing what information they had. Funny how Scott isn’t telling his friends what it was, isn’t it? If it’s all over ‘nothing’?
I really dislike the below - it’s suggesting that his friend thinks the allegation is unlikely to be true because nobody else has come forward? That’s a really damaging mindset to have. That because there is only one victim, the allegation is less credible or severe? No floodgates, no problem?
While it’s obviously not known if the circumstances are in any way comparable, friends of Mills are quick to point out that when Edwards’ behaviour was exposed, there were others who came forward to tell of their own experiences at the hands of the star. ‘But with Scott, there has been nothing, nobody else has come forward,’ says the friend. There are no more claims of any bad or creepy behaviour.
‘With Huw, the floodgates really opened, but this hasn’t been the case with Scott.’