- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yes but nothing I would ever post here.
Well this could go on. But fair enough.
It’s a public forum discussing the most hideous of crimes.
You would be very hard pressed to find that someone did not know facts about it ( as apposed to gossip )
It’s a small world.
In the legal world I should add.
You would be very hard pressed to find that someone did not know facts about it ( as apposed to gossip )
It’s a small world.
In the legal world I should add.
If you can’t say anything why even bother bringing it up? 
Biiiiig pinch of salt, folks.
Biiiiig pinch of salt, folks.
I’ve no doubt there’s plenty of apparent facts we don’t know but why would you even SUGGEST that you know something that you can’t speak about? I’m also struggling that someone working in the ‘legal world’ is confused between opposed and apposed.
I am not struggling with anything ?
I’m not getting your point tbh
It’s quite annoying though when people claim they know “inside” info and then say “sorry can’t reveal anything”. Not just on here but on all threads.
I suppose liking pictures of random women is a step up from abandoning his child/punching his girlfriend/breaking a window/stealing from his child’s memorial fund for charity. He didn’t exactly set the bar too high for himself though.
Nothing “ annoying “ about anything.
it’s the law.
This is all sub justice.
maybe you should familiarise yourself with it.
As I said. After conviction it will all come tumbling out
it’s the law.
This is all sub justice.
maybe you should familiarise yourself with it.
As I said. After conviction it will all come tumbling out
That’s my point x
Well I’m sure I can speak for everyone when I say we look forward to that
I have contributed to 10 threads.
I give up.
I give up.
Presumably you mean ‘sub judice’?
As I said.
I give up.
I give up.
I thought the same.
Sometimes when you write sub judice it autocorrects.
I honestly mean this in the nicest possible way, when stating you know inside info then go on to say that you can’t reveal it, it’s going get people intrigued and asking questions.
Of course you can’t reveal anything that could harm and interfere with the case. But maybe wait until after the sentencing or when the media/whoever tumbles it all out before you post saying you know info?
In the rules section of this forum, there is a request to ‘either say something or don’t say it’. And not to suggest that you have information that you can’t disclose here.
I just read something that said the average social worker has a caseload of 37 when the recommended number is 18. No wonder cases like this and Star’s happen.
It boggles my mind that what is fought for is longer sentences and not more investment for prevention.
It boggles my mind that what is fought for is longer sentences and not more investment for prevention.
- Status