Hannahebee
VIP Member
I don't understand why Ruby is showing footage of her old planner as Monday the 30th August was in 2021.
Last edited:
omg literally why does she have to mention that she has read antigone in 2018. no well-read person ever says things like ulysses, which I first read in 2008... she is fooling no one; it only shows how insecure she is about her intellectual and cultural caliber. and she fucks her insipid allusions up every damn time. remember the notorious 1984 incident lolView attachment 2327534
Whoops, Ruby wasn't paying attention when Googling "quotes about siblings" and accidentally reveals she didn't actually read the thing she claims she read, for the 42,948,567th time.
I'm also dying at Ruby's weirdly clinical and ambiguous birthday message to her sister; note that Ruby doesn't actually says anything positive about her sister or their relationship anywhere in this post.
ChatGPT will give a passable summary of a novel for example, and can list things such as main themes, but if you ask it to produce actual text, it’s very generic and there will be errors mixed in with facts, and it’s hard to tell the difference unless you know the subject. I’ve used it a little for background work (for example, I asked it to summarise a novel I didn’t have time to read for a paper I was writing on theory, so I didn’t actually use anything AI produced in my writing, only the background process) but I wouldn’t rely on it to any significant extent. (I also asked it to write me a pattern for a knitted elephant, and it basically gave me instructions for knitting a tube with three holes for ”legs”, and a cuboidal trunk.)I'm absolutely clueless about ChatGPT. It's not something I can use in my job and I haven't got much time to spend learning it (so I haven't bothered) but I noticed a tutor on my MA course said that some students were flagged up on a recent module for AI and plagiarism. He said AI isn't good beyond superficial reading- not sure how true that is as I am a dinosaur. Hopefully Ruby knows not to use it for actual writing but I think she shouldn't mention it at all in her study videos, tutors don't like it.
They were definitely on the verge of shutting the company down in March because nobody was buying any of the crap on sale. Sixteenth closed Jack Edwards' store in March and the same time, Ruby posted a weird video talking about her flagging sales and blaming it on ordering too many yearly planners because the academic planner sold so well (it didn't).I'm amazed they are going for another round of the planners? Didn't they have to drop the price of the last lot, as they weren't shifting?Maybe this might be a last hurrah because she's off to Oxford and an academic planner is still relevant and 2 fans might want them. Next year though, who knows?
![]()
I’m sorry, but what on earth suggests that Ruby will ‘weaponise’ her mental health to get extensions? I’ve watched her content for years and have never seen her get an extension once, even when she was clearly exhausted and suffering mentally and physically due to her unsustainable working and eating habits. There were several moments during her time at Exeter when she should have taken a break and asked for an extension. Unfortuately I think she is way too proud and obsessed with being a perfect student to ever ask for an extension. I’d love to see her be able to ask for an extension. More people should ask for them!I’ve been thinking more about Ruby’s decision to apply for the early modern MSt, and how - to be frank - utterly ridiculous it is. She doesn’t like the period; it’s never been her literature of choice; we know this. She’s very obviously applied because it’s less competitive to get into compared to some of the other MSt courses. I realise these are not original points, but just recapping here before moving on.
The issue is that she is SO fixated on going to Oxford that she’s screwed herself over in terms of doing something she might actually like, academically. Feel free to skip my entire post if you’re not interested in deeply nerdy waffling about alternate options she could have (should have) taken.
Ruby will struggle to get good marks on the MSt, because she’s one of the weaker members of the cohort. She did a less rigorous degree and got a lot of help, whereas others in the cohort will have done more rigorous degrees without leaning on a friend the way Ruby did (and will also have genuine, independent interest in the period).
She will probably try to compensate for being at the weak end by (1) slogging and (2) sucking up to the dons, but neither will work quite as well at masters level. However, she’s canny enough to weaponise her mental health for extensions etc (I’m not concerned about mentioning this because I don’t believe it’s giving her ideas - she knows), and Oxford will grant those. She knows how to advantage herself.
If she underperforms in the masters, she will have a much more difficult time being accepted for a DPhil at Oxford (even though she is massively advantaged by not needing to win competitive funding, like most students). What she could have done - but didn’t because she just wanted to get to Oxford as quickly as possible - was do a masters in something that actually interested her (children’s literature), and where it was thus much more likely she would get higher marks. That would also have given her a more focused and refined application for DPhil at Oxford, along with, ironically, a stronger academic profile, and she could’ve gained a doctoral place for four years!
There absolutely are academics at Oxford who are interested in children’s literature and would have considered supervising her, if she’d presented a strong DPhil application with high masters marks in a relevant field. I’m not saying who they are because I refuse to help her, haha.
But her chances of successfully applying to write a doctoral thesis on something she would genuinely like (twentieth century literature for children/girls, mostly) are if anything hurt, not helped, by the MSt she is doing. It makes her look indecisive and academically unfocused. The appropriate MSt would have been the modern one, but I’m guessing she felt she wouldn’t get in, and was intimidated by the content. You don’t study modern and contemporary literature at a top university without engaging properly with literary theory and challenging texts. That’s why she should have done a focused masters somewhere else, aimed to nail that with high marks, and then gone for Oxford. But oh well. Too late now.
her feet look like they’re in need of an exorcismView attachment 2373329
She’s twirling on road now?
I'm guessing her parents were on one of their many holidays that week.I'm actually somewhat happy to see Ruby take a taxi to work. I'd like to think her parents sat her down and went "right you're an adult now with a job and it's your responsibility to get there and back"
Do I actually think that happened? No of course not. But it's nice to see Ruby not get driven by her parents as a 23 year old adult who is more than capable of learning how to drive (and tbh should know how to drive by now given that she lives in an area where you really need a car to get around).
In short it's nice to see her somewhat acting like an adult, even just for a split second. But we all know it won't last...shame
What did she even tried to achieve here... I can understand being bad at drawing or painting but this thing doesn't make any sense. Just take a piece of paper and make bookmarks instead, at least it won't ruin anything more than the paper!
Like, this is literal anti-vax, flat-earther, climate change denier, Holocaust conspiracy theorist levels of ignorance, stupidity and lack of scientific education.”Water transports oxygen to the brain”No, Roobee, your blood does that. You breathe air (not water!) and oxygen goes from your lungs into your blood, where it’s carried around your body to wherever it’s needed. On the other hand, it explains so much about her, if she legit thinks you can replace breathing with water.
I must not have drunk enough water, because that was my single takeaway from the video. She’s too stupid for words.