I completely appreciate what Mumsnetters are saying re Tattle. It’s not for everyone, we are here to gossip and that’s not everyone’s ‘cup of tea.’ HOWEVER, this current storm that Rachael finds herself in is not because of Tattle. This thread has been going for 18 months and since the initial questions died down, barely any members have crossed over and questioned her outright. Plus whenever someone did take it off here, they were pulled up.
This is a creation of her own doing. She was asked in June’19 to clear up those questions. She didn’t and flung herself into trying to be an InstaMum. That didn’t go well with the others and she then went back to her initial money spinner as a DA Advocate. She still is not qualified, her accounts are still ambiguous and now she is planning to give the equally unqualified Emily & Jordan access to vulnerable women, their children and their money. That’s not going to change no matter how much support you have. You simply need more to do this work than a mediocrely successful Instagram account. Had she followed the plan and kept Vanessa within the CIC then she would have had some credibility at least because of her background. However Vanessa saw the problems and got out taking her credibility with her. So people can come and go, shout ‘obsession,’ say it’s all ‘very mean,’ say they think she’s completely innocent or agree she isn’t. Their opinion is as valid as anyone else’s
But, the fact still remains that she is collecting funds via PayPal, she has collected nearly 30k in Go Fund Me campaigns (that unlike the PayPal had specific reasons for donations. If they we’re not used for the reasons stated, it is indeed fraud I’m afraid,) and the only answer she had was to cry in a car, tell lies on her Facebook page and not provide one substantial update on the donated funds that is/ was conclusive.
It’s within her power to do that. She can shut down this speculation very easily if it is incorrect. Though given what Ava shared and how concerned Vanessa is, she clearly can’t ‘prove her innocence.’ It’s not good enough to say ‘you have no right to ask,’ especially when her Husband is paid by the tax payer to uphold the law. So I’m sorry, Genie whoever you are. You are completely in the wrong both morally and legally. Though you are quite welcome to support her endeavour. Although I’d consider who you will be putting at risk whilst you do that
Frilly teeth? Flesh-coloured leggings? Home decor? Going down on your sister-in-law? Using your teenage daughter as your drugs supplier? Quality of parenting? Lack of morals? We just crack on babes.
