DipsyDoodle
VIP Member
And just in case we weren't already loving the fact her holiday is cancelled, she's about to get a bollocking off the ASA as well
Attachments
-
56.4 KB
Really??? I’m just really struggling to see itOh my god I thought that was Jimmy Saville
She got stopped by an educational psychiatrist.And there were others including a video of a jug she'd urinated in at A&E but I didn't think anyone would want to see that
That’s the thing- there’s no reflection on it from an adult perspective. It’s never “when I was a kid I didn’t understand why parents split up or what was going on but now I know X,Y & Z so I have context” Obviously to a young child one parent moving away out of the blue is going to be jarring but realistically, you don’t divorce and move house overnight.Yep. Her mum and dad's marriage was clearly over long before her mum left. As if a 4 year old sat upstairs on a phone and spoke to her mum. 4 year old children are not renowned for their telephone conversation skills. If she showed any signed of intelligence, I might believe it, but she doesn't. The whole woe is me tale just doesn't ring true.
Would have been an ideal opportunity for her to have proved to her followers that Josh not working was the right decision.. something along the lines ofSo all the spiel about how they realised they didn’t spend enough time on the kids and how Josh taking a career break would help them focus on the kids more, was a load of absolute bullshit
Lula’s ‘not herself at the minute’ but they both fuck off anyway
I'm not a GDPR expert but have had some experience dealing with data privacy with my job. My understanding is that when a data breach has happened, the company have to report it to the ICO within 72 hours of being notified or they could face higher penalties (I believe max amount is about £18m or 4% of annual global turnover, whichever is bigger). So Pebble Child as the Data Controllers should have also been in contact with the ICO to report themselves for GDPR non compliance after your complaint and the could then be fined accordingly. The month timeframe to respond to the Data Subject (i.e. VCJR) is because the company who has breached the info are allowed up to a month for time to investigate and respond to the breach. After this time, if they haven't responded (usually with a full report of how the breach occurred, how they are going to stop this happening in the future and an offer of compensation) then the ICO can take further action. Hope that helps!It's never happened to me before, so
I don't really know. But I after a few online chats, because i can't phone them directly, I was told to contact them a month after the initial date that my privacy was breached.
So, just another week and a half to wait.
What in the Dorothy Perkins is he wearing???She doesn't specify what she's crying about though. @FridaK if I gambled, I'd be putting money on your theory.
Eta, it's started! His new career!