Preston Davey Trial #4

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Caught in a lie. In police interview he said he knew Preston had apparently hung himself from the bars in his sleep as JV claims. Yesterday he said he was there so fleetingly and wanted to give the impression he didn’t really know what was going on (but also very angry about his roast 🥀) If he hadn’t seen Preston’s eyes (and therefore his blue lips and protruding blue tongue) then how did he know to tell police in interview that Preston was asleep?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
Horrible image being painted here. It’s obviously clear it’s not dribble coming from his mouth and exactly what killed him had happened on the 23rd too. With JMF there and only one reason there’s mixed dna with sperm and Preston’s dna right there.
 
  • Sad
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 30
He's making absolutely no sense. What on earth is he on about? Bank statements etc are completely irrelevant. Pete has got him bang on that he's just trying to buy time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
None of the photos of Preston show him with a squint, it can't have been that bad.
I can't help wondering if regular anoxic events from SA caused brain damage and a resultant squint.
I can see he has a vision issue in all photos of him. Even the early ones that I presume were taken by his foster parents. I don’t think he had a squint in the sense of a lazy eye, but more a tracking issue. I’ve seen it in babies I know in real life so know how it presents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Im so sure they were cleaning Preston’s record breaking dribble off the mural behind the cot 🙄🤥 probably whilst dropping their semen all over the place and retrieving the sex toys out the dogs mouth and lobbing nappies out the window in their show home 👍
 
  • Sick
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 33
I’ve heard enough, just send the pair of them away indefinitely. It’s becoming farcical.

As others have said, I am so glad Preston had those foster parents. They gave him a life filled with love even if it wasn’t for long. I hope they are doing okay.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 42
Are they able to call the medical professional who they showed the picture of Preston’s bottom to, or evidence that a consultation took place? No? Strange that…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
The only angle I think hes going at with the bank statements is timing. If he's shown to be buying something at the time of the photos, he cant have witnessed it and therefore cant have been involved in the abuse
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
I’ve heard the phrase ‘to show how he (Preston) acts’- what was the aim in these times? About the toy box, and I think it was about having jabs? Are they videoing him and his behaviour to get some kind of diagnosis of something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Mr Wright KC now asks the defendant about seizures.

Mr McGowan-Fazakerley says Preston never had a seizure in his presence but there was an incident where he was sick in his cot and staring, twizzling his hands, which he saw.

The prosecution refers to a previous incident when Preston was taken to hospital and Mr McGowan-Fazakerley left work to go to A&E. He says he was told Preston had a seizure in the emergency department.

On June 15, he was told Preston had another seizure, while on a business trip to London. Mr McGowan-Fazakerley says he felt helpless as he was getting on a plane and knew he had to turn his phone off. He says he got home very late and in the early hours.

‘He never said he recorded it, he never showed me the video. I remember him telling me he was sick and brought up some chocolate buttons.’

‘You were aware of the advice that had been given to you about recording seizures but then you failed to say to Jay, did you record it?' Mr Wright asks.

‘No, I didn’t ask if he recorded it, I didn’t,' the defendant responds.

Mr Wright asks: The next day did you say, ‘just like the hospital advised, did you record it?’

‘I didn't,' he replies.



I’m not a parent but surely if a child you proport
to care about was having seizures and your partner had filmed them ‘for the hospital’ you would want to see them no matter how upsetting!!! Just so you knew what to look out for
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
I’ve heard the phrase ‘to show how he (Preston) acts’- what was the aim in these times? About the toy box, and I think it was about having jabs? Are they videoing him and his behaviour to get some kind of diagnosis of something?
I think they were yes. I also think initially, they didn’t put 2 and 2 together to realise the SA was causing medical issues - plus it also offers a cover of ‘worried parents’ however, it also has a more sinister undertone in that I think they both enjoyed the aftermath more than the actual event (just my opinion). SA is often more so about power and control than the actual sexual gratification of the acts themselves, the sexual gratification comes from the power and control. They had full control over that little boy, I think they enjoyed seeing how the deprivation of oxygen effected him - they are true monsters
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 22
I can’t wait for this to be wrapped up now. We’re just going around in circles with two of the worst perverts this tit hole country has to offer. Get them gone!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40
Horrible image being painted here. It’s obviously clear it’s not dribble coming from his mouth and exactly what killed him had happened on the 23rd too. With JMF there and only one reason there’s mixed dna with sperm and Preston’s dna right there.
I bet it’s very obvious in the picture, not like the two things really look the same either is it 🤢

They are so disgusting. bleeping wretches
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Sad
Reactions: 24
Reading back though some of the earlier reporting they've suggested a few times that JV was attacking Preston because he was angry at JMF. He absolutely knew the risk of leaving him with JV.
Your partner is ranting and angry and then the baby is having a seizure not long after?
He hasn't put 2 & 2 together with anything has he, just can't seem to join the dots :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 18
I think they were yes. I also think initially, they didn’t put 2 and 2 together to realise the SA was causing medical issues - plus it also offers a cover of ‘worried parents’ however, it also has a more sinister undertone in that I think they both enjoyed the aftermath more than the actual event (just my opinion). SA is often more so about power and control than the actual sexual gratification of the acts themselves, the sexual gratification comes from the power and control. They had full control over that little boy, I think they enjoyed seeing how the deprivation of oxygen effected him - they are true monsters
Yes I wondered about whether they realised they were causing physical/ medical harm to his body.
Chills me to think about how that first night went when they first got him alone 😔
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Sick
Reactions: 14
I’ve heard enough, just send the pair of them away indefinitely. It’s becoming farcical.

As others have said, I am so glad Preston had those foster parents. They gave him a life filled with love even if it wasn’t for long. I hope they are doing okay.
I agree it's becoming farcical. I feel sorry for the jury because I would have made up my mind a long time ago and listening to this nonsense would infuriate me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 27