Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

felttipdieter

Active member
I think she just likes to stir things up to get attention. The Christmas pic with Nate could have been a way to just kick him in the nuts. Maybe the other guy started as a sugar daddy? She could have lived in KC longer just with someone else or just at a place that doesn't report to credit bureaus?
There are pictures of them on insta that go pretty far back 🕵🏻

I think she just likes to stir things up to get attention. The Christmas pic with Nate could have been a way to just kick him in the nuts. Maybe the other guy started as a sugar daddy? She could have lived in KC longer just with someone else or just at a place that doesn't report to credit bureaus?
There are pictures of them that go pretty far back on Instagram and someone (sorry I forget who!) said you can see him in last years Christmas, Halloween and summer vlogs from last year. It’s confirmed he’s in these old videos.
 
Last edited:

felttipdieter

Active member
If V. is primary, then she'd be saddled w/ the CC bill.

If he was just an additional cardholder / authorized user, the primary cardholder is still responsible for the bill.

That would mean V. would, again, be responsible for it.

Edited to add: I doubt a CC type like this would be a joint credit issue, but if it were, they'd both be named in the court docs. And if that were the case, it'd be even more stupid since I saw an Dec 2019 IG pic of her with a Porsche SUV captioned "hard work pays off."
If she could buy that, she could pay $900.
Agree 100%. I highly doubt that something like this would be a joint issue. Veronica would have to pay and be just as responsible if she was on the CC as well. She has a porsche? Nursing pays well.