I just took a look at her page for the first time in a while. She doesn't know whether she's coming or going, huh? "Anyone else in their happy solo girl travel era?" sandwiched in between "looking for other childfree girlies to go travelling with so I don't have to set up a tripod to take travel photos alone" and "finding friends to travel with as you get older can be really difficult." Alongside the standard wah-wah, another brand has pulled the pin on working with me because they didn't like the childfree angle ... referencing "as a mum I," "as a teacher I", "as an artist I" so why can't it be "as a childfree person I...?"
Because childfree on its own is not a thing. Brands are looking for marketing power. The teacher and artist can also be childfree - it's being a teacher or artist that is their point of difference. She's SO far into this childfree 'niche' and still has no point of difference beyond the absence of children. I follow a load of childfree women; my interest in their content isn't that they don't have kids - it's what they do with their childfree life. Sport, art, travel (that they don't spend the whole trip bitching about), craft, career, hobbies ... etc. They've all got a lot more on the go than a cat and a bad wardrobe.
Also, honey, most women in their thirties do have friends to go travelling with. Having to beg for this online is unique to you, not the norm. Trips may happen less but that's not just because everyone's having kids. That can be a factor, but I'd say it's more about aligning timing around work requirements, sports, other events, and um, possibly the cost of living crisis? Not to mention peoples' priorities organically shift in their thirties. Lots would rather save to buy a home than fork out thousands to take your travel photos for you. Soz.