Great summary and good to know she is paying so much attention hereThis evening's vlog is 100% a Tattle press conference:
shots of her wiping and hoovering the 2nd hand furniture, after comments here about the general mankiness;
her using a power tool to flex her DIY skills, to show she can do more than slop on paint;
letting us know the ill-proportioned dirty cream fabric sofas are temporary until others are delivered;
landowner Nicki allowing Carlo to believe he can drive around "his land"(after our comments that he is resident there at her whim as she was the sole signatory to the property and they aren't married);
the bedroom with the view is no longer called "Skye's bedroom" but is a room that might be used by "other guests" (however I bet Tommaso will be in that box room with the air hole in the ceiling);
needing another car in case Carlo has to go back to Positano (this is a Patreon beg).
Not to bang on about it (I really am thinking I sound tin-foil like I know!) but the no mention or care of a bedroom for Carlo's son just tells me that neither Carlo or his son plan on spending any time there. That, plus the idea of the second car... yes, a second car is useful, it's an interesting time for the issue to be raised I think.Just watched the latest vlog. Why are the kitchen and pantry already so cluttered? I know it’s all temporary but there was so much, it’s already a mess.
No talk of a bedroom for Carlo‘s son, but there is an extra room upstairs that Nicki doesn’t know what to do with. I’m guessing he will have to stay in the guest bedroom downstairs though, if he’s allowed to visit.
Regardless of the property itself, the old owners behaviour was so odd as to be a huge red flag for me. Asking for extra time then leaving late OK the day months later and taking lightbulbs etc .. something really odd about it allI hope the house in Tuscany doesn’t turn out to be an impulse buy of future nightmares. Huge red flags started waving as soon as I saw what’s more or less a wooden shed that the previous owners tacked on to the main body of the house. Now, having watched the latest video and “tour”, the red flags are waving in a gale of uncertainty. Did the owners get permission for creating the additional space attached to the house? Is the presence of the “extension” all correctly documented in the deeds? Is every t crossed and i dotted about work carried out (the extension) by the previous owners? Was no stone left unturned to be as certain as possible that there was no reason for the commune (civil district) to suddenly flex its muscles, even it’s going back years and way before a new owner buys the property.
That aside, I think that Nicki and Carlo were beguiled by the land, the position and the view, while the house was almost incidental. Plus, Nicki was desperate buy and reinvest the money from the sale of the property in England. Nicki said that they’d only spent about 10 minutes looking inside the house before they took possession. To me, that’s madness. However, they first viewed the property last summer. T spring and summer is a seller’s optimum time to have a house on the market. It’s easy for potential purchasers to be seduced by the outside as everything looks glorious. You can become blind to everything else.
The house has the strangest layout and, even using my most creative imagination, I can’t see how it could ever be a comfortable, friendly home.
Red flags and a chorus of “caveat emptor”. I wouldn’t have touched the place with a barge pole. That said, there’s a million miles of YT content ahead which, I suppose, is a plus.
(Why, why, why is the fireplace just inside the double doors and on the working side of the kitchen? Why, why, why are the double doors not centred? Both things make me twitch!)
I haven't watched it yet (and tbh probably wont) but I wonder if her buying this came about because the relationship is on the rocks, not having rooms for carlo or is son would indicate that)Not to bang on about it (I really am thinking I sound tin-foil like I know!) but the no mention or care of a bedroom for Carlo's son just tells me that neither Carlo or his son plan on spending any time there. That, plus the idea of the second car... yes, a second car is useful, it's an interesting time for the issue to be raised I think.
I physically laughed when she said her bedroom was feeling 'homely' - there isn't a single piece of furniture in that house with any sense of cohesiveness at all. I know tastes are subjective but god is it just so weird. A boho rug, a battered medieval-style trunk, a £5 white metal Ikea coat rack, and every wooden item in a different varnish, finish and grain... oh, and add on some industrial metal lamps. And a wicker basket. The dog's tennis ball is the homliest thing in there. 'Homely' is photos, heirlooms, furnishings that mean something - not crap you've picked up from the flea market.
It's so obvious she's trying to go for the effortlessly chic, I-didn't-try-at-all-but-it-looks-fantastic concept. Nicki will just never achieve that. Everything she does just has this overtone of desperation.
I could not believe I heard her twice say they were coming back for some furniture and then all that JUNK IN that shed type room. Is she crazy.? THOSE PEOPLE ARE NEVER COMING BACK EVER> the place is not appealing at all.Yeah, when Nicki sighed, rolled her eyes and said „no comment“ over the precious owners taking down those walls (after they had seen the house!) I just thought „go and find out why!!“ That seems important, and nothing to just brush over. But they don’t seem to be in contact with those people anymore. Nicki can forget about them picking up the trash they left behind.
Right?? If she wasn’t able to properly communicate with them before moving in (about what’s to be left behind, the walls, etc), what makes her think she’s ever going to get hold of them over picking up that junk? Delusional.I could not believe I heard her twice say they were coming back for some furniture and then all that JUNK IN that shed type room. Is she crazy.? THOSE PEOPLE ARE NEVER COMING BACK EVER>
I believe the house was a repossession, as the process got drawn out and it was explained that third parties were involved to bring about the eventual sale. That would explain the weird behaviour of the previous owners.Regardless of the property itself, the old owners behaviour was so odd as to be a huge red flag for me. Asking for extra time then leaving late OK the day months later and taking lightbulbs etc .. something really odd about it all
---
I haven't watched it yet (and tbh probably wont) but I wonder if her buying this came about because the relationship is on the rocks, not having rooms for carlo or is son would indicate that)
I think she holds a lot of resentment about it too. But I think she's got that horrible ingrained need to be unique or better than everyone else. And initially her idea was instead to go off and be the exotic, unique, wife of an Italian living the high life in the Mediterranean. I think she likes being the centre of attention - and initially Positano gave that to her, as a 'unique' Brit who can speak Italian and ISN'T a tourist!!! But then of course it becomes rather normal, and she needs to move on to something/someplace new.She is such a fish out of water, I think she holds a lot of anger that she's not a middle class Surrey housewife. Walton-upon-Thames with a nice cup of tea.
I believe she inherited the London property many years ago, in which case it would have realised a substantial increase in value which would be easily leveraged to fund the purchase of HER Tuscan property via equity release.I believe the house was a repossession, as the process got drawn out and it was explained that third parties were involved to bring about the eventual sale. That would explain the weird behaviour of the previous owners.
The London property might not have been sold, it might have been remortgaged and YouTube income covers repayments.
.......and don't forget the tortoise/s? I hope they know how to look after it when it comes out of hibernation. Someone will need to check on it regularly, feed and water it, if Nikki is going to be away for long periods of time, either back in Positano, or visiting friends or the UK regularly.Right?? If she wasn’t able to properly communicate with them before moving in (about what’s to be left behind, the walls, etc), what makes her think she’s ever going to get hold of them over picking up that junk? Delusional.
Yes! My initial thought was the neighbour proactively turning up to tell Carlo what land belongs to him - that's a bit pushy and indicative of him wanting to take more than is actually his. Surely they'd have received the deeds which state exactly what they own... the neighbour is chancing their luck I think.The information that they currently have seems to be coming word of mouth from the neighbours who, let's be honest, could tell them anything they wanted - including claiming extra bits of Carlo's land as their own??
I assumed she is autistic and that is why she has that tone and way of speakingthe voiceover is really annoying in the latest video, it is just so unnatural and trying to be "literary", and the rhythm of her speech is really odd, you can tell she is reading a script but it sounds like someone who is a non native speaker and doesn't exactly get the intonation etc right
Also, I "I never really take any time off..."
That thought had crossed my mind.I assumed she is autistic and that is why she has that tone and way of speaking
That's an interesting thought. I always presumed it was so dead-sounding because it was just straight off a written script. Might explain her social difficulties.I assumed she is autistic and that is why she has that tone and way of speaking
I thought the lisp was due to dental work because there's a marked difference in appearance if you look at the very early vlogs.Huh, I always thought she had a pretty strong lisp that she is trying to suppress while on camera, her being autistic hadn’t crossed my mind tbh