While I like some constructive criticism and dialogue I cannot be party to this thread. A loss is a loss. Who are we to judge? Clearly I was mistaken about this site. You should be ashamed
I have really valid and deeply concerning reasons as to how I feel about Nadia sawalha. I have observed her behaviour for a significant amount of time because she invited us into her life, makes money by inviting us into her life and exposes/over shares all aspects of her life to make money.
I do not make throw away statements and I am not ashamed to discuss her behaviour surrounding the well documented suicide of her ex husband. His family have made their thoughts on the matter clear. No one truly knows why anyone ends their life.
My point remains, I find it a deeply disturbing aspect of her behaviour that she uses a monetized youtube channel to profiteer on the very day a person she loved ended their life. That action she chooses to do every year is the reason for my comment. As disturbing as you've found my comment, I find her actions re christmas day equally disturbing.
Not everything has to be broadcasted. The making money from their adverts on that day is a whole different kind of wrong in my humble opinion.
I maintain that nadia shows zero respect for such a tragedy by broadcasting and profiteering on the very day he died. I feel it is in no way disrespectful to suggest having a wonderful but PRIVATE Christmas DAY, purely out of respect for someone she once LOVED, who ended their life on that day.
It is clear she has erased him from her memory which she's entitled to do, however she also makes money on a chat show debating all aspects of life.
She certainly didn't have a problem discussing and making money from the suicide of Caroline Flack.
In my opinion she chooses when to talk about the tragedy in relation to how it will benefit her directly.
I have a very open dialogue about a close friend who took their own life, I don't choose to speak about the tragedy in relation to how it might benefit me personally. I feel well qualified to comment on her behaviour around such a tragic subject because as I keep saying, she's invited us into her life, warts and all. No one forced her.
This forum isn't like the Sawalha-Adderleys where all honest and opposing opinions are deleted.
I needed to clarify why I said what I said as you said I should be ashamed. I completely respect your right to see things differently. The thread has already moved onto discussing another aspect of their monetized youtube channel as it moves at quite a pace as there is always alot to discuss regarding them.
It would be a shame if you left this forum, we value open and honest debate.
Nitty today after all her BS on elderly people says she is reducing her footprint by not going to Westfield after work
thank you Nitty!!!! Then follows ... work asks us not to socialise after work and it is not easy for the young... so ... Nitty goes for lunch with Jane & Kaye then goes for drinks with Lee. What is more normal?? 
