You should give it a go! A lot of what others have said is very valid. Certainly raises a lot of questions.that’s a shame, may have to give it a pass then.
I agree it is very weak re Murdoch.You should give it a go! A lot of what others have said is very valid. Certainly raises a lot of questions.
Having watched the whole thing now I would agree that the case against Murdoch is weak. Whether or not Joanne has any involvement is another question.
The two people who claim to have seen him in the weeks following his disappearance seem totally convinced. Then there is the part in the doc about Falconio and a life insurance policy, but to me that subplot felt a bit contrived.Does anyone think he is still alive???
I got the impression its very biased against Lees however i do feel she isnt a reliable witness at all. There is a lot about it that doesnt add up, if shes guilty then why would she do it in the middle of nowhere relying on strangers to pick her up? The outback is deadly. Then again why were there no signs of anyone but her? The area is so glat i find it difficult to understand how she couldve hid from someone.
A part of me is wondering whether they got into something dodgy and someone hit Peter and took him away and left her out there as punishment or something and warned her not to tell.
I really don’t know, I’m just thinking of scenarios. If your bf was murdered why would you be emailing your lover a few days later? I don’t think we will ever know what happened unfortunately.This is so interesting! I've always wondered "Why though?! What did she stand to gain??". Very interesting theory pal!
I think because they didn’t want NT to be seen as a dangerous place with a murderer on the loose.I do not believe for one second Peter faked his own death. If it was the case, why make it appear murder and send an innocent man to jail?
I do not believe at this point Joanne had involvement but I've had doubts. Her whole demeanor was just so odd during the police interviews, as was the correspondence with 'Steph' shortly after Peter's disappearance arranging to meet later that year.
Apologies, I was meaning why would Peter fake his own death and stage it to look like a murder, as opposed to an accident. It just doesn't add up for me.I think because they didn’t want NT to be seen as a dangerous place with a murderer on the loose.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?